Turkey meat quality (Meleagris gallopavo) submitted to different ventilation systems during fattening

The present investigation evaluated the quality of turkey meat produced in two production systems, according to the following parameters: water loss in cooking, drip water loss, texture (shear strength), pH, color, humidity, protein, ashes and lipids. A total of 200 turkey breast samples of 500 g, s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diego Francisco Marcon, Regiane Boaretto Crecencio, Tanize Angonesi de Castro, Leidiane Josi Budel, Francisco Javier Ramirez-Fernandez, Karina Ramirez Starikoff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade de São Paulo 2018-10-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/142527
_version_ 1811250936162549760
author Diego Francisco Marcon
Regiane Boaretto Crecencio
Tanize Angonesi de Castro
Leidiane Josi Budel
Francisco Javier Ramirez-Fernandez
Karina Ramirez Starikoff
author_facet Diego Francisco Marcon
Regiane Boaretto Crecencio
Tanize Angonesi de Castro
Leidiane Josi Budel
Francisco Javier Ramirez-Fernandez
Karina Ramirez Starikoff
author_sort Diego Francisco Marcon
collection DOAJ
description The present investigation evaluated the quality of turkey meat produced in two production systems, according to the following parameters: water loss in cooking, drip water loss, texture (shear strength), pH, color, humidity, protein, ashes and lipids. A total of 200 turkey breast samples of 500 g, separated by a batch of 20 samples, from ten aviaries from Santa Catarina, Brazil, were used: five from breeding with a traditional ventilation system and five with a mechanical ventilation system. Samples were obtained after slaughter and frozen at -15°C for 30 days. The results were submitted to variance analysis and the Tukey test. Significant differences were found only in the analysis of drip water loss. The birds of the traditional ventilation system presented 14.26% loss of water drip, while those of the ventilation exhaust system presented a loss of 19.21%. There were no differences in the chemical composition of poultry meat in relation to the production systems.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T16:12:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d28492404d0f43db87f1c7a404957ac9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1413-9596
1678-4456
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T16:12:13Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher Universidade de São Paulo
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
spelling doaj.art-d28492404d0f43db87f1c7a404957ac92022-12-22T03:25:52ZengUniversidade de São PauloBrazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science1413-95961678-44562018-10-0155310.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.142527Turkey meat quality (Meleagris gallopavo) submitted to different ventilation systems during fatteningDiego Francisco MarconRegiane Boaretto CrecencioTanize Angonesi de CastroLeidiane Josi BudelFrancisco Javier Ramirez-FernandezKarina Ramirez StarikoffThe present investigation evaluated the quality of turkey meat produced in two production systems, according to the following parameters: water loss in cooking, drip water loss, texture (shear strength), pH, color, humidity, protein, ashes and lipids. A total of 200 turkey breast samples of 500 g, separated by a batch of 20 samples, from ten aviaries from Santa Catarina, Brazil, were used: five from breeding with a traditional ventilation system and five with a mechanical ventilation system. Samples were obtained after slaughter and frozen at -15°C for 30 days. The results were submitted to variance analysis and the Tukey test. Significant differences were found only in the analysis of drip water loss. The birds of the traditional ventilation system presented 14.26% loss of water drip, while those of the ventilation exhaust system presented a loss of 19.21%. There were no differences in the chemical composition of poultry meat in relation to the production systems.http://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/142527Quality of turkey meatVentilation in the production of turkeysVentilation systemsMeleagris gallopavo
spellingShingle Diego Francisco Marcon
Regiane Boaretto Crecencio
Tanize Angonesi de Castro
Leidiane Josi Budel
Francisco Javier Ramirez-Fernandez
Karina Ramirez Starikoff
Turkey meat quality (Meleagris gallopavo) submitted to different ventilation systems during fattening
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
Quality of turkey meat
Ventilation in the production of turkeys
Ventilation systems
Meleagris gallopavo
title Turkey meat quality (Meleagris gallopavo) submitted to different ventilation systems during fattening
title_full Turkey meat quality (Meleagris gallopavo) submitted to different ventilation systems during fattening
title_fullStr Turkey meat quality (Meleagris gallopavo) submitted to different ventilation systems during fattening
title_full_unstemmed Turkey meat quality (Meleagris gallopavo) submitted to different ventilation systems during fattening
title_short Turkey meat quality (Meleagris gallopavo) submitted to different ventilation systems during fattening
title_sort turkey meat quality meleagris gallopavo submitted to different ventilation systems during fattening
topic Quality of turkey meat
Ventilation in the production of turkeys
Ventilation systems
Meleagris gallopavo
url http://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/142527
work_keys_str_mv AT diegofranciscomarcon turkeymeatqualitymeleagrisgallopavosubmittedtodifferentventilationsystemsduringfattening
AT regianeboarettocrecencio turkeymeatqualitymeleagrisgallopavosubmittedtodifferentventilationsystemsduringfattening
AT tanizeangonesidecastro turkeymeatqualitymeleagrisgallopavosubmittedtodifferentventilationsystemsduringfattening
AT leidianejosibudel turkeymeatqualitymeleagrisgallopavosubmittedtodifferentventilationsystemsduringfattening
AT franciscojavierramirezfernandez turkeymeatqualitymeleagrisgallopavosubmittedtodifferentventilationsystemsduringfattening
AT karinaramirezstarikoff turkeymeatqualitymeleagrisgallopavosubmittedtodifferentventilationsystemsduringfattening