On the Efficacy of Explicit Corrective Feedback on Descriptive Writing Accuracy of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners

Since the emergence of the process-oriented approach in second language writing instruction, the issues of writing instruction have been predominantly concerned with what and how error feedback should be given to the students’ writing. The present study investigated the effect of explicit corrective...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hooshang Khoshsima, Ma’soume Jahani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch 2013-09-01
Series:Research in English Language Pedagogy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://relp.khuisf.ac.ir/article_533594_5716e78ed01589f8b53960fa3c9d4cbb.pdf
_version_ 1811322251095572480
author Hooshang Khoshsima
Ma’soume Jahani
author_facet Hooshang Khoshsima
Ma’soume Jahani
author_sort Hooshang Khoshsima
collection DOAJ
description Since the emergence of the process-oriented approach in second language writing instruction, the issues of writing instruction have been predominantly concerned with what and how error feedback should be given to the students’ writing. The present study investigated the effect of explicit corrective feedback on writing accuracy of Iranian intermediate EFL learners (N = 44) in Hamedan Islamic Azad University. The three most frequent occurring errors in EFL learners’ writing pre-test were chosen to be targeted. Two groups were formed: the explicit corrective feedback group (N = 22), and the control group (N = 20). Paired samples t-tests revealed that both the explicit and control groups increased their writing accuracy in immediate post-test in comparison with pre-test, but Independent t-test indicated that there was not a statistically significant difference between the mean scores of the control and experiment groups (p = 0.65). In delayed post-test, there was no significant differences between writing accuracy of explicit and control groups (p = 0.72). Paired samples t-tests indicated that there was no significant accuracy mean difference between writing pre-test and delayed post-test of the explicit group.The writing accuracy gain of the control group in delayed post-test in comparison with writing pre-test was statistically significant.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T13:31:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d284d035fda34a4eb4f718ac78d7698a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2588-3259
2538-4244
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T13:31:51Z
publishDate 2013-09-01
publisher Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch
record_format Article
series Research in English Language Pedagogy
spelling doaj.art-d284d035fda34a4eb4f718ac78d7698a2022-12-22T02:44:57ZengIslamic Azad University, Isfahan BranchResearch in English Language Pedagogy2588-32592538-42442013-09-0112511533594On the Efficacy of Explicit Corrective Feedback on Descriptive Writing Accuracy of Iranian Intermediate EFL LearnersHooshang Khoshsima0Ma’soume Jahani1Chabahar Maritime UniversityChabahar Maritime UniversitySince the emergence of the process-oriented approach in second language writing instruction, the issues of writing instruction have been predominantly concerned with what and how error feedback should be given to the students’ writing. The present study investigated the effect of explicit corrective feedback on writing accuracy of Iranian intermediate EFL learners (N = 44) in Hamedan Islamic Azad University. The three most frequent occurring errors in EFL learners’ writing pre-test were chosen to be targeted. Two groups were formed: the explicit corrective feedback group (N = 22), and the control group (N = 20). Paired samples t-tests revealed that both the explicit and control groups increased their writing accuracy in immediate post-test in comparison with pre-test, but Independent t-test indicated that there was not a statistically significant difference between the mean scores of the control and experiment groups (p = 0.65). In delayed post-test, there was no significant differences between writing accuracy of explicit and control groups (p = 0.72). Paired samples t-tests indicated that there was no significant accuracy mean difference between writing pre-test and delayed post-test of the explicit group.The writing accuracy gain of the control group in delayed post-test in comparison with writing pre-test was statistically significant.http://relp.khuisf.ac.ir/article_533594_5716e78ed01589f8b53960fa3c9d4cbb.pdfCorrective feedbackExplicit Corrective FeedbackaccuracySecond/Foreign Language Acquisition
spellingShingle Hooshang Khoshsima
Ma’soume Jahani
On the Efficacy of Explicit Corrective Feedback on Descriptive Writing Accuracy of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners
Research in English Language Pedagogy
Corrective feedback
Explicit Corrective Feedback
accuracy
Second/Foreign Language Acquisition
title On the Efficacy of Explicit Corrective Feedback on Descriptive Writing Accuracy of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners
title_full On the Efficacy of Explicit Corrective Feedback on Descriptive Writing Accuracy of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners
title_fullStr On the Efficacy of Explicit Corrective Feedback on Descriptive Writing Accuracy of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners
title_full_unstemmed On the Efficacy of Explicit Corrective Feedback on Descriptive Writing Accuracy of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners
title_short On the Efficacy of Explicit Corrective Feedback on Descriptive Writing Accuracy of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners
title_sort on the efficacy of explicit corrective feedback on descriptive writing accuracy of iranian intermediate efl learners
topic Corrective feedback
Explicit Corrective Feedback
accuracy
Second/Foreign Language Acquisition
url http://relp.khuisf.ac.ir/article_533594_5716e78ed01589f8b53960fa3c9d4cbb.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hooshangkhoshsima ontheefficacyofexplicitcorrectivefeedbackondescriptivewritingaccuracyofiranianintermediateefllearners
AT masoumejahani ontheefficacyofexplicitcorrectivefeedbackondescriptivewritingaccuracyofiranianintermediateefllearners