God’s Prime Directive: Non-Interference and Why There Is No (Viable) Free Will Defense

In a recent book and article, James Sterba has argued that there is no free will defense. It is the purpose of this article to show that, in the most technical sense, he is wrong. There is a version of the free will defense that can solve what Sterba (rightly) takes to be the most interesting and se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David Kyle Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/9/871
_version_ 1797482962295455744
author David Kyle Johnson
author_facet David Kyle Johnson
author_sort David Kyle Johnson
collection DOAJ
description In a recent book and article, James Sterba has argued that there is no free will defense. It is the purpose of this article to show that, in the most technical sense, he is wrong. There is a version of the free will defense that can solve what Sterba (rightly) takes to be the most interesting and severe version of the logical problem of moral evil. However, I will also argue that, in effect (or, we might say, in practice), Sterba is correct. The only working version of the free will defense requires embracing a view that entails consequences theists traditionally have not and cannot accept. Consequently, the one and only free will solution is not viable. Unless some other solution can be found (Sterba argues there is none), the logical problem of evil, as Sterba understands it, either commits one to atheism, or a version of theism that practically all theists would regard as a heresy.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T22:40:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d2b7d9ebee5349028b077b54b2313a56
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-1444
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T22:40:04Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj.art-d2b7d9ebee5349028b077b54b2313a562023-11-23T18:42:21ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442022-09-0113987110.3390/rel13090871God’s Prime Directive: Non-Interference and Why There Is No (Viable) Free Will DefenseDavid Kyle Johnson0Department of Philosophy, King’s College, Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711, USAIn a recent book and article, James Sterba has argued that there is no free will defense. It is the purpose of this article to show that, in the most technical sense, he is wrong. There is a version of the free will defense that can solve what Sterba (rightly) takes to be the most interesting and severe version of the logical problem of moral evil. However, I will also argue that, in effect (or, we might say, in practice), Sterba is correct. The only working version of the free will defense requires embracing a view that entails consequences theists traditionally have not and cannot accept. Consequently, the one and only free will solution is not viable. Unless some other solution can be found (Sterba argues there is none), the logical problem of evil, as Sterba understands it, either commits one to atheism, or a version of theism that practically all theists would regard as a heresy.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/9/871logical problem of moral evilJames Sterbaopen theismdivine non-interferencedivine prime directiveElif Nur Balci
spellingShingle David Kyle Johnson
God’s Prime Directive: Non-Interference and Why There Is No (Viable) Free Will Defense
Religions
logical problem of moral evil
James Sterba
open theism
divine non-interference
divine prime directive
Elif Nur Balci
title God’s Prime Directive: Non-Interference and Why There Is No (Viable) Free Will Defense
title_full God’s Prime Directive: Non-Interference and Why There Is No (Viable) Free Will Defense
title_fullStr God’s Prime Directive: Non-Interference and Why There Is No (Viable) Free Will Defense
title_full_unstemmed God’s Prime Directive: Non-Interference and Why There Is No (Viable) Free Will Defense
title_short God’s Prime Directive: Non-Interference and Why There Is No (Viable) Free Will Defense
title_sort god s prime directive non interference and why there is no viable free will defense
topic logical problem of moral evil
James Sterba
open theism
divine non-interference
divine prime directive
Elif Nur Balci
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/9/871
work_keys_str_mv AT davidkylejohnson godsprimedirectivenoninterferenceandwhythereisnoviablefreewilldefense