Estimation of Distances in 3D by Orthodontists Using Digital Models
In the field of orthodontics, digital dental arch models are increasingly replacing plaster models in orthodontic diagnostics. This change in interface from physical plaster models to digital image-based models raises the question of how orthodontists interpret intra- and inter-arch relationships fr...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-09-01
|
| Series: | Applied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/18/8285 |
| _version_ | 1797520417629405184 |
|---|---|
| author | Masrour Makaremi Bernard N’Kaoua |
| author_facet | Masrour Makaremi Bernard N’Kaoua |
| author_sort | Masrour Makaremi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In the field of orthodontics, digital dental arch models are increasingly replacing plaster models in orthodontic diagnostics. This change in interface from physical plaster models to digital image-based models raises the question of how orthodontists interpret intra- and inter-arch relationships from an image on a screen. In particular, the issue of the accuracy of the distances estimated on numerical models is crucial since the estimation of distances is the basis of the therapeutic decision-making process. Studies have shown that distances were well estimated on plaster models, but no study has verified this point on numerical models. This is the question that our study addresses. The experimental protocol consisted of collecting estimates of measurements made by orthodontists using digital models. The reliability of these measurements was then assessed by comparing them to the actual physical distances. We asked 31 orthodontists (19 women and 12 men; an average age of 37 years) to generate 3D model-based measurements of seven different elements: mandibular congestion, the maxillary intermolar distance, Spee’s curve, 16/26 symmetry, the right canine class, overbite, and overjet. These values were then compared to the actual measurements calculated using Insignia<sup>®</sup> software (ORMCO Corporation: Brea, CA, USA), using single sample <i>t</i>-tests. This test makes it possible to compare a distance estimated by the participants with a reference value, which corresponds here to the real distance. The results indicate that, overall, the distance estimates made on the 3D models differ significantly from the actual distances measured using the Insignia<sup>®</sup> software. This was particularly so for mandibular crowding (test value = 0; t (30) = 10.74; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01), test value = 1; t (30) = 6.23; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01). Although no study has focused on distance estimation on numerical models in the field of orthodontics, our results agree with the conclusions of studies showing that distances are not estimated in the same way in real environments and virtual environments. Additional studies will make it possible to identify more clearly the parameters (individual factors, equipment, etc.), which make it possible to improve the estimation of distances in the practice of orthodontics. In any case, these studies are necessary to improve the training of future practitioners in the use of virtual models for decision-making and to support them in the digital transition. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T07:56:29Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d2b2154c045f4dbcac1681412689de59 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2076-3417 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T07:56:29Z |
| publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Applied Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-d2b2154c045f4dbcac1681412689de592023-11-22T11:50:17ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-09-011118828510.3390/app11188285Estimation of Distances in 3D by Orthodontists Using Digital ModelsMasrour Makaremi0Bernard N’Kaoua1Handicap Activity Cognition Health, Bordeaux Population Health (BPH) U1219, Université de Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux, FranceDentofacial Orthopedics Department, UFR des Sciences Odontologiques, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux, FranceIn the field of orthodontics, digital dental arch models are increasingly replacing plaster models in orthodontic diagnostics. This change in interface from physical plaster models to digital image-based models raises the question of how orthodontists interpret intra- and inter-arch relationships from an image on a screen. In particular, the issue of the accuracy of the distances estimated on numerical models is crucial since the estimation of distances is the basis of the therapeutic decision-making process. Studies have shown that distances were well estimated on plaster models, but no study has verified this point on numerical models. This is the question that our study addresses. The experimental protocol consisted of collecting estimates of measurements made by orthodontists using digital models. The reliability of these measurements was then assessed by comparing them to the actual physical distances. We asked 31 orthodontists (19 women and 12 men; an average age of 37 years) to generate 3D model-based measurements of seven different elements: mandibular congestion, the maxillary intermolar distance, Spee’s curve, 16/26 symmetry, the right canine class, overbite, and overjet. These values were then compared to the actual measurements calculated using Insignia<sup>®</sup> software (ORMCO Corporation: Brea, CA, USA), using single sample <i>t</i>-tests. This test makes it possible to compare a distance estimated by the participants with a reference value, which corresponds here to the real distance. The results indicate that, overall, the distance estimates made on the 3D models differ significantly from the actual distances measured using the Insignia<sup>®</sup> software. This was particularly so for mandibular crowding (test value = 0; t (30) = 10.74; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01), test value = 1; t (30) = 6.23; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01). Although no study has focused on distance estimation on numerical models in the field of orthodontics, our results agree with the conclusions of studies showing that distances are not estimated in the same way in real environments and virtual environments. Additional studies will make it possible to identify more clearly the parameters (individual factors, equipment, etc.), which make it possible to improve the estimation of distances in the practice of orthodontics. In any case, these studies are necessary to improve the training of future practitioners in the use of virtual models for decision-making and to support them in the digital transition.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/18/8285orthodonticsdigital modelsvirtual realitydistance estimation |
| spellingShingle | Masrour Makaremi Bernard N’Kaoua Estimation of Distances in 3D by Orthodontists Using Digital Models Applied Sciences orthodontics digital models virtual reality distance estimation |
| title | Estimation of Distances in 3D by Orthodontists Using Digital Models |
| title_full | Estimation of Distances in 3D by Orthodontists Using Digital Models |
| title_fullStr | Estimation of Distances in 3D by Orthodontists Using Digital Models |
| title_full_unstemmed | Estimation of Distances in 3D by Orthodontists Using Digital Models |
| title_short | Estimation of Distances in 3D by Orthodontists Using Digital Models |
| title_sort | estimation of distances in 3d by orthodontists using digital models |
| topic | orthodontics digital models virtual reality distance estimation |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/18/8285 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT masrourmakaremi estimationofdistancesin3dbyorthodontistsusingdigitalmodels AT bernardnkaoua estimationofdistancesin3dbyorthodontistsusingdigitalmodels |