Passenger Transport Energy Use in Ten Swedish Cities: Understanding the Differences through a Comparative Review
Energy conservation in the passenger transport sector of cities is an important policy matter. There is a long history of transport energy conservation, dating back to the first global oil crisis in 1973–1974, the importance and significance of which is explained briefly in this paper. Detailed empi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/14/3719 |
_version_ | 1797561978206552064 |
---|---|
author | Jeffrey R. Kenworthy |
author_facet | Jeffrey R. Kenworthy |
author_sort | Jeffrey R. Kenworthy |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Energy conservation in the passenger transport sector of cities is an important policy matter. There is a long history of transport energy conservation, dating back to the first global oil crisis in 1973–1974, the importance and significance of which is explained briefly in this paper. Detailed empirical data on private and public passenger transport energy use are provided for Sweden’s ten largest cities in 2015 (Stockholm, Göteborg, Malmö, Linköping, Helsingborg, Uppsala, Jönköping, Örebro, Västerås and Umeå), as well as Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany, which is a benchmark small city, well-known globally for its sustainability credentials, including mobility. These data on per capita energy use in private and public transport, as well as consumption rates per vehicle kilometer and passenger kilometer for every mode in each Swedish city and Freiburg, are compared with each other and with comprehensive earlier data on a large sample of US, Australian, Canadian, European and Asian cities. Swedish cities are found to have similar levels of per capita car use and energy use in private transport as those found in other European cities, but in the context of significantly lower densities. Possible reasons for the observed Swedish patterns are explored through detailed data on their land use, public and private transport infrastructure, and service and mobility characteristics. Relative to their comparatively low densities, Swedish cities are found to have healthy levels of public transport provision, relatively good public transport usage and very healthy levels of walking and cycling, all of which help to contribute to their moderate car use and energy use. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T18:22:12Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d26e45af6bc54f6a9b9c32cef4c39af0 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1996-1073 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T18:22:12Z |
publishDate | 2020-07-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Energies |
spelling | doaj.art-d26e45af6bc54f6a9b9c32cef4c39af02023-11-20T07:17:27ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-07-011314371910.3390/en13143719Passenger Transport Energy Use in Ten Swedish Cities: Understanding the Differences through a Comparative ReviewJeffrey R. Kenworthy0Fachbereich 1, Architektur, Bauingenieurwesen and Geomatik, Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Nibelungenplatz 1, 60318 Frankfurt am Main, GermanyEnergy conservation in the passenger transport sector of cities is an important policy matter. There is a long history of transport energy conservation, dating back to the first global oil crisis in 1973–1974, the importance and significance of which is explained briefly in this paper. Detailed empirical data on private and public passenger transport energy use are provided for Sweden’s ten largest cities in 2015 (Stockholm, Göteborg, Malmö, Linköping, Helsingborg, Uppsala, Jönköping, Örebro, Västerås and Umeå), as well as Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany, which is a benchmark small city, well-known globally for its sustainability credentials, including mobility. These data on per capita energy use in private and public transport, as well as consumption rates per vehicle kilometer and passenger kilometer for every mode in each Swedish city and Freiburg, are compared with each other and with comprehensive earlier data on a large sample of US, Australian, Canadian, European and Asian cities. Swedish cities are found to have similar levels of per capita car use and energy use in private transport as those found in other European cities, but in the context of significantly lower densities. Possible reasons for the observed Swedish patterns are explored through detailed data on their land use, public and private transport infrastructure, and service and mobility characteristics. Relative to their comparatively low densities, Swedish cities are found to have healthy levels of public transport provision, relatively good public transport usage and very healthy levels of walking and cycling, all of which help to contribute to their moderate car use and energy use.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/14/3719Swedish citiespassenger transport energy useurban formtransport infrastructuremobility patternspublic transport |
spellingShingle | Jeffrey R. Kenworthy Passenger Transport Energy Use in Ten Swedish Cities: Understanding the Differences through a Comparative Review Energies Swedish cities passenger transport energy use urban form transport infrastructure mobility patterns public transport |
title | Passenger Transport Energy Use in Ten Swedish Cities: Understanding the Differences through a Comparative Review |
title_full | Passenger Transport Energy Use in Ten Swedish Cities: Understanding the Differences through a Comparative Review |
title_fullStr | Passenger Transport Energy Use in Ten Swedish Cities: Understanding the Differences through a Comparative Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Passenger Transport Energy Use in Ten Swedish Cities: Understanding the Differences through a Comparative Review |
title_short | Passenger Transport Energy Use in Ten Swedish Cities: Understanding the Differences through a Comparative Review |
title_sort | passenger transport energy use in ten swedish cities understanding the differences through a comparative review |
topic | Swedish cities passenger transport energy use urban form transport infrastructure mobility patterns public transport |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/14/3719 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeffreyrkenworthy passengertransportenergyuseintenswedishcitiesunderstandingthedifferencesthroughacomparativereview |