Market access agreements for pharmaceuticals in Europe: diversity of approaches and underlying concepts

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Market Access Agreements (MAA) between pharmaceutical industry and health care payers have been proliferating in Europe in the last years. MAA can be simple discounts from the list price or very sophisticated schemes with inarguably...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jarosławski Szymon, Toumi Mondher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-10-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/259
_version_ 1830215457593884672
author Jarosławski Szymon
Toumi Mondher
author_facet Jarosławski Szymon
Toumi Mondher
author_sort Jarosławski Szymon
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Market Access Agreements (MAA) between pharmaceutical industry and health care payers have been proliferating in Europe in the last years. MAA can be simple discounts from the list price or very sophisticated schemes with inarguably high administrative burden.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>We distinguished and defined from the health care payer perspective three kinds of MAA: Commercial Agreements (CA), Payment for Performance Agreements (P4P) and Coverage with Evidence Development (CED). Apart from CA, the agreements assumed collection and analysis of real-life health outcomes data, either from a cohort of patients (CED) or on per patient basis (P4P). We argue that while P4P aim at reducing drug cost to payers without a systematic approach to addressing uncertainty about drugs' value, CED were implemented provisionally to reduce payer's uncertainty about value of a medicine within a defined time period.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>We are of opinion that while CA and P4P have a potential to reduce payers' expenditure on costly drugs while maintaining a high list price, CED address initial uncertainty related to assessing the real-life value of new drugs and enable a final HTA recommendation or reimbursement and pricing decisions. Further, we suggest that real cost to health care payers of drugs in CA and P4P should be made publicly available in a systematic manner, to avoid a perverse impact of these MAA types on the international reference pricing system.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-18T06:56:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d262c86b66ce4e1f88218b5ed1a56d2d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T06:56:23Z
publishDate 2011-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-d262c86b66ce4e1f88218b5ed1a56d2d2022-12-21T21:17:10ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632011-10-0111125910.1186/1472-6963-11-259Market access agreements for pharmaceuticals in Europe: diversity of approaches and underlying conceptsJarosławski SzymonToumi Mondher<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Market Access Agreements (MAA) between pharmaceutical industry and health care payers have been proliferating in Europe in the last years. MAA can be simple discounts from the list price or very sophisticated schemes with inarguably high administrative burden.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>We distinguished and defined from the health care payer perspective three kinds of MAA: Commercial Agreements (CA), Payment for Performance Agreements (P4P) and Coverage with Evidence Development (CED). Apart from CA, the agreements assumed collection and analysis of real-life health outcomes data, either from a cohort of patients (CED) or on per patient basis (P4P). We argue that while P4P aim at reducing drug cost to payers without a systematic approach to addressing uncertainty about drugs' value, CED were implemented provisionally to reduce payer's uncertainty about value of a medicine within a defined time period.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>We are of opinion that while CA and P4P have a potential to reduce payers' expenditure on costly drugs while maintaining a high list price, CED address initial uncertainty related to assessing the real-life value of new drugs and enable a final HTA recommendation or reimbursement and pricing decisions. Further, we suggest that real cost to health care payers of drugs in CA and P4P should be made publicly available in a systematic manner, to avoid a perverse impact of these MAA types on the international reference pricing system.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/259
spellingShingle Jarosławski Szymon
Toumi Mondher
Market access agreements for pharmaceuticals in Europe: diversity of approaches and underlying concepts
BMC Health Services Research
title Market access agreements for pharmaceuticals in Europe: diversity of approaches and underlying concepts
title_full Market access agreements for pharmaceuticals in Europe: diversity of approaches and underlying concepts
title_fullStr Market access agreements for pharmaceuticals in Europe: diversity of approaches and underlying concepts
title_full_unstemmed Market access agreements for pharmaceuticals in Europe: diversity of approaches and underlying concepts
title_short Market access agreements for pharmaceuticals in Europe: diversity of approaches and underlying concepts
title_sort market access agreements for pharmaceuticals in europe diversity of approaches and underlying concepts
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/259
work_keys_str_mv AT jarosławskiszymon marketaccessagreementsforpharmaceuticalsineuropediversityofapproachesandunderlyingconcepts
AT toumimondher marketaccessagreementsforpharmaceuticalsineuropediversityofapproachesandunderlyingconcepts