Genomic and prognostic heterogeneity among RAS/BRAFV600E/TP53 co‐mutated resectable colorectal liver metastases

Hepatic resection is potentially curative for patients with colorectal liver metastases, but the treatment benefit varies. KRAS/NRAS (RAS)/TP53 co‐mutations are associated with a poor prognosis after resection, but there is large variation in patient outcome within the mutation groups, and genetic t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaja C. G. Berg, Tuva H. Brunsell, Anita Sveen, Sharmini Alagaratnam, Merete Bjørnslett, Merete Hektoen, Kristoffer W. Brudvik, Bård I. Røsok, Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth, Arild Nesbakken, Ragnhild A. Lothe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-04-01
Series:Molecular Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12885
_version_ 1819076713074655232
author Kaja C. G. Berg
Tuva H. Brunsell
Anita Sveen
Sharmini Alagaratnam
Merete Bjørnslett
Merete Hektoen
Kristoffer W. Brudvik
Bård I. Røsok
Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth
Arild Nesbakken
Ragnhild A. Lothe
author_facet Kaja C. G. Berg
Tuva H. Brunsell
Anita Sveen
Sharmini Alagaratnam
Merete Bjørnslett
Merete Hektoen
Kristoffer W. Brudvik
Bård I. Røsok
Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth
Arild Nesbakken
Ragnhild A. Lothe
author_sort Kaja C. G. Berg
collection DOAJ
description Hepatic resection is potentially curative for patients with colorectal liver metastases, but the treatment benefit varies. KRAS/NRAS (RAS)/TP53 co‐mutations are associated with a poor prognosis after resection, but there is large variation in patient outcome within the mutation groups, and genetic testing is currently not used to evaluate benefit from surgery. We have investigated the potential for improved prognostic stratification by combined biomarker analysis with DNA copy number aberrations (CNAs), and taking tumor heterogeneity into account. We determined the mutation status of RAS, BRAFV600, and TP53 in 441 liver lesions from 171 patients treated by partial hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer. CNAs were profiled in 232 tumors from 67 of the patients. Mutations and high‐level amplifications of cancer‐critical genes, the latter including ERBB2 and EGFR, were predominantly homogeneous within patients. RAS/BRAFV600E and TP53 co‐mutations were associated with a poor patient outcome (hazard ratio, HR, 3.9, 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.3–11.1, P = 0.012) in multivariable analyses with clinicopathological variables. The genome‐wide CNA burden and intrapatient intermetastatic CNA heterogeneity varied within the mutation groups, and the CNA burden had prognostic associations in univariable analysis. Combined prognostic analyses of RAS/BRAFV600E/TP53 mutations and CNAs, either as a high CNA burden or high intermetastatic CNA heterogeneity, identified patients with a particularly poor outcome (co‐mutation/high CNA burden: HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2–5.9, P = 0.013; co‐mutation/high CNA heterogeneity: HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1–5.6, P = 0.022). In conclusion, DNA copy number profiling identified genomic and prognostic heterogeneity among patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases with co‐mutated RAS/BRAFV600E/TP53.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T18:45:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d2dbfb57bdf24a8294717b68cf6264b2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1574-7891
1878-0261
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T18:45:40Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Molecular Oncology
spelling doaj.art-d2dbfb57bdf24a8294717b68cf6264b22022-12-21T18:53:54ZengWileyMolecular Oncology1574-78911878-02612021-04-0115483084510.1002/1878-0261.12885Genomic and prognostic heterogeneity among RAS/BRAFV600E/TP53 co‐mutated resectable colorectal liver metastasesKaja C. G. Berg0Tuva H. Brunsell1Anita Sveen2Sharmini Alagaratnam3Merete Bjørnslett4Merete Hektoen5Kristoffer W. Brudvik6Bård I. Røsok7Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth8Arild Nesbakken9Ragnhild A. Lothe10Department of Molecular Oncology Institute for Cancer Research Oslo University Hospital NorwayDepartment of Molecular Oncology Institute for Cancer Research Oslo University Hospital NorwayDepartment of Molecular Oncology Institute for Cancer Research Oslo University Hospital NorwayDepartment of Molecular Oncology Institute for Cancer Research Oslo University Hospital NorwayDepartment of Molecular Oncology Institute for Cancer Research Oslo University Hospital NorwayDepartment of Molecular Oncology Institute for Cancer Research Oslo University Hospital NorwayK.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre Division for Cancer Medicine Oslo University Hospital NorwayK.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre Division for Cancer Medicine Oslo University Hospital NorwayK.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre Division for Cancer Medicine Oslo University Hospital NorwayK.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre Division for Cancer Medicine Oslo University Hospital NorwayDepartment of Molecular Oncology Institute for Cancer Research Oslo University Hospital NorwayHepatic resection is potentially curative for patients with colorectal liver metastases, but the treatment benefit varies. KRAS/NRAS (RAS)/TP53 co‐mutations are associated with a poor prognosis after resection, but there is large variation in patient outcome within the mutation groups, and genetic testing is currently not used to evaluate benefit from surgery. We have investigated the potential for improved prognostic stratification by combined biomarker analysis with DNA copy number aberrations (CNAs), and taking tumor heterogeneity into account. We determined the mutation status of RAS, BRAFV600, and TP53 in 441 liver lesions from 171 patients treated by partial hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer. CNAs were profiled in 232 tumors from 67 of the patients. Mutations and high‐level amplifications of cancer‐critical genes, the latter including ERBB2 and EGFR, were predominantly homogeneous within patients. RAS/BRAFV600E and TP53 co‐mutations were associated with a poor patient outcome (hazard ratio, HR, 3.9, 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.3–11.1, P = 0.012) in multivariable analyses with clinicopathological variables. The genome‐wide CNA burden and intrapatient intermetastatic CNA heterogeneity varied within the mutation groups, and the CNA burden had prognostic associations in univariable analysis. Combined prognostic analyses of RAS/BRAFV600E/TP53 mutations and CNAs, either as a high CNA burden or high intermetastatic CNA heterogeneity, identified patients with a particularly poor outcome (co‐mutation/high CNA burden: HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2–5.9, P = 0.013; co‐mutation/high CNA heterogeneity: HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1–5.6, P = 0.022). In conclusion, DNA copy number profiling identified genomic and prognostic heterogeneity among patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases with co‐mutated RAS/BRAFV600E/TP53.https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12885colorectal liver metastasesDNA copy number aberrationsgene mutationstumor heterogeneity
spellingShingle Kaja C. G. Berg
Tuva H. Brunsell
Anita Sveen
Sharmini Alagaratnam
Merete Bjørnslett
Merete Hektoen
Kristoffer W. Brudvik
Bård I. Røsok
Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth
Arild Nesbakken
Ragnhild A. Lothe
Genomic and prognostic heterogeneity among RAS/BRAFV600E/TP53 co‐mutated resectable colorectal liver metastases
Molecular Oncology
colorectal liver metastases
DNA copy number aberrations
gene mutations
tumor heterogeneity
title Genomic and prognostic heterogeneity among RAS/BRAFV600E/TP53 co‐mutated resectable colorectal liver metastases
title_full Genomic and prognostic heterogeneity among RAS/BRAFV600E/TP53 co‐mutated resectable colorectal liver metastases
title_fullStr Genomic and prognostic heterogeneity among RAS/BRAFV600E/TP53 co‐mutated resectable colorectal liver metastases
title_full_unstemmed Genomic and prognostic heterogeneity among RAS/BRAFV600E/TP53 co‐mutated resectable colorectal liver metastases
title_short Genomic and prognostic heterogeneity among RAS/BRAFV600E/TP53 co‐mutated resectable colorectal liver metastases
title_sort genomic and prognostic heterogeneity among ras brafv600e tp53 co mutated resectable colorectal liver metastases
topic colorectal liver metastases
DNA copy number aberrations
gene mutations
tumor heterogeneity
url https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12885
work_keys_str_mv AT kajacgberg genomicandprognosticheterogeneityamongrasbrafv600etp53comutatedresectablecolorectallivermetastases
AT tuvahbrunsell genomicandprognosticheterogeneityamongrasbrafv600etp53comutatedresectablecolorectallivermetastases
AT anitasveen genomicandprognosticheterogeneityamongrasbrafv600etp53comutatedresectablecolorectallivermetastases
AT sharminialagaratnam genomicandprognosticheterogeneityamongrasbrafv600etp53comutatedresectablecolorectallivermetastases
AT meretebjørnslett genomicandprognosticheterogeneityamongrasbrafv600etp53comutatedresectablecolorectallivermetastases
AT meretehektoen genomicandprognosticheterogeneityamongrasbrafv600etp53comutatedresectablecolorectallivermetastases
AT kristofferwbrudvik genomicandprognosticheterogeneityamongrasbrafv600etp53comutatedresectablecolorectallivermetastases
AT bardirøsok genomicandprognosticheterogeneityamongrasbrafv600etp53comutatedresectablecolorectallivermetastases
AT bjørnatlebjørnbeth genomicandprognosticheterogeneityamongrasbrafv600etp53comutatedresectablecolorectallivermetastases
AT arildnesbakken genomicandprognosticheterogeneityamongrasbrafv600etp53comutatedresectablecolorectallivermetastases
AT ragnhildalothe genomicandprognosticheterogeneityamongrasbrafv600etp53comutatedresectablecolorectallivermetastases