Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation

Abstract Background In radiotherapy, minimizing the time between referral and start of treatment (waiting time) is important to possibly mitigate tumor growth and avoid psychological distress in cancer patients. Radiotherapy pre-treatment workflow is driven by the scheduling of the first irradiation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bruno Vieira, Derya Demirtas, Jeroen B. van de Kamer, Erwin W. Hans, Wim van Harten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-10-01
Series:BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-019-0910-0
_version_ 1818217760424984576
author Bruno Vieira
Derya Demirtas
Jeroen B. van de Kamer
Erwin W. Hans
Wim van Harten
author_facet Bruno Vieira
Derya Demirtas
Jeroen B. van de Kamer
Erwin W. Hans
Wim van Harten
author_sort Bruno Vieira
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background In radiotherapy, minimizing the time between referral and start of treatment (waiting time) is important to possibly mitigate tumor growth and avoid psychological distress in cancer patients. Radiotherapy pre-treatment workflow is driven by the scheduling of the first irradiation session, which is usually set right after consultation (pull strategy) or can alternatively be set after the pre-treatment workflow has been completed (push strategy). The objective of this study is to assess the impact of using pull and push strategies and explore alternative interventions for improving timeliness in radiotherapy. Methods Discrete-event simulation is used to model the patient flow of a large radiotherapy department of a Dutch hospital. A staff survey, interviews with managers, and historical data from 2017 are used to generate model inputs, in which fluctuations in patient inflow and resource availability are considered. Results A hybrid (40% pull / 60% push) strategy representing the current practice (baseline case) leads to 12% lower average waiting times and 48% fewer first appointment rebooks when compared to a full pull strategy, which in turn leads to 41% fewer patients breaching the waiting time targets. An additional scenario analysis performed on the baseline case showed that spreading consultation slots evenly throughout the week can provide a 21% reduction in waiting times. Conclusions A 100% pull strategy allows for more patients starting treatment within the waiting time targets than a hybrid strategy, in spite of slightly longer waiting times and more first appointment rebooks. Our algorithm can be used by radiotherapy policy makers to identify the optimal balance between push and pull strategies to ensure timely treatments while providing patient-centered care adapted to their specific conditions.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T07:12:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d25a29e86c8f4705811eb2c899c872c5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6947
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T07:12:59Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-d25a29e86c8f4705811eb2c899c872c52022-12-22T00:33:35ZengBMCBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making1472-69472019-10-0119111310.1186/s12911-019-0910-0Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulationBruno Vieira0Derya Demirtas1Jeroen B. van de Kamer2Erwin W. Hans3Wim van Harten4Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalCenter for Healthcare Operations Improvement and Research (CHOIR), University of TwenteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalCenter for Healthcare Operations Improvement and Research (CHOIR), University of TwenteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalAbstract Background In radiotherapy, minimizing the time between referral and start of treatment (waiting time) is important to possibly mitigate tumor growth and avoid psychological distress in cancer patients. Radiotherapy pre-treatment workflow is driven by the scheduling of the first irradiation session, which is usually set right after consultation (pull strategy) or can alternatively be set after the pre-treatment workflow has been completed (push strategy). The objective of this study is to assess the impact of using pull and push strategies and explore alternative interventions for improving timeliness in radiotherapy. Methods Discrete-event simulation is used to model the patient flow of a large radiotherapy department of a Dutch hospital. A staff survey, interviews with managers, and historical data from 2017 are used to generate model inputs, in which fluctuations in patient inflow and resource availability are considered. Results A hybrid (40% pull / 60% push) strategy representing the current practice (baseline case) leads to 12% lower average waiting times and 48% fewer first appointment rebooks when compared to a full pull strategy, which in turn leads to 41% fewer patients breaching the waiting time targets. An additional scenario analysis performed on the baseline case showed that spreading consultation slots evenly throughout the week can provide a 21% reduction in waiting times. Conclusions A 100% pull strategy allows for more patients starting treatment within the waiting time targets than a hybrid strategy, in spite of slightly longer waiting times and more first appointment rebooks. Our algorithm can be used by radiotherapy policy makers to identify the optimal balance between push and pull strategies to ensure timely treatments while providing patient-centered care adapted to their specific conditions.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-019-0910-0Workflow controlRadiotherapyDiscrete-event simulationResource planningWaiting times
spellingShingle Bruno Vieira
Derya Demirtas
Jeroen B. van de Kamer
Erwin W. Hans
Wim van Harten
Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Workflow control
Radiotherapy
Discrete-event simulation
Resource planning
Waiting times
title Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation
title_full Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation
title_fullStr Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation
title_full_unstemmed Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation
title_short Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation
title_sort improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete event simulation
topic Workflow control
Radiotherapy
Discrete-event simulation
Resource planning
Waiting times
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-019-0910-0
work_keys_str_mv AT brunovieira improvingworkflowcontrolinradiotherapyusingdiscreteeventsimulation
AT deryademirtas improvingworkflowcontrolinradiotherapyusingdiscreteeventsimulation
AT jeroenbvandekamer improvingworkflowcontrolinradiotherapyusingdiscreteeventsimulation
AT erwinwhans improvingworkflowcontrolinradiotherapyusingdiscreteeventsimulation
AT wimvanharten improvingworkflowcontrolinradiotherapyusingdiscreteeventsimulation