The Method of Rawls’ Theory of Justice: some Important Criticisms
Rawls’ theory of justice enjoys all characteristics of a comprehensive conceptual system, and like any such a system, it embraces a special method nature of which has a definite influence on the content of the theory. The main methodological concepts of his theory consist in the ideas of the contrac...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
2010-06-01
|
| Series: | حکمت و فلسفه |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_5804_1758c9fe53d48b8833a82c39a051c972.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797387553361362944 |
|---|---|
| author | yousef shaghol leysam sefid khosh |
| author_facet | yousef shaghol leysam sefid khosh |
| author_sort | yousef shaghol |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Rawls’ theory of justice enjoys all characteristics of a comprehensive conceptual system, and like any such a system, it embraces a special method nature of which has a definite influence on the content of the theory. The main methodological concepts of his theory consist in the ideas of the contract doctrine, the original position, the veil of ignorance and the reflective equilibrium. The content of these concepts and their relationships with each others and also with another relavant concepts in an cpmprehensive political theory is one of the most important qustions to which commentators and critics have payed attention. For instance, Doworkin has analized the relations between Rawlsian methodology right-based, goal-based and duty-based theories and aloso the constituitive and the natural model. Tomas Nigel is in about this claim that the final result derived from the Rawlsian method would lead to a just position. Calling Rwals` method a kind of `fictionalization`, Davide Hall has objected the possibility of actualization of this theory. In this paper, we try to focus on and categorize some important critical viwes conerning the Rawlsian methodology. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T22:25:56Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d291473442ec4b538bd87f91f9a97eef |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1735-3238 2476-6038 |
| language | fas |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T22:25:56Z |
| publishDate | 2010-06-01 |
| publisher | Allameh Tabataba'i University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | حکمت و فلسفه |
| spelling | doaj.art-d291473442ec4b538bd87f91f9a97eef2023-12-18T10:39:50ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University Pressحکمت و فلسفه1735-32382476-60382010-06-016229110310.22054/wph.2010.58045804The Method of Rawls’ Theory of Justice: some Important Criticismsyousef shaghol0leysam sefid khosh1هیئت علمی دانشگاه اصفهاندانشجوی دانشگاه شهید بهشتیRawls’ theory of justice enjoys all characteristics of a comprehensive conceptual system, and like any such a system, it embraces a special method nature of which has a definite influence on the content of the theory. The main methodological concepts of his theory consist in the ideas of the contract doctrine, the original position, the veil of ignorance and the reflective equilibrium. The content of these concepts and their relationships with each others and also with another relavant concepts in an cpmprehensive political theory is one of the most important qustions to which commentators and critics have payed attention. For instance, Doworkin has analized the relations between Rawlsian methodology right-based, goal-based and duty-based theories and aloso the constituitive and the natural model. Tomas Nigel is in about this claim that the final result derived from the Rawlsian method would lead to a just position. Calling Rwals` method a kind of `fictionalization`, Davide Hall has objected the possibility of actualization of this theory. In this paper, we try to focus on and categorize some important critical viwes conerning the Rawlsian methodology.https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_5804_1758c9fe53d48b8833a82c39a051c972.pdfthe methodology of rawls‘ theoryfictionalizationright-basedgoal-based and duty-based theoriesoriginal position |
| spellingShingle | yousef shaghol leysam sefid khosh The Method of Rawls’ Theory of Justice: some Important Criticisms حکمت و فلسفه the methodology of rawls‘ theory fictionalization right-based goal-based and duty-based theories original position |
| title | The Method of Rawls’ Theory of Justice: some Important Criticisms |
| title_full | The Method of Rawls’ Theory of Justice: some Important Criticisms |
| title_fullStr | The Method of Rawls’ Theory of Justice: some Important Criticisms |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Method of Rawls’ Theory of Justice: some Important Criticisms |
| title_short | The Method of Rawls’ Theory of Justice: some Important Criticisms |
| title_sort | method of rawls theory of justice some important criticisms |
| topic | the methodology of rawls‘ theory fictionalization right-based goal-based and duty-based theories original position |
| url | https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_5804_1758c9fe53d48b8833a82c39a051c972.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yousefshaghol themethodofrawlstheoryofjusticesomeimportantcriticisms AT leysamsefidkhosh themethodofrawlstheoryofjusticesomeimportantcriticisms AT yousefshaghol methodofrawlstheoryofjusticesomeimportantcriticisms AT leysamsefidkhosh methodofrawlstheoryofjusticesomeimportantcriticisms |