Consistency in decision-making between survey teams and the decision-making body in a professional education program accrediting agency

Credibility of an education program accreditor is dependent on consistency in decision-making among program reviews. The use of peer-review accreditation survey teams is a potential source of inconsistency in the review of individual programs, especially so when the agency employs non-prescriptive a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robert Hash
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2019-05-01
Series:MedEdPublish
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/2433
_version_ 1811275610020904960
author Robert Hash
author_facet Robert Hash
author_sort Robert Hash
collection DOAJ
description Credibility of an education program accreditor is dependent on consistency in decision-making among program reviews. The use of peer-review accreditation survey teams is a potential source of inconsistency in the review of individual programs, especially so when the agency employs non-prescriptive accreditation standards. The accrediting agency that is the subject of this study utilized multiple steps to ensure consistency in the recommendations from peer survey teams. Analysis of the agreement between survey team recommendations and final decisions by the decision-making body revealed a coefficient of agreement of 0.927, indicated a high degree of agreement. The results suggest the accrediting agency's processes are effective in ensuring that peer review survey teams are applying the accreditation standards consistently between peer teams and the accrediting agency.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T23:40:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d23b9b40b8244908860120032e6866f1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2312-7996
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T23:40:47Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
record_format Article
series MedEdPublish
spelling doaj.art-d23b9b40b8244908860120032e6866f12022-12-22T03:11:59ZengF1000 Research LtdMedEdPublish2312-79962019-05-0182Consistency in decision-making between survey teams and the decision-making body in a professional education program accrediting agencyRobert Hash0American Medical AssociationCredibility of an education program accreditor is dependent on consistency in decision-making among program reviews. The use of peer-review accreditation survey teams is a potential source of inconsistency in the review of individual programs, especially so when the agency employs non-prescriptive accreditation standards. The accrediting agency that is the subject of this study utilized multiple steps to ensure consistency in the recommendations from peer survey teams. Analysis of the agreement between survey team recommendations and final decisions by the decision-making body revealed a coefficient of agreement of 0.927, indicated a high degree of agreement. The results suggest the accrediting agency's processes are effective in ensuring that peer review survey teams are applying the accreditation standards consistently between peer teams and the accrediting agency.https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/2433accreditationpeer reviewconsistencyeducational program
spellingShingle Robert Hash
Consistency in decision-making between survey teams and the decision-making body in a professional education program accrediting agency
MedEdPublish
accreditation
peer review
consistency
educational program
title Consistency in decision-making between survey teams and the decision-making body in a professional education program accrediting agency
title_full Consistency in decision-making between survey teams and the decision-making body in a professional education program accrediting agency
title_fullStr Consistency in decision-making between survey teams and the decision-making body in a professional education program accrediting agency
title_full_unstemmed Consistency in decision-making between survey teams and the decision-making body in a professional education program accrediting agency
title_short Consistency in decision-making between survey teams and the decision-making body in a professional education program accrediting agency
title_sort consistency in decision making between survey teams and the decision making body in a professional education program accrediting agency
topic accreditation
peer review
consistency
educational program
url https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/2433
work_keys_str_mv AT roberthash consistencyindecisionmakingbetweensurveyteamsandthedecisionmakingbodyinaprofessionaleducationprogramaccreditingagency