Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms

Abstract Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) is especially suitable for colorectal surgery. Until now, most of the reports published were about laparoscopic NOSES, the reports about robotic NOSES are extremely rare. This study aims to explore the safety and feasibility of robotic NOS...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hongliang Yao, Tiegang Li, Weidong Chen, Sanlin Lei, Kuijie Liu, Bo Liu, Jiangjiao Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2021-05-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89323-z
_version_ 1831834153760325632
author Hongliang Yao
Tiegang Li
Weidong Chen
Sanlin Lei
Kuijie Liu
Bo Liu
Jiangjiao Zhou
author_facet Hongliang Yao
Tiegang Li
Weidong Chen
Sanlin Lei
Kuijie Liu
Bo Liu
Jiangjiao Zhou
author_sort Hongliang Yao
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) is especially suitable for colorectal surgery. Until now, most of the reports published were about laparoscopic NOSES, the reports about robotic NOSES are extremely rare. This study aims to explore the safety and feasibility of robotic NOSES for colorectal neoplasms. All patients underwent robotic NOSES from March 2016 to October 2019 in our hospital were enrolled for retrospective analysis. Clinicopathological data including patient characteristics, perioperative information and pathological information were collected and analyzed. According to the distance between tumor and anus or whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nRCT) is performed, we grouped the cases and studied its influence on robotic NOSES. Also, we compared the previous reports on laparoscopic NOSES with our study and revealed advantages of robotic NOSES in terms of safety and feasibility. A total of 180 patients were enrolled. The average distance from the lower edge of the tumor to the anus was (8.64 ± 3.64) cm and maximum circumferential diameter (CDmax) of specimen was (3.5 ± 1.6) cm. In terms of safety, the average operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay were (187.5 ± 78.3) min, (47.4 ± 34) mL, and (11.3 ± 7.5) days, respectively. In terms of feasibility, the average number of lymph node harvested was (14.8 ± 5). Robotic NOSES shows advantages in terms of safety and feasibility compared with laparoscopic NOSES. This procedure could not only be a safe procedure but also could achieve good oncological outcomes.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T04:08:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d2cf6431651249bcb1409504f6285d20
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T04:08:36Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-d2cf6431651249bcb1409504f6285d202022-12-21T18:00:34ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222021-05-011111910.1038/s41598-021-89323-zRole of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasmsHongliang Yao0Tiegang Li1Weidong Chen2Sanlin Lei3Kuijie Liu4Bo Liu5Jiangjiao Zhou6Department of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityAbstract Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) is especially suitable for colorectal surgery. Until now, most of the reports published were about laparoscopic NOSES, the reports about robotic NOSES are extremely rare. This study aims to explore the safety and feasibility of robotic NOSES for colorectal neoplasms. All patients underwent robotic NOSES from March 2016 to October 2019 in our hospital were enrolled for retrospective analysis. Clinicopathological data including patient characteristics, perioperative information and pathological information were collected and analyzed. According to the distance between tumor and anus or whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nRCT) is performed, we grouped the cases and studied its influence on robotic NOSES. Also, we compared the previous reports on laparoscopic NOSES with our study and revealed advantages of robotic NOSES in terms of safety and feasibility. A total of 180 patients were enrolled. The average distance from the lower edge of the tumor to the anus was (8.64 ± 3.64) cm and maximum circumferential diameter (CDmax) of specimen was (3.5 ± 1.6) cm. In terms of safety, the average operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay were (187.5 ± 78.3) min, (47.4 ± 34) mL, and (11.3 ± 7.5) days, respectively. In terms of feasibility, the average number of lymph node harvested was (14.8 ± 5). Robotic NOSES shows advantages in terms of safety and feasibility compared with laparoscopic NOSES. This procedure could not only be a safe procedure but also could achieve good oncological outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89323-z
spellingShingle Hongliang Yao
Tiegang Li
Weidong Chen
Sanlin Lei
Kuijie Liu
Bo Liu
Jiangjiao Zhou
Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms
Scientific Reports
title Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms
title_full Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms
title_fullStr Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms
title_full_unstemmed Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms
title_short Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms
title_sort role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89323-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hongliangyao roleofroboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryincolorectalneoplasms
AT tiegangli roleofroboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryincolorectalneoplasms
AT weidongchen roleofroboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryincolorectalneoplasms
AT sanlinlei roleofroboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryincolorectalneoplasms
AT kuijieliu roleofroboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryincolorectalneoplasms
AT boliu roleofroboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryincolorectalneoplasms
AT jiangjiaozhou roleofroboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryincolorectalneoplasms