The differences in the objective grading system index before and after dentoskeletal class I ortodontic treatment using the standard Edgewise appliances
Orthodontic treatment has a main purpose to reach balanced functional occlusion and create a harmonic esthetic face. But several studies indicates that orthodontic treatment influence smile esthetics, especially smile arc and buccal corridor. One-third of the treated patients showed a flat smile arc...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitas Padjadjaran
2014-11-01
|
| Series: | Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/pjd/article/view/14002 |
| _version_ | 1818431978414800896 |
|---|---|
| author | Endah Damaryanti Bergman Thahar Jono Salim Endah Mardiati |
| author_facet | Endah Damaryanti Bergman Thahar Jono Salim Endah Mardiati |
| author_sort | Endah Damaryanti |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Orthodontic treatment has a main purpose to reach balanced functional occlusion and create a harmonic esthetic face. But several studies indicates that orthodontic treatment influence smile esthetics, especially smile arc and buccal corridor. One-third of the treated patients showed a flat smile arc and orthodontic treatment with extraction resulted in excessive buccal corridors. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the difference of the Objective Grading System index, developed by the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) and smile aesthetics in patients with Class I dentoskeletal malocclusion before and after orthodontic treatment. Twenty dental casts, panoramic radiographs and grouped pre and post-treatment. Dental casts and panoramic radiographs are scored according to the guidelines of the Objective Grading System. Extra-oral photographs were assessed by researcher using modified Goldstein dentofacial analysis. Result of measurements were evaluated with statistical t-test. Results of the research indicates Objective Grading System index and also score of smile esthetics before and after orthodontic treatment shows difference statistically (for Objective Grading System index P = -1121 > 2.09 and for smile esthetics P = 5.15 > 2.09). But extremely weak relationship was found between Objective Grading System index and Aesthetics smiles (231). |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T15:57:53Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d28f88d29bcc421e9c63520c112ed91c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1979-0201 2549-6212 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T15:57:53Z |
| publishDate | 2014-11-01 |
| publisher | Universitas Padjadjaran |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry |
| spelling | doaj.art-d28f88d29bcc421e9c63520c112ed91c2022-12-21T22:55:14ZengUniversitas PadjadjaranPadjadjaran Journal of Dentistry1979-02012549-62122014-11-0126310.24198/pjd.vol26no3.140027785The differences in the objective grading system index before and after dentoskeletal class I ortodontic treatment using the standard Edgewise appliancesEndah Damaryanti0Bergman Thahar1Jono Salim2Endah Mardiati3Universitas PadjadjaranUniversitas PadjadjaranUniversitas PadjadjaranUniversitas PadjadjaranOrthodontic treatment has a main purpose to reach balanced functional occlusion and create a harmonic esthetic face. But several studies indicates that orthodontic treatment influence smile esthetics, especially smile arc and buccal corridor. One-third of the treated patients showed a flat smile arc and orthodontic treatment with extraction resulted in excessive buccal corridors. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the difference of the Objective Grading System index, developed by the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) and smile aesthetics in patients with Class I dentoskeletal malocclusion before and after orthodontic treatment. Twenty dental casts, panoramic radiographs and grouped pre and post-treatment. Dental casts and panoramic radiographs are scored according to the guidelines of the Objective Grading System. Extra-oral photographs were assessed by researcher using modified Goldstein dentofacial analysis. Result of measurements were evaluated with statistical t-test. Results of the research indicates Objective Grading System index and also score of smile esthetics before and after orthodontic treatment shows difference statistically (for Objective Grading System index P = -1121 > 2.09 and for smile esthetics P = 5.15 > 2.09). But extremely weak relationship was found between Objective Grading System index and Aesthetics smiles (231).http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/pjd/article/view/14002objective grading system index, smile esthetics, modified goldstein dentofacial analysis, class i dentoskeletal malocclusion. |
| spellingShingle | Endah Damaryanti Bergman Thahar Jono Salim Endah Mardiati The differences in the objective grading system index before and after dentoskeletal class I ortodontic treatment using the standard Edgewise appliances Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry objective grading system index, smile esthetics, modified goldstein dentofacial analysis, class i dentoskeletal malocclusion. |
| title | The differences in the objective grading system index before and after dentoskeletal class I ortodontic treatment using the standard Edgewise appliances |
| title_full | The differences in the objective grading system index before and after dentoskeletal class I ortodontic treatment using the standard Edgewise appliances |
| title_fullStr | The differences in the objective grading system index before and after dentoskeletal class I ortodontic treatment using the standard Edgewise appliances |
| title_full_unstemmed | The differences in the objective grading system index before and after dentoskeletal class I ortodontic treatment using the standard Edgewise appliances |
| title_short | The differences in the objective grading system index before and after dentoskeletal class I ortodontic treatment using the standard Edgewise appliances |
| title_sort | differences in the objective grading system index before and after dentoskeletal class i ortodontic treatment using the standard edgewise appliances |
| topic | objective grading system index, smile esthetics, modified goldstein dentofacial analysis, class i dentoskeletal malocclusion. |
| url | http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/pjd/article/view/14002 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT endahdamaryanti thedifferencesintheobjectivegradingsystemindexbeforeandafterdentoskeletalclassiortodontictreatmentusingthestandardedgewiseappliances AT bergmanthahar thedifferencesintheobjectivegradingsystemindexbeforeandafterdentoskeletalclassiortodontictreatmentusingthestandardedgewiseappliances AT jonosalim thedifferencesintheobjectivegradingsystemindexbeforeandafterdentoskeletalclassiortodontictreatmentusingthestandardedgewiseappliances AT endahmardiati thedifferencesintheobjectivegradingsystemindexbeforeandafterdentoskeletalclassiortodontictreatmentusingthestandardedgewiseappliances AT endahdamaryanti differencesintheobjectivegradingsystemindexbeforeandafterdentoskeletalclassiortodontictreatmentusingthestandardedgewiseappliances AT bergmanthahar differencesintheobjectivegradingsystemindexbeforeandafterdentoskeletalclassiortodontictreatmentusingthestandardedgewiseappliances AT jonosalim differencesintheobjectivegradingsystemindexbeforeandafterdentoskeletalclassiortodontictreatmentusingthestandardedgewiseappliances AT endahmardiati differencesintheobjectivegradingsystemindexbeforeandafterdentoskeletalclassiortodontictreatmentusingthestandardedgewiseappliances |