The role of phytoplankton dynamics in the seasonal and interannual variability of carbon in the subpolar North Atlantic – a modeling study
We developed an ecosystem/biogeochemical model system, which includes multiple phytoplankton functional groups and carbon cycle dynamics, and applied it to investigate physical-biological interactions in Icelandic waters. Satellite and in situ data were used to evaluate the model. Surface seasonal c...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2012-05-01
|
Series: | Geoscientific Model Development |
Online Access: | http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/5/683/2012/gmd-5-683-2012.pdf |
_version_ | 1818275038701289472 |
---|---|
author | S. R. Signorini S. Häkkinen K. Gudmundsson A. Olsen A. M. Omar J. Olafsson G. Reverdin S. A. Henson C. R. McClain D. L. Worthen |
author_facet | S. R. Signorini S. Häkkinen K. Gudmundsson A. Olsen A. M. Omar J. Olafsson G. Reverdin S. A. Henson C. R. McClain D. L. Worthen |
author_sort | S. R. Signorini |
collection | DOAJ |
description | We developed an ecosystem/biogeochemical model system, which includes multiple phytoplankton functional groups and carbon cycle dynamics, and applied it to investigate physical-biological interactions in Icelandic waters. Satellite and in situ data were used to evaluate the model. Surface seasonal cycle amplitudes and biases of key parameters (DIC, TA, <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>, air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux, and nutrients) are significantly improved when compared to surface observations by prescribing deep water values and trends, based on available data. The seasonality of the coccolithophore and "other phytoplankton" (diatoms and dinoflagellates) blooms is in general agreement with satellite ocean color products. Nutrient supply, biomass and calcite concentrations are modulated by light and mixed layer depth seasonal cycles. Diatoms are the most abundant phytoplankton, with a large bloom in early spring and a secondary bloom in fall. The diatom bloom is followed by blooms of dinoflagellates and coccolithophores. The effect of biological changes on the seasonal variability of the surface ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> is nearly twice the temperature effect, in agreement with previous studies. The inclusion of multiple phytoplankton functional groups in the model played a major role in the accurate representation of CO<sub>2</sub> uptake by biology. For instance, at the peak of the bloom, the exclusion of coccolithophores causes an increase in alkalinity of up to 4 μmol kg<sup>−1</sup> with a corresponding increase in DIC of up to 16 μmol kg<sup>−1</sup>. During the peak of the bloom in summer, the net effect of the absence of the coccolithophores bloom is an increase in <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> of more than 20 μatm and a reduction of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> uptake of more than 6 mmol m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>. On average, the impact of coccolithophores is an increase of air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux of about 27%. Considering the areal extent of the bloom from satellite images within the Irminger and Icelandic Basins, this reduction translates into an annual mean of nearly 1500 tonnes C yr<sup>−1</sup>. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T22:23:24Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d2bea61e23814a39a192c284612adad5 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1991-959X 1991-9603 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T22:23:24Z |
publishDate | 2012-05-01 |
publisher | Copernicus Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Geoscientific Model Development |
spelling | doaj.art-d2bea61e23814a39a192c284612adad52022-12-22T00:09:50ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032012-05-015368370710.5194/gmd-5-683-2012The role of phytoplankton dynamics in the seasonal and interannual variability of carbon in the subpolar North Atlantic – a modeling studyS. R. SignoriniS. HäkkinenK. GudmundssonA. OlsenA. M. OmarJ. OlafssonG. ReverdinS. A. HensonC. R. McClainD. L. WorthenWe developed an ecosystem/biogeochemical model system, which includes multiple phytoplankton functional groups and carbon cycle dynamics, and applied it to investigate physical-biological interactions in Icelandic waters. Satellite and in situ data were used to evaluate the model. Surface seasonal cycle amplitudes and biases of key parameters (DIC, TA, <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>, air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux, and nutrients) are significantly improved when compared to surface observations by prescribing deep water values and trends, based on available data. The seasonality of the coccolithophore and "other phytoplankton" (diatoms and dinoflagellates) blooms is in general agreement with satellite ocean color products. Nutrient supply, biomass and calcite concentrations are modulated by light and mixed layer depth seasonal cycles. Diatoms are the most abundant phytoplankton, with a large bloom in early spring and a secondary bloom in fall. The diatom bloom is followed by blooms of dinoflagellates and coccolithophores. The effect of biological changes on the seasonal variability of the surface ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> is nearly twice the temperature effect, in agreement with previous studies. The inclusion of multiple phytoplankton functional groups in the model played a major role in the accurate representation of CO<sub>2</sub> uptake by biology. For instance, at the peak of the bloom, the exclusion of coccolithophores causes an increase in alkalinity of up to 4 μmol kg<sup>−1</sup> with a corresponding increase in DIC of up to 16 μmol kg<sup>−1</sup>. During the peak of the bloom in summer, the net effect of the absence of the coccolithophores bloom is an increase in <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> of more than 20 μatm and a reduction of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> uptake of more than 6 mmol m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>. On average, the impact of coccolithophores is an increase of air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux of about 27%. Considering the areal extent of the bloom from satellite images within the Irminger and Icelandic Basins, this reduction translates into an annual mean of nearly 1500 tonnes C yr<sup>−1</sup>.http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/5/683/2012/gmd-5-683-2012.pdf |
spellingShingle | S. R. Signorini S. Häkkinen K. Gudmundsson A. Olsen A. M. Omar J. Olafsson G. Reverdin S. A. Henson C. R. McClain D. L. Worthen The role of phytoplankton dynamics in the seasonal and interannual variability of carbon in the subpolar North Atlantic – a modeling study Geoscientific Model Development |
title | The role of phytoplankton dynamics in the seasonal and interannual variability of carbon in the subpolar North Atlantic – a modeling study |
title_full | The role of phytoplankton dynamics in the seasonal and interannual variability of carbon in the subpolar North Atlantic – a modeling study |
title_fullStr | The role of phytoplankton dynamics in the seasonal and interannual variability of carbon in the subpolar North Atlantic – a modeling study |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of phytoplankton dynamics in the seasonal and interannual variability of carbon in the subpolar North Atlantic – a modeling study |
title_short | The role of phytoplankton dynamics in the seasonal and interannual variability of carbon in the subpolar North Atlantic – a modeling study |
title_sort | role of phytoplankton dynamics in the seasonal and interannual variability of carbon in the subpolar north atlantic a modeling study |
url | http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/5/683/2012/gmd-5-683-2012.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT srsignorini theroleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT shakkinen theroleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT kgudmundsson theroleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT aolsen theroleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT amomar theroleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT jolafsson theroleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT greverdin theroleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT sahenson theroleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT crmcclain theroleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT dlworthen theroleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT srsignorini roleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT shakkinen roleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT kgudmundsson roleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT aolsen roleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT amomar roleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT jolafsson roleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT greverdin roleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT sahenson roleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT crmcclain roleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy AT dlworthen roleofphytoplanktondynamicsintheseasonalandinterannualvariabilityofcarboninthesubpolarnorthatlanticamodelingstudy |