Incorporating Science into the Environmental Policy Process: a Case Study from Washington State
The incorporation of science into environmental policy is a key concern at many levels of decision making. Various institutions have sought to standardize the protection of natural resources by requiring that decisions be made based on the "best available science." Here we present empirica...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2005-06-01
|
| Series: | Ecology and Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art35/ |
| _version_ | 1818581641990242304 |
|---|---|
| author | Tessa B. Francis Kara A. Whittaker Vivek Shandas April V. Mills Jessica K. Graybill |
| author_facet | Tessa B. Francis Kara A. Whittaker Vivek Shandas April V. Mills Jessica K. Graybill |
| author_sort | Tessa B. Francis |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The incorporation of science into environmental policy is a key concern at many levels of decision making. Various institutions have sought to standardize the protection of natural resources by requiring that decisions be made based on the "best available science." Here we present empirical data describing the incorporation of best available science in the land-use policy process on a local scale. Results are based on interviews with planners and others who conducted scientific reviews associated with a Washington State Growth Management Act amendment that requires the inclusion of best available science in protecting critical areas. Our results show that jurisdictions varied with respect to how they included science in their land-use policies. Specifically, we found that smaller jurisdictions were very reliant on scientific information provided by state agencies, communicated frequently with other jurisdictions and agencies, and most often let scientific information guide the policy development process. Medium-sized jurisdictions, in contrast, were more inwardly focused, relied predominantly on local information, communicated little with outsiders, and more often looked to political influences to guide the policy process. Large jurisdictions, including most counties, often generated their own best science, communicated with and often informed state agencies and other jurisdictions, and more often considered science first during the policy development process. Jurisdictions also differed in terms of how best available science was defined, and how jurisdictions dealt with conflicting scientific information. Our results provide empirical evidence of the variation with which best available science is used in environmental policies. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-16T07:36:44Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d2489809f56045d69df8f9ea549356c3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1708-3087 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-16T07:36:44Z |
| publishDate | 2005-06-01 |
| publisher | Resilience Alliance |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecology and Society |
| spelling | doaj.art-d2489809f56045d69df8f9ea549356c32022-12-21T22:39:12ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872005-06-011013510.5751/ES-01359-1001351359Incorporating Science into the Environmental Policy Process: a Case Study from Washington StateTessa B. Francis0Kara A. Whittaker1Vivek Shandas2April V. Mills3Jessica K. Graybill4University of WashingtonUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of WashingtonThe incorporation of science into environmental policy is a key concern at many levels of decision making. Various institutions have sought to standardize the protection of natural resources by requiring that decisions be made based on the "best available science." Here we present empirical data describing the incorporation of best available science in the land-use policy process on a local scale. Results are based on interviews with planners and others who conducted scientific reviews associated with a Washington State Growth Management Act amendment that requires the inclusion of best available science in protecting critical areas. Our results show that jurisdictions varied with respect to how they included science in their land-use policies. Specifically, we found that smaller jurisdictions were very reliant on scientific information provided by state agencies, communicated frequently with other jurisdictions and agencies, and most often let scientific information guide the policy development process. Medium-sized jurisdictions, in contrast, were more inwardly focused, relied predominantly on local information, communicated little with outsiders, and more often looked to political influences to guide the policy process. Large jurisdictions, including most counties, often generated their own best science, communicated with and often informed state agencies and other jurisdictions, and more often considered science first during the policy development process. Jurisdictions also differed in terms of how best available science was defined, and how jurisdictions dealt with conflicting scientific information. Our results provide empirical evidence of the variation with which best available science is used in environmental policies.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art35/best available sciencecritical areas ordinanceenvironmental policyGrowth Management Actland-use planningWashington State |
| spellingShingle | Tessa B. Francis Kara A. Whittaker Vivek Shandas April V. Mills Jessica K. Graybill Incorporating Science into the Environmental Policy Process: a Case Study from Washington State Ecology and Society best available science critical areas ordinance environmental policy Growth Management Act land-use planning Washington State |
| title | Incorporating Science into the Environmental Policy Process: a Case Study from Washington State |
| title_full | Incorporating Science into the Environmental Policy Process: a Case Study from Washington State |
| title_fullStr | Incorporating Science into the Environmental Policy Process: a Case Study from Washington State |
| title_full_unstemmed | Incorporating Science into the Environmental Policy Process: a Case Study from Washington State |
| title_short | Incorporating Science into the Environmental Policy Process: a Case Study from Washington State |
| title_sort | incorporating science into the environmental policy process a case study from washington state |
| topic | best available science critical areas ordinance environmental policy Growth Management Act land-use planning Washington State |
| url | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art35/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tessabfrancis incorporatingscienceintotheenvironmentalpolicyprocessacasestudyfromwashingtonstate AT karaawhittaker incorporatingscienceintotheenvironmentalpolicyprocessacasestudyfromwashingtonstate AT vivekshandas incorporatingscienceintotheenvironmentalpolicyprocessacasestudyfromwashingtonstate AT aprilvmills incorporatingscienceintotheenvironmentalpolicyprocessacasestudyfromwashingtonstate AT jessicakgraybill incorporatingscienceintotheenvironmentalpolicyprocessacasestudyfromwashingtonstate |