Engaging the Public to Identify Opportunities to Improve Critical Care: A Qualitative Analysis of an Open Community Forum.

To engage the public to understand how to improve the care of critically ill patients.A qualitative content analysis of an open community forum (Café Scientifique).Public venue in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.Members of the general public including patients, families of patients, health care providers,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melissa L Potestio, Jamie M Boyd, Sean M Bagshaw, Daren Heyland, Peter Oxland, Christopher J Doig, Dave Zygun, Henry T Stelfox
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4651489?pdf=render
_version_ 1828823492532895744
author Melissa L Potestio
Jamie M Boyd
Sean M Bagshaw
Daren Heyland
Peter Oxland
Christopher J Doig
Dave Zygun
Henry T Stelfox
author_facet Melissa L Potestio
Jamie M Boyd
Sean M Bagshaw
Daren Heyland
Peter Oxland
Christopher J Doig
Dave Zygun
Henry T Stelfox
author_sort Melissa L Potestio
collection DOAJ
description To engage the public to understand how to improve the care of critically ill patients.A qualitative content analysis of an open community forum (Café Scientifique).Public venue in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.Members of the general public including patients, families of patients, health care providers, and members of the community at large.A panel of researchers, decision-makers, and a family member led a Café Scientifique, an informal dialogue between the populace and experts, over three-hours to engage the public to understand how to improve the care of critically ill patients. Conventional qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the data. The inductive analysis occurred in three phases: coding, categorizing, and developing themes.Thirty-eight members of the public (former ICU patients, family members of patients, providers, community members) attended. Participants focused the discussion and provided concrete suggestions for improvement around communication (family as surrogate voice, timing of conversations, decision tools) and provider well-being and engagement, as opposed to medical interventions in critical care.Café participants believe patient and family centered care is important to ensure high-quality care in the ICU. A Café Scientifique is a valuable forum to engage the public to contribute to priority setting areas for research in critical care, as well as a platform to share lived experience. Research stakeholders including health care organizations, governments, and funding organizations should provide more opportunities for the public to engage in meaningful conversations about how to best improve healthcare.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T13:35:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d2d2a714d6d444a8a8dd039696a9b6e4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T13:35:44Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-d2d2a714d6d444a8a8dd039696a9b6e42022-12-22T00:22:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-011011e014308810.1371/journal.pone.0143088Engaging the Public to Identify Opportunities to Improve Critical Care: A Qualitative Analysis of an Open Community Forum.Melissa L PotestioJamie M BoydSean M BagshawDaren HeylandPeter OxlandChristopher J DoigDave ZygunHenry T StelfoxTo engage the public to understand how to improve the care of critically ill patients.A qualitative content analysis of an open community forum (Café Scientifique).Public venue in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.Members of the general public including patients, families of patients, health care providers, and members of the community at large.A panel of researchers, decision-makers, and a family member led a Café Scientifique, an informal dialogue between the populace and experts, over three-hours to engage the public to understand how to improve the care of critically ill patients. Conventional qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the data. The inductive analysis occurred in three phases: coding, categorizing, and developing themes.Thirty-eight members of the public (former ICU patients, family members of patients, providers, community members) attended. Participants focused the discussion and provided concrete suggestions for improvement around communication (family as surrogate voice, timing of conversations, decision tools) and provider well-being and engagement, as opposed to medical interventions in critical care.Café participants believe patient and family centered care is important to ensure high-quality care in the ICU. A Café Scientifique is a valuable forum to engage the public to contribute to priority setting areas for research in critical care, as well as a platform to share lived experience. Research stakeholders including health care organizations, governments, and funding organizations should provide more opportunities for the public to engage in meaningful conversations about how to best improve healthcare.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4651489?pdf=render
spellingShingle Melissa L Potestio
Jamie M Boyd
Sean M Bagshaw
Daren Heyland
Peter Oxland
Christopher J Doig
Dave Zygun
Henry T Stelfox
Engaging the Public to Identify Opportunities to Improve Critical Care: A Qualitative Analysis of an Open Community Forum.
PLoS ONE
title Engaging the Public to Identify Opportunities to Improve Critical Care: A Qualitative Analysis of an Open Community Forum.
title_full Engaging the Public to Identify Opportunities to Improve Critical Care: A Qualitative Analysis of an Open Community Forum.
title_fullStr Engaging the Public to Identify Opportunities to Improve Critical Care: A Qualitative Analysis of an Open Community Forum.
title_full_unstemmed Engaging the Public to Identify Opportunities to Improve Critical Care: A Qualitative Analysis of an Open Community Forum.
title_short Engaging the Public to Identify Opportunities to Improve Critical Care: A Qualitative Analysis of an Open Community Forum.
title_sort engaging the public to identify opportunities to improve critical care a qualitative analysis of an open community forum
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4651489?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT melissalpotestio engagingthepublictoidentifyopportunitiestoimprovecriticalcareaqualitativeanalysisofanopencommunityforum
AT jamiemboyd engagingthepublictoidentifyopportunitiestoimprovecriticalcareaqualitativeanalysisofanopencommunityforum
AT seanmbagshaw engagingthepublictoidentifyopportunitiestoimprovecriticalcareaqualitativeanalysisofanopencommunityforum
AT darenheyland engagingthepublictoidentifyopportunitiestoimprovecriticalcareaqualitativeanalysisofanopencommunityforum
AT peteroxland engagingthepublictoidentifyopportunitiestoimprovecriticalcareaqualitativeanalysisofanopencommunityforum
AT christopherjdoig engagingthepublictoidentifyopportunitiestoimprovecriticalcareaqualitativeanalysisofanopencommunityforum
AT davezygun engagingthepublictoidentifyopportunitiestoimprovecriticalcareaqualitativeanalysisofanopencommunityforum
AT henrytstelfox engagingthepublictoidentifyopportunitiestoimprovecriticalcareaqualitativeanalysisofanopencommunityforum