Knowledge Argument versus Bundle Theory according to Derek Parfit
According to constitutive reductionism of Derek Parfit, a subject/person is not a separate existing being but his existence consists in the existence of a brain and body, performance of actions, thinking and occurrence of other physical and mental events. The identity of the subject in time comes do...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
2017-09-01
|
| Series: | Scientia et Fides |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://apcz.umk.pl/czasopisma/index.php/SetF/article/view/14365 |
| Summary: | According to constitutive reductionism of Derek Parfit, a subject/person is not a separate existing being but his existence consists in the existence of a brain and body, performance of actions, thinking and occurrence of other physical and mental events. The identity of the subject in time comes down only to “Relation R” - mental consistency and/or connectedness – elicited by appropriate reasons. In the following article, I will try, relying on Frank Johnson's Knowledge Argument, to argue in favour of the following conclusions: (1) a person/subject is a “fact”irreducible to body and physical relations with the environment and (2) a subject is something/”fact” non-reducible to mental occurrences. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2300-7648 2353-5636 |