Numerical Simulation of Gas-Solid Two-Phase Erosion for Elbow and Tee Pipe in Gas Field

Erosion caused by solid particles in a pipeline is one of the main problems endangering the safety production of the oil and gas industry, which may lead the equipment to malfunction or even fail. However, most of the previous studies focused on the standard elbow, and the erosion law of right-angle...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bingyuan Hong, Yanbo Li, Xiaoping Li, Shuaipeng Ji, Yafeng Yu, Di Fan, Yating Qian, Jian Guo, Jing Gong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6609
_version_ 1797514740398817280
author Bingyuan Hong
Yanbo Li
Xiaoping Li
Shuaipeng Ji
Yafeng Yu
Di Fan
Yating Qian
Jian Guo
Jing Gong
author_facet Bingyuan Hong
Yanbo Li
Xiaoping Li
Shuaipeng Ji
Yafeng Yu
Di Fan
Yating Qian
Jian Guo
Jing Gong
author_sort Bingyuan Hong
collection DOAJ
description Erosion caused by solid particles in a pipeline is one of the main problems endangering the safety production of the oil and gas industry, which may lead the equipment to malfunction or even fail. However, most of the previous studies focused on the standard elbow, and the erosion law of right-angle elbow and blind tee is rarely reported in the literature. This work aims to investigate the erosion law of different pipeline structures including 90° elbow, right-angle pipe, and tee pipe based on the production characteristics and engineering parameters of the gas field. An integrated CFD-DPM method is established including a realizable k-ε turbulence model, discrete phase model, and erosion rate prediction model. The accuracy of the model is evaluated by a series of experimental data of flow conditions of our previous work. Further, the erosion rate, pressure distributions, and particle trajectories in 90° elbow, right-angle pipe, and tee pipe under different flow velocities, particle mass flow rate, pipe diameter are investigated by applying the presented model. The results show that the blind tee has the most obvious growth rate, and the most serious erosion is located in the blind end of the pipe wall. The maximum erosion rate of the 1.5D is greater than that of the 3D elbow as a whole, and the 1.5D elbow is more concentrated in the serious erosion area. Furthermore, the erosion rate of the bend weld is much greater than that of the straight pipe weld. This study can provide a basis for the selection of different structural pipe fittings, thereby reducing the pipeline erosion rate and improving the integrity of the management of gas pipelines.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:36:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d2a49b0cc6e94838867c2b030361b859
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:36:02Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-d2a49b0cc6e94838867c2b030361b8592023-11-22T18:05:54ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-10-011420660910.3390/en14206609Numerical Simulation of Gas-Solid Two-Phase Erosion for Elbow and Tee Pipe in Gas FieldBingyuan Hong0Yanbo Li1Xiaoping Li2Shuaipeng Ji3Yafeng Yu4Di Fan5Yating Qian6Jian Guo7Jing Gong8National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Harbor Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation Technology/Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Pollution Control, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, ChinaNational Engineering Laboratory for Pipeline Safety/MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering/Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Oil and Gas Distribution Technology, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, ChinaNational Engineering Laboratory for Pipeline Safety/MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering/Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Oil and Gas Distribution Technology, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, ChinaNational Engineering Laboratory for Pipeline Safety/MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering/Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Oil and Gas Distribution Technology, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, ChinaNational Engineering Laboratory for Pipeline Safety/MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering/Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Oil and Gas Distribution Technology, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, ChinaChina Petroleum Engineering & Construction Corp, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100120, ChinaNational Engineering Laboratory for Pipeline Safety/MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering/Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Oil and Gas Distribution Technology, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, ChinaNational-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Harbor Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation Technology/Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Pollution Control, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, ChinaNational Engineering Laboratory for Pipeline Safety/MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering/Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Oil and Gas Distribution Technology, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, ChinaErosion caused by solid particles in a pipeline is one of the main problems endangering the safety production of the oil and gas industry, which may lead the equipment to malfunction or even fail. However, most of the previous studies focused on the standard elbow, and the erosion law of right-angle elbow and blind tee is rarely reported in the literature. This work aims to investigate the erosion law of different pipeline structures including 90° elbow, right-angle pipe, and tee pipe based on the production characteristics and engineering parameters of the gas field. An integrated CFD-DPM method is established including a realizable k-ε turbulence model, discrete phase model, and erosion rate prediction model. The accuracy of the model is evaluated by a series of experimental data of flow conditions of our previous work. Further, the erosion rate, pressure distributions, and particle trajectories in 90° elbow, right-angle pipe, and tee pipe under different flow velocities, particle mass flow rate, pipe diameter are investigated by applying the presented model. The results show that the blind tee has the most obvious growth rate, and the most serious erosion is located in the blind end of the pipe wall. The maximum erosion rate of the 1.5D is greater than that of the 3D elbow as a whole, and the 1.5D elbow is more concentrated in the serious erosion area. Furthermore, the erosion rate of the bend weld is much greater than that of the straight pipe weld. This study can provide a basis for the selection of different structural pipe fittings, thereby reducing the pipeline erosion rate and improving the integrity of the management of gas pipelines.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6609CFDelbow erosiontwo-phase flowDPMtee pipe
spellingShingle Bingyuan Hong
Yanbo Li
Xiaoping Li
Shuaipeng Ji
Yafeng Yu
Di Fan
Yating Qian
Jian Guo
Jing Gong
Numerical Simulation of Gas-Solid Two-Phase Erosion for Elbow and Tee Pipe in Gas Field
Energies
CFD
elbow erosion
two-phase flow
DPM
tee pipe
title Numerical Simulation of Gas-Solid Two-Phase Erosion for Elbow and Tee Pipe in Gas Field
title_full Numerical Simulation of Gas-Solid Two-Phase Erosion for Elbow and Tee Pipe in Gas Field
title_fullStr Numerical Simulation of Gas-Solid Two-Phase Erosion for Elbow and Tee Pipe in Gas Field
title_full_unstemmed Numerical Simulation of Gas-Solid Two-Phase Erosion for Elbow and Tee Pipe in Gas Field
title_short Numerical Simulation of Gas-Solid Two-Phase Erosion for Elbow and Tee Pipe in Gas Field
title_sort numerical simulation of gas solid two phase erosion for elbow and tee pipe in gas field
topic CFD
elbow erosion
two-phase flow
DPM
tee pipe
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6609
work_keys_str_mv AT bingyuanhong numericalsimulationofgassolidtwophaseerosionforelbowandteepipeingasfield
AT yanboli numericalsimulationofgassolidtwophaseerosionforelbowandteepipeingasfield
AT xiaopingli numericalsimulationofgassolidtwophaseerosionforelbowandteepipeingasfield
AT shuaipengji numericalsimulationofgassolidtwophaseerosionforelbowandteepipeingasfield
AT yafengyu numericalsimulationofgassolidtwophaseerosionforelbowandteepipeingasfield
AT difan numericalsimulationofgassolidtwophaseerosionforelbowandteepipeingasfield
AT yatingqian numericalsimulationofgassolidtwophaseerosionforelbowandteepipeingasfield
AT jianguo numericalsimulationofgassolidtwophaseerosionforelbowandteepipeingasfield
AT jinggong numericalsimulationofgassolidtwophaseerosionforelbowandteepipeingasfield