Effect of Chia and Teff Supplement on Dietary Fibre Content, Non‑fermented Dough and Bread Characteristics from Wheat and Wheat‑Barley Flours
To elevate dietary fibre content in wheat bread, two additions of barley flour were tested (30 % and 50 %), and further 5 % or 10 % of chia or teff wholemeals. Chia elevated dietary fibre content more effectively than teff did (up to 6.41 % and 4.29 %, respectively). Non‑gluten nature of proteins in...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Mendel University Press
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://acta.mendelu.cz/65/2/0727/ |
_version_ | 1818178751781928960 |
---|---|
author | Ivan Švec Marie Hrušková |
author_facet | Ivan Švec Marie Hrušková |
author_sort | Ivan Švec |
collection | DOAJ |
description | To elevate dietary fibre content in wheat bread, two additions of barley flour were tested (30 % and 50 %), and further 5 % or 10 % of chia or teff wholemeals. Chia elevated dietary fibre content more effectively than teff did (up to 6.41 % and 4.29 %, respectively). Non‑gluten nature of proteins in non‑traditional raw materials also affected farinograph, amylograph and mixolab proof results. Water absorption increased about 10 % in total, especially owing to teff presence in composite flour. All three alternative crops decelerated dough development and prolonged its stability, but dough softening degree depended on their combination. Higher water absorption was reflected in viscosity rise during amylograph testing. Using mixolab equipment, significantly more accurate differentiation of tested composites was reached, both in phase of dough kneading and registration of viscosity during heating and cooling. Contrary to this, any statistically verifiable difference was observed between chia or teff wholemeal variants from white of dark seeds. By variance analysis, some rheological parameters (dough softening degree, torque point C5, mixolab energy) together with specific bread volume were identified as principal for samples distinguishing. In terms of flour and bread quality, barley flour portion had a prevailing effect for chia tri‑composites. Reversely, quality of flour blends containing teff was dependent on both barley flour and teff wholemeal portion and type. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T20:52:58Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d24b0676114842a5ba9040f50a35b138 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1211-8516 2464-8310 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T20:52:58Z |
publishDate | 2017-01-01 |
publisher | Mendel University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis |
spelling | doaj.art-d24b0676114842a5ba9040f50a35b1382022-12-22T00:51:11ZengMendel University PressActa Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis1211-85162464-83102017-01-0165272773610.11118/actaun201765020727Effect of Chia and Teff Supplement on Dietary Fibre Content, Non‑fermented Dough and Bread Characteristics from Wheat and Wheat‑Barley FloursIvan Švec0Marie Hrušková1Department of Carbohydrates and Cereals, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech RepublicDepartment of Carbohydrates and Cereals, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech RepublicTo elevate dietary fibre content in wheat bread, two additions of barley flour were tested (30 % and 50 %), and further 5 % or 10 % of chia or teff wholemeals. Chia elevated dietary fibre content more effectively than teff did (up to 6.41 % and 4.29 %, respectively). Non‑gluten nature of proteins in non‑traditional raw materials also affected farinograph, amylograph and mixolab proof results. Water absorption increased about 10 % in total, especially owing to teff presence in composite flour. All three alternative crops decelerated dough development and prolonged its stability, but dough softening degree depended on their combination. Higher water absorption was reflected in viscosity rise during amylograph testing. Using mixolab equipment, significantly more accurate differentiation of tested composites was reached, both in phase of dough kneading and registration of viscosity during heating and cooling. Contrary to this, any statistically verifiable difference was observed between chia or teff wholemeal variants from white of dark seeds. By variance analysis, some rheological parameters (dough softening degree, torque point C5, mixolab energy) together with specific bread volume were identified as principal for samples distinguishing. In terms of flour and bread quality, barley flour portion had a prevailing effect for chia tri‑composites. Reversely, quality of flour blends containing teff was dependent on both barley flour and teff wholemeal portion and type.https://acta.mendelu.cz/65/2/0727/wheat composite flourchia and teff wholemealmixolabbreadPCA |
spellingShingle | Ivan Švec Marie Hrušková Effect of Chia and Teff Supplement on Dietary Fibre Content, Non‑fermented Dough and Bread Characteristics from Wheat and Wheat‑Barley Flours Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis wheat composite flour chia and teff wholemeal mixolab bread PCA |
title | Effect of Chia and Teff Supplement on Dietary Fibre Content, Non‑fermented Dough and Bread Characteristics from Wheat and Wheat‑Barley Flours |
title_full | Effect of Chia and Teff Supplement on Dietary Fibre Content, Non‑fermented Dough and Bread Characteristics from Wheat and Wheat‑Barley Flours |
title_fullStr | Effect of Chia and Teff Supplement on Dietary Fibre Content, Non‑fermented Dough and Bread Characteristics from Wheat and Wheat‑Barley Flours |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Chia and Teff Supplement on Dietary Fibre Content, Non‑fermented Dough and Bread Characteristics from Wheat and Wheat‑Barley Flours |
title_short | Effect of Chia and Teff Supplement on Dietary Fibre Content, Non‑fermented Dough and Bread Characteristics from Wheat and Wheat‑Barley Flours |
title_sort | effect of chia and teff supplement on dietary fibre content non fermented dough and bread characteristics from wheat and wheat barley flours |
topic | wheat composite flour chia and teff wholemeal mixolab bread PCA |
url | https://acta.mendelu.cz/65/2/0727/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ivansvec effectofchiaandteffsupplementondietaryfibrecontentnonfermenteddoughandbreadcharacteristicsfromwheatandwheatbarleyflours AT mariehruskova effectofchiaandteffsupplementondietaryfibrecontentnonfermenteddoughandbreadcharacteristicsfromwheatandwheatbarleyflours |