Characterising the severity of treatment resistance in unipolar and bipolar depression

Background Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is classically defined according to the number of suboptimal antidepressant responses experienced, but multidimensional assessments of TRD are emerging and may confer some advantages. Patient characteristics have been identified as risk factors for TRD...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachael W. Taylor, Rebecca Strawbridge, Allan H. Young, Roland Zahn, Anthony J. Cleare
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2021-11-01
Series:BJPsych Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056472421010048/type/journal_article
_version_ 1827995644296429568
author Rachael W. Taylor
Rebecca Strawbridge
Allan H. Young
Roland Zahn
Anthony J. Cleare
author_facet Rachael W. Taylor
Rebecca Strawbridge
Allan H. Young
Roland Zahn
Anthony J. Cleare
author_sort Rachael W. Taylor
collection DOAJ
description Background Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is classically defined according to the number of suboptimal antidepressant responses experienced, but multidimensional assessments of TRD are emerging and may confer some advantages. Patient characteristics have been identified as risk factors for TRD but may also be associated with TRD severity. The identification of individuals at risk of severe TRD would support appropriate prioritisation of intensive and specialist treatments. Aims To determine whether TRD risk factors are associated with TRD severity when assessed multidimensionally using the Maudsley Staging Method (MSM), and univariately as the number of antidepressant non-responses, across three cohorts of individuals with depression. Method Three cohorts of individuals without significant TRD, with established TRD and with severe TRD, were assessed (n = 528). Preselected characteristics were included in linear regressions to determine their association with each outcome. Results Participants with more severe TRD according to the MSM had a lower age at onset, fewer depressive episodes and more physical comorbidities. These associations were not consistent across cohorts. The number of episodes was associated with the number of antidepressant treatment failures, but the direction of association varied across the cohorts studied. Conclusions Several risk factors for TRD were associated with the severity of resistance according to the MSM. Fewer were associated with the raw number of inadequate antidepressant responses. Multidimensional definitions may be more useful for identifying patients at risk of severe TRD. The inconsistency of associations across cohorts has potential implications for the characterisation of TRD.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:59:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d29d0ac040164ca8b0d51d80a0d6c418
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2056-4724
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:59:34Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series BJPsych Open
spelling doaj.art-d29d0ac040164ca8b0d51d80a0d6c4182023-03-09T12:29:17ZengCambridge University PressBJPsych Open2056-47242021-11-01710.1192/bjo.2021.1004Characterising the severity of treatment resistance in unipolar and bipolar depressionRachael W. Taylor0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6471-537XRebecca Strawbridge1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2984-1124Allan H. Young2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2291-6952Roland Zahn3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8447-1453Anthony J. Cleare4The Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UKThe Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UKThe Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; and South London and Maudsley NHD Foundation Trust, UKThe Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; and South London and Maudsley NHD Foundation Trust, UKThe Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; and South London and Maudsley NHD Foundation Trust, UKBackground Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is classically defined according to the number of suboptimal antidepressant responses experienced, but multidimensional assessments of TRD are emerging and may confer some advantages. Patient characteristics have been identified as risk factors for TRD but may also be associated with TRD severity. The identification of individuals at risk of severe TRD would support appropriate prioritisation of intensive and specialist treatments. Aims To determine whether TRD risk factors are associated with TRD severity when assessed multidimensionally using the Maudsley Staging Method (MSM), and univariately as the number of antidepressant non-responses, across three cohorts of individuals with depression. Method Three cohorts of individuals without significant TRD, with established TRD and with severe TRD, were assessed (n = 528). Preselected characteristics were included in linear regressions to determine their association with each outcome. Results Participants with more severe TRD according to the MSM had a lower age at onset, fewer depressive episodes and more physical comorbidities. These associations were not consistent across cohorts. The number of episodes was associated with the number of antidepressant treatment failures, but the direction of association varied across the cohorts studied. Conclusions Several risk factors for TRD were associated with the severity of resistance according to the MSM. Fewer were associated with the raw number of inadequate antidepressant responses. Multidimensional definitions may be more useful for identifying patients at risk of severe TRD. The inconsistency of associations across cohorts has potential implications for the characterisation of TRD. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056472421010048/type/journal_articleDepressive disordersin-patient treatmentout-patient treatmentrating scalesindividual psychotherapy
spellingShingle Rachael W. Taylor
Rebecca Strawbridge
Allan H. Young
Roland Zahn
Anthony J. Cleare
Characterising the severity of treatment resistance in unipolar and bipolar depression
BJPsych Open
Depressive disorders
in-patient treatment
out-patient treatment
rating scales
individual psychotherapy
title Characterising the severity of treatment resistance in unipolar and bipolar depression
title_full Characterising the severity of treatment resistance in unipolar and bipolar depression
title_fullStr Characterising the severity of treatment resistance in unipolar and bipolar depression
title_full_unstemmed Characterising the severity of treatment resistance in unipolar and bipolar depression
title_short Characterising the severity of treatment resistance in unipolar and bipolar depression
title_sort characterising the severity of treatment resistance in unipolar and bipolar depression
topic Depressive disorders
in-patient treatment
out-patient treatment
rating scales
individual psychotherapy
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056472421010048/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT rachaelwtaylor characterisingtheseverityoftreatmentresistanceinunipolarandbipolardepression
AT rebeccastrawbridge characterisingtheseverityoftreatmentresistanceinunipolarandbipolardepression
AT allanhyoung characterisingtheseverityoftreatmentresistanceinunipolarandbipolardepression
AT rolandzahn characterisingtheseverityoftreatmentresistanceinunipolarandbipolardepression
AT anthonyjcleare characterisingtheseverityoftreatmentresistanceinunipolarandbipolardepression