COMMENTARY: OPEN ACCESS TO RESEARCH AND THE INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY OF RESEARCHERS

Readers of Language Learning & Technology are undoubtedly aware of the debate raging through the international research community about open (i.e., free) access to research and knowledge. As readers of the journal, we may not feel very concerned with this debate, because when LLT was establishe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thierry Chanier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Hawaii 2007-02-01
Series:Language Learning and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://llt.msu.edu/vol11num2/pdf/chanier.pdf
_version_ 1818156956481748992
author Thierry Chanier
author_facet Thierry Chanier
author_sort Thierry Chanier
collection DOAJ
description Readers of Language Learning & Technology are undoubtedly aware of the debate raging through the international research community about open (i.e., free) access to research and knowledge. As readers of the journal, we may not feel very concerned with this debate, because when LLT was established in 1997 (and ALSIC Journal in 1998) it seemed natural that articles should be freely accessible from every part of the network. But this perspective is misleading. First, it is important to recognize that LLT, Alsic, and 2000 open access (OA) journals are the exception and not the rule among the 25,000 peer-reviewed journals. Secondly, like it or not, we are directly concerned individually as researchers at several levels. * As readers, we face potential restrictions in access to publications and data in our field as well as to tools that could support our research and teaching. * As authors we seek being published not only in journals that have good reputations but also that have a large audience so that our work can be cited. Citation is becoming an important feature of the research evaluation process of individuals as well as of institutions, and OA offers an impact advantage (OpCit, 2006). * As citizens, when our salary and research are paid for out of public funds, we are often responsible for giving free access to our work as requested by research agencies, provided we can actually use our Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and not forfeit their use when signing publishers' copyrights agreements.We have the hardware and software solutions to guarantee open access. But social and economic models are well entrenched in the scientific publishing world. I would like to describe here, from a researcher’s standpoint, two ways to open access: the so called "green" and "gold" roads to OA (open archives and OA journals) and the obstacles that stand in the way.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T15:06:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d2587196f41243939676851f115c83d7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1094-3501
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T15:06:32Z
publishDate 2007-02-01
publisher University of Hawaii
record_format Article
series Language Learning and Technology
spelling doaj.art-d2587196f41243939676851f115c83d72022-12-22T01:00:53ZengUniversity of HawaiiLanguage Learning and Technology1094-35012007-02-01112142148COMMENTARY: OPEN ACCESS TO RESEARCH AND THE INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY OF RESEARCHERSThierry ChanierReaders of Language Learning & Technology are undoubtedly aware of the debate raging through the international research community about open (i.e., free) access to research and knowledge. As readers of the journal, we may not feel very concerned with this debate, because when LLT was established in 1997 (and ALSIC Journal in 1998) it seemed natural that articles should be freely accessible from every part of the network. But this perspective is misleading. First, it is important to recognize that LLT, Alsic, and 2000 open access (OA) journals are the exception and not the rule among the 25,000 peer-reviewed journals. Secondly, like it or not, we are directly concerned individually as researchers at several levels. * As readers, we face potential restrictions in access to publications and data in our field as well as to tools that could support our research and teaching. * As authors we seek being published not only in journals that have good reputations but also that have a large audience so that our work can be cited. Citation is becoming an important feature of the research evaluation process of individuals as well as of institutions, and OA offers an impact advantage (OpCit, 2006). * As citizens, when our salary and research are paid for out of public funds, we are often responsible for giving free access to our work as requested by research agencies, provided we can actually use our Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and not forfeit their use when signing publishers' copyrights agreements.We have the hardware and software solutions to guarantee open access. But social and economic models are well entrenched in the scientific publishing world. I would like to describe here, from a researcher’s standpoint, two ways to open access: the so called "green" and "gold" roads to OA (open archives and OA journals) and the obstacles that stand in the way.http://llt.msu.edu/vol11num2/pdf/chanier.pdfResearch Methods
spellingShingle Thierry Chanier
COMMENTARY: OPEN ACCESS TO RESEARCH AND THE INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY OF RESEARCHERS
Language Learning and Technology
Research Methods
title COMMENTARY: OPEN ACCESS TO RESEARCH AND THE INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY OF RESEARCHERS
title_full COMMENTARY: OPEN ACCESS TO RESEARCH AND THE INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY OF RESEARCHERS
title_fullStr COMMENTARY: OPEN ACCESS TO RESEARCH AND THE INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY OF RESEARCHERS
title_full_unstemmed COMMENTARY: OPEN ACCESS TO RESEARCH AND THE INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY OF RESEARCHERS
title_short COMMENTARY: OPEN ACCESS TO RESEARCH AND THE INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY OF RESEARCHERS
title_sort commentary open access to research and the individual responsibility of researchers
topic Research Methods
url http://llt.msu.edu/vol11num2/pdf/chanier.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT thierrychanier commentaryopenaccesstoresearchandtheindividualresponsibilityofresearchers