Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of a dual-hormone (DH [insulin and glucagon]) closed-loop system compared to a single-hormone (SH [insulin only]) closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.MethodsThis was a 26-hour, two-period, randomized, crossover, inpatient study involving...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emilie Bundgaard Lindkvist, Christian Laugesen, Asbjørn Thode Reenberg, Tobias Kasper Skov Ritschel, Jannet Svensson, John Bagterp Jørgensen, Kirsten Nørgaard, Ajenthen G. Ranjan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Endocrinology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1073388/full
_version_ 1797945498978484224
author Emilie Bundgaard Lindkvist
Emilie Bundgaard Lindkvist
Christian Laugesen
Christian Laugesen
Asbjørn Thode Reenberg
Tobias Kasper Skov Ritschel
Jannet Svensson
Jannet Svensson
John Bagterp Jørgensen
Kirsten Nørgaard
Kirsten Nørgaard
Ajenthen G. Ranjan
Ajenthen G. Ranjan
author_facet Emilie Bundgaard Lindkvist
Emilie Bundgaard Lindkvist
Christian Laugesen
Christian Laugesen
Asbjørn Thode Reenberg
Tobias Kasper Skov Ritschel
Jannet Svensson
Jannet Svensson
John Bagterp Jørgensen
Kirsten Nørgaard
Kirsten Nørgaard
Ajenthen G. Ranjan
Ajenthen G. Ranjan
author_sort Emilie Bundgaard Lindkvist
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of a dual-hormone (DH [insulin and glucagon]) closed-loop system compared to a single-hormone (SH [insulin only]) closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.MethodsThis was a 26-hour, two-period, randomized, crossover, inpatient study involving 11 adolescents with type 1 diabetes (nine males [82%], mean ± SD age 14.8 ± 1.4 years, diabetes duration 5.7 ± 2.3 years). Except for the treatment configuration of the DiaCon Artificial Pancreas: DH or SH, experimental visits were identical consisting of: an overnight stay (10:00 pm until 7:30 am), several meals/snacks, and a 45-minute bout of moderate intensity continuous exercise. The primary endpoint was percentage of time spent with sensor glucose values below range (TBR [<3.9 mmol/L]) during closed-loop control over the 26-h period (5:00 pm, day 1 to 7:00 pm, day 2).ResultsOverall, there were no differences between DH and SH for the following glycemic outcomes (median [IQR]): TBR 1.6 [0.0, 2.4] vs. 1.28 [0.16, 3.19]%, p=1.00; time in range (TIR [3.9-10.0 mmol/L]) 68.4 [48.7, 76.8] vs. 75.7 [69.8, 87.1]%, p=0.08; and time above range (TAR [>10.0 mmol/L]) 28.1 [18.1, 49.8] vs. 23.3 [12.3, 27.2]%, p=0.10. Mean ( ± SD) glucose was higher during DH than SH (8.7 ( ± 3.2) vs. 8.1 ( ± 3.0) mmol/L, p<0.001) but coefficient of variation was similar (34.8 ( ± 6.8) vs. 37.3 ( ± 8.6)%, p=0.20). The average amount of rescue carbohydrates was similar between DH and SH (6.8 ( ± 12.3) vs. 9.5 ( ± 15.4) grams/participant/visit, p=0.78). Overnight, TIR was higher, TAR was lower during the SH visit compared to DH. During and after exercise (4:30 pm until 7 pm) the SH configuration produced higher TIR, but similar TAR and TBR compared to the DH configuration.ConclusionsDH and SH performed similarly in adolescents with type 1 diabetes during a 26-hour inpatient monitoring period involving several metabolic challenges including feeding and exercise. However, during the night and around exercise, the SH configuration outperformed DH.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T20:56:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d25ce64ed54e433bb34183579bfdbf77
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2392
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T20:56:05Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Endocrinology
spelling doaj.art-d25ce64ed54e433bb34183579bfdbf772023-01-23T05:42:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Endocrinology1664-23922023-01-011410.3389/fendo.2023.10733881073388Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trialEmilie Bundgaard Lindkvist0Emilie Bundgaard Lindkvist1Christian Laugesen2Christian Laugesen3Asbjørn Thode Reenberg4Tobias Kasper Skov Ritschel5Jannet Svensson6Jannet Svensson7John Bagterp Jørgensen8Kirsten Nørgaard9Kirsten Nørgaard10Ajenthen G. Ranjan11Ajenthen G. Ranjan12Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, DenmarkDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkCopenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, DenmarkDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, DenmarkDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, DenmarkCopenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, DenmarkDepartment of Pediatrics, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Herlev, DenmarkDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, DenmarkCopenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, DenmarkDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkCopenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, DenmarkDanish Diabetes Academy, Odense, DenmarkObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of a dual-hormone (DH [insulin and glucagon]) closed-loop system compared to a single-hormone (SH [insulin only]) closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.MethodsThis was a 26-hour, two-period, randomized, crossover, inpatient study involving 11 adolescents with type 1 diabetes (nine males [82%], mean ± SD age 14.8 ± 1.4 years, diabetes duration 5.7 ± 2.3 years). Except for the treatment configuration of the DiaCon Artificial Pancreas: DH or SH, experimental visits were identical consisting of: an overnight stay (10:00 pm until 7:30 am), several meals/snacks, and a 45-minute bout of moderate intensity continuous exercise. The primary endpoint was percentage of time spent with sensor glucose values below range (TBR [<3.9 mmol/L]) during closed-loop control over the 26-h period (5:00 pm, day 1 to 7:00 pm, day 2).ResultsOverall, there were no differences between DH and SH for the following glycemic outcomes (median [IQR]): TBR 1.6 [0.0, 2.4] vs. 1.28 [0.16, 3.19]%, p=1.00; time in range (TIR [3.9-10.0 mmol/L]) 68.4 [48.7, 76.8] vs. 75.7 [69.8, 87.1]%, p=0.08; and time above range (TAR [>10.0 mmol/L]) 28.1 [18.1, 49.8] vs. 23.3 [12.3, 27.2]%, p=0.10. Mean ( ± SD) glucose was higher during DH than SH (8.7 ( ± 3.2) vs. 8.1 ( ± 3.0) mmol/L, p<0.001) but coefficient of variation was similar (34.8 ( ± 6.8) vs. 37.3 ( ± 8.6)%, p=0.20). The average amount of rescue carbohydrates was similar between DH and SH (6.8 ( ± 12.3) vs. 9.5 ( ± 15.4) grams/participant/visit, p=0.78). Overnight, TIR was higher, TAR was lower during the SH visit compared to DH. During and after exercise (4:30 pm until 7 pm) the SH configuration produced higher TIR, but similar TAR and TBR compared to the DH configuration.ConclusionsDH and SH performed similarly in adolescents with type 1 diabetes during a 26-hour inpatient monitoring period involving several metabolic challenges including feeding and exercise. However, during the night and around exercise, the SH configuration outperformed DH.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1073388/fulltype 1 diabetes mellitusadolescentsdual-hormoneadvanced hybrid closed-loopartificial pancreasnon-linear model predictive control
spellingShingle Emilie Bundgaard Lindkvist
Emilie Bundgaard Lindkvist
Christian Laugesen
Christian Laugesen
Asbjørn Thode Reenberg
Tobias Kasper Skov Ritschel
Jannet Svensson
Jannet Svensson
John Bagterp Jørgensen
Kirsten Nørgaard
Kirsten Nørgaard
Ajenthen G. Ranjan
Ajenthen G. Ranjan
Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial
Frontiers in Endocrinology
type 1 diabetes mellitus
adolescents
dual-hormone
advanced hybrid closed-loop
artificial pancreas
non-linear model predictive control
title Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial
title_full Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial
title_fullStr Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial
title_full_unstemmed Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial
title_short Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial
title_sort performance of a dual hormone closed loop system versus insulin only closed loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes a single blind randomized controlled crossover trial
topic type 1 diabetes mellitus
adolescents
dual-hormone
advanced hybrid closed-loop
artificial pancreas
non-linear model predictive control
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1073388/full
work_keys_str_mv AT emiliebundgaardlindkvist performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT emiliebundgaardlindkvist performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT christianlaugesen performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT christianlaugesen performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT asbjørnthodereenberg performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT tobiaskasperskovritschel performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT jannetsvensson performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT jannetsvensson performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT johnbagterpjørgensen performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT kirstennørgaard performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT kirstennørgaard performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT ajenthengranjan performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT ajenthengranjan performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial