Further Investigation of the Dimensionality of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being

The dimensionality of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being (QEWB) has been a topic of debate and divergent findings in the literature up to date. This study investigated the factor structure and measurement invariance of the QEWB in four culturally diverse South African samples using confirma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amanda Cromhout, Lusilda Schutte, Marié P. Wissing, Willem D. Schutte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.795770/full
_version_ 1818470306659958784
author Amanda Cromhout
Lusilda Schutte
Marié P. Wissing
Willem D. Schutte
author_facet Amanda Cromhout
Lusilda Schutte
Marié P. Wissing
Willem D. Schutte
author_sort Amanda Cromhout
collection DOAJ
description The dimensionality of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being (QEWB) has been a topic of debate and divergent findings in the literature up to date. This study investigated the factor structure and measurement invariance of the QEWB in four culturally diverse South African samples using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), bifactor CFA, exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM), and bifactor ESEM. Three student samples completed the English (n = 326), Afrikaans (n = 478), or Setswana (n = 260) version of the QEWB. An adult sample (n = 262) completed the English version. The one-factor structure revealed poor fit for the student samples. Although the four-factor models generally showed slightly better fit than the three-factor models, the latter was preferred for parsimony. The bifactor ESEM model displayed good fit for the student samples, with the general factor and some specific factors attaining sufficient reliability scores, pointing to the potential use of the scale in these samples. Configural invariance between the student samples was supported, but not metric nor scalar invariance. For the adult sample, none of the models displayed good fit and the use of the QEWB in this sample is not recommended. The results point towards the existence of a global eudaimonic well-being factor and, at the same time, the interrelatedness of facets of eudaimonic well-being. It suggests that eudaimonic well-being may be represented by the same items across the three student groups. The influence of developmental phase on the manifestation and measurement of eudaimonic well-being should be explored in future.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T21:35:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d29ea6ba6ca54edeadf68df36456b050
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T21:35:39Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-d29ea6ba6ca54edeadf68df36456b0502022-12-22T02:29:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782022-05-011310.3389/fpsyg.2022.795770795770Further Investigation of the Dimensionality of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-BeingAmanda Cromhout0Lusilda Schutte1Marié P. Wissing2Willem D. Schutte3Africa Unit for Transdisciplinary Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South AfricaAfrica Unit for Transdisciplinary Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South AfricaAfrica Unit for Transdisciplinary Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South AfricaCentre for Business Mathematics and Informatics, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South AfricaThe dimensionality of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being (QEWB) has been a topic of debate and divergent findings in the literature up to date. This study investigated the factor structure and measurement invariance of the QEWB in four culturally diverse South African samples using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), bifactor CFA, exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM), and bifactor ESEM. Three student samples completed the English (n = 326), Afrikaans (n = 478), or Setswana (n = 260) version of the QEWB. An adult sample (n = 262) completed the English version. The one-factor structure revealed poor fit for the student samples. Although the four-factor models generally showed slightly better fit than the three-factor models, the latter was preferred for parsimony. The bifactor ESEM model displayed good fit for the student samples, with the general factor and some specific factors attaining sufficient reliability scores, pointing to the potential use of the scale in these samples. Configural invariance between the student samples was supported, but not metric nor scalar invariance. For the adult sample, none of the models displayed good fit and the use of the QEWB in this sample is not recommended. The results point towards the existence of a global eudaimonic well-being factor and, at the same time, the interrelatedness of facets of eudaimonic well-being. It suggests that eudaimonic well-being may be represented by the same items across the three student groups. The influence of developmental phase on the manifestation and measurement of eudaimonic well-being should be explored in future.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.795770/fulleudaimonic well-beingfactorial validityreliabilitydimensionalitymeasurement invariancebifactor ESEM
spellingShingle Amanda Cromhout
Lusilda Schutte
Marié P. Wissing
Willem D. Schutte
Further Investigation of the Dimensionality of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being
Frontiers in Psychology
eudaimonic well-being
factorial validity
reliability
dimensionality
measurement invariance
bifactor ESEM
title Further Investigation of the Dimensionality of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being
title_full Further Investigation of the Dimensionality of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being
title_fullStr Further Investigation of the Dimensionality of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being
title_full_unstemmed Further Investigation of the Dimensionality of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being
title_short Further Investigation of the Dimensionality of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being
title_sort further investigation of the dimensionality of the questionnaire for eudaimonic well being
topic eudaimonic well-being
factorial validity
reliability
dimensionality
measurement invariance
bifactor ESEM
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.795770/full
work_keys_str_mv AT amandacromhout furtherinvestigationofthedimensionalityofthequestionnaireforeudaimonicwellbeing
AT lusildaschutte furtherinvestigationofthedimensionalityofthequestionnaireforeudaimonicwellbeing
AT mariepwissing furtherinvestigationofthedimensionalityofthequestionnaireforeudaimonicwellbeing
AT willemdschutte furtherinvestigationofthedimensionalityofthequestionnaireforeudaimonicwellbeing