Recent grassland losses are concentrated around U.S. ethanol refineries

Although the United States has pursued rapid development of corn ethanol as a matter of national biofuel policy, relatively little is known about this policy’s widespread impacts on agricultural land conversion surrounding ethanol refineries. This knowledge gap impedes policy makers’ ability to iden...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher K Wright, Ben Larson, Tyler J Lark, Holly K Gibbs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2017-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6446
_version_ 1797748306443501568
author Christopher K Wright
Ben Larson
Tyler J Lark
Holly K Gibbs
author_facet Christopher K Wright
Ben Larson
Tyler J Lark
Holly K Gibbs
author_sort Christopher K Wright
collection DOAJ
description Although the United States has pursued rapid development of corn ethanol as a matter of national biofuel policy, relatively little is known about this policy’s widespread impacts on agricultural land conversion surrounding ethanol refineries. This knowledge gap impedes policy makers’ ability to identify and mitigate potentially negative environmental impacts of ethanol production. We assessed changes to the landscape during initial implementation of the Renewable Fuel Standard v2 (RFS2) from 2008 to 2012 and found nearly 4.2 million acres of arable non-cropland converted to crops within 100 miles of refinery locations, including 3.6 million acres of converted grassland. Aggregated across all ethanol refineries, the rate of grassland conversion to cropland increased linearly with proximity to a refinery location. Despite this widespread conversion of the landscape, recent cropland expansion could have made only modest contributions to mandated increases in conventional biofuel capacity required by RFS2. Collectively, these findings demonstrate a shortcoming in the existing ‘aggregate compliance’ method for enforcing land protections in the RFS2 and suggest an alternative monitoring mechanism would be needed to appropriately capture the scale of observed land use changes.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T16:03:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d2446e6af38949caa69815de477bbbeb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T16:03:00Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-d2446e6af38949caa69815de477bbbeb2023-08-09T14:32:06ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262017-01-0112404400110.1088/1748-9326/aa6446Recent grassland losses are concentrated around U.S. ethanol refineriesChristopher K Wright0Ben Larson1Tyler J Lark2Holly K Gibbs3Natural Resources Research Institute (NRRI) , University of Minnesota Duluth, 5013 Miller Trunk Highway, Duluth, MN, 55811, United States of America; Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.National Wildlife Federation , 1990 K Street NW, Suite 430, Washington, DC, 20006, United States of AmericaNelson Institute Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE) , University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1710 University Avenue, Madison, WI, 53726, United States of AmericaNelson Institute Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE) , University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1710 University Avenue, Madison, WI, 53726, United States of AmericaAlthough the United States has pursued rapid development of corn ethanol as a matter of national biofuel policy, relatively little is known about this policy’s widespread impacts on agricultural land conversion surrounding ethanol refineries. This knowledge gap impedes policy makers’ ability to identify and mitigate potentially negative environmental impacts of ethanol production. We assessed changes to the landscape during initial implementation of the Renewable Fuel Standard v2 (RFS2) from 2008 to 2012 and found nearly 4.2 million acres of arable non-cropland converted to crops within 100 miles of refinery locations, including 3.6 million acres of converted grassland. Aggregated across all ethanol refineries, the rate of grassland conversion to cropland increased linearly with proximity to a refinery location. Despite this widespread conversion of the landscape, recent cropland expansion could have made only modest contributions to mandated increases in conventional biofuel capacity required by RFS2. Collectively, these findings demonstrate a shortcoming in the existing ‘aggregate compliance’ method for enforcing land protections in the RFS2 and suggest an alternative monitoring mechanism would be needed to appropriately capture the scale of observed land use changes.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6446renewable fuel standardethanolbiofuelland use changegrassland
spellingShingle Christopher K Wright
Ben Larson
Tyler J Lark
Holly K Gibbs
Recent grassland losses are concentrated around U.S. ethanol refineries
Environmental Research Letters
renewable fuel standard
ethanol
biofuel
land use change
grassland
title Recent grassland losses are concentrated around U.S. ethanol refineries
title_full Recent grassland losses are concentrated around U.S. ethanol refineries
title_fullStr Recent grassland losses are concentrated around U.S. ethanol refineries
title_full_unstemmed Recent grassland losses are concentrated around U.S. ethanol refineries
title_short Recent grassland losses are concentrated around U.S. ethanol refineries
title_sort recent grassland losses are concentrated around u s ethanol refineries
topic renewable fuel standard
ethanol
biofuel
land use change
grassland
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6446
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherkwright recentgrasslandlossesareconcentratedaroundusethanolrefineries
AT benlarson recentgrasslandlossesareconcentratedaroundusethanolrefineries
AT tylerjlark recentgrasslandlossesareconcentratedaroundusethanolrefineries
AT hollykgibbs recentgrasslandlossesareconcentratedaroundusethanolrefineries