A novel training program: laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer can be trained simultaneously

BackgroundCurrent expectations are that surgeons should be technically proficient in minimally invasive low anterior resection (LAR)—both laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery. However, methods to effectively train surgeons for both approaches are under-explored. We aimed to compare two differen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yanlei Wang, Dongpeng Wen, Cheng Zhang, Zhikai Wang, Jiancheng Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1169932/full
_version_ 1797794318613741568
author Yanlei Wang
Dongpeng Wen
Cheng Zhang
Zhikai Wang
Jiancheng Zhang
author_facet Yanlei Wang
Dongpeng Wen
Cheng Zhang
Zhikai Wang
Jiancheng Zhang
author_sort Yanlei Wang
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundCurrent expectations are that surgeons should be technically proficient in minimally invasive low anterior resection (LAR)—both laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery. However, methods to effectively train surgeons for both approaches are under-explored. We aimed to compare two different training programs for minimally invasive LAR, focusing on the learning curve and perioperative outcomes of two trainee surgeons.MethodsWe reviewed 272 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic LAR by surgeons A and B, who were novices in conducting minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Surgeon A was trained by first operating on 80 cases by laparoscopy and then 56 cases by robotic-assisted surgery. Surgeon B was trained by simultaneously performing 80 cases by laparoscopy and 56 by robotic-assisted surgery. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) method was used to evaluate the learning curves of operative time and surgical failure.ResultsFor laparoscopic surgery, the CUSUM plots showed a longer learning process for surgeon A than surgeon B (47 vs. 32 cases) for operative time, but a similar trend in surgical failure (23 vs. 19 cases). For robotic surgery, the plots of the two surgeons showed similar trends for both operative times (23 vs. 25 cases) and surgical failure (17 vs. 19 cases). Therefore, the learning curves of surgeons A and B were respectively divided into two phases at the 47th and 32nd cases for laparoscopic surgery and at the 23rd and 25th cases for robotic surgery. The clinicopathological outcomes of the two surgeons were similar in each phase of the learning curve for each surgery.ConclusionsFor surgeons with rich experience in open colorectal resections, simultaneous training for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted LAR of rectal cancer is safe, effective, and associated with accelerated learning curves.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T03:00:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d2e38735d32c40c297ac3c82c4ae1220
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T03:00:59Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-d2e38735d32c40c297ac3c82c4ae12202023-06-27T14:43:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2023-06-011310.3389/fonc.2023.11699321169932A novel training program: laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer can be trained simultaneouslyYanlei WangDongpeng WenCheng ZhangZhikai WangJiancheng ZhangBackgroundCurrent expectations are that surgeons should be technically proficient in minimally invasive low anterior resection (LAR)—both laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery. However, methods to effectively train surgeons for both approaches are under-explored. We aimed to compare two different training programs for minimally invasive LAR, focusing on the learning curve and perioperative outcomes of two trainee surgeons.MethodsWe reviewed 272 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic LAR by surgeons A and B, who were novices in conducting minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Surgeon A was trained by first operating on 80 cases by laparoscopy and then 56 cases by robotic-assisted surgery. Surgeon B was trained by simultaneously performing 80 cases by laparoscopy and 56 by robotic-assisted surgery. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) method was used to evaluate the learning curves of operative time and surgical failure.ResultsFor laparoscopic surgery, the CUSUM plots showed a longer learning process for surgeon A than surgeon B (47 vs. 32 cases) for operative time, but a similar trend in surgical failure (23 vs. 19 cases). For robotic surgery, the plots of the two surgeons showed similar trends for both operative times (23 vs. 25 cases) and surgical failure (17 vs. 19 cases). Therefore, the learning curves of surgeons A and B were respectively divided into two phases at the 47th and 32nd cases for laparoscopic surgery and at the 23rd and 25th cases for robotic surgery. The clinicopathological outcomes of the two surgeons were similar in each phase of the learning curve for each surgery.ConclusionsFor surgeons with rich experience in open colorectal resections, simultaneous training for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted LAR of rectal cancer is safe, effective, and associated with accelerated learning curves.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1169932/fullroboticda Vincilearning curvelaparoscopiclow anterior resection
spellingShingle Yanlei Wang
Dongpeng Wen
Cheng Zhang
Zhikai Wang
Jiancheng Zhang
A novel training program: laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer can be trained simultaneously
Frontiers in Oncology
robotic
da Vinci
learning curve
laparoscopic
low anterior resection
title A novel training program: laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer can be trained simultaneously
title_full A novel training program: laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer can be trained simultaneously
title_fullStr A novel training program: laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer can be trained simultaneously
title_full_unstemmed A novel training program: laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer can be trained simultaneously
title_short A novel training program: laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer can be trained simultaneously
title_sort novel training program laparoscopic versus robotic assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer can be trained simultaneously
topic robotic
da Vinci
learning curve
laparoscopic
low anterior resection
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1169932/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yanleiwang anoveltrainingprogramlaparoscopicversusroboticassistedlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancercanbetrainedsimultaneously
AT dongpengwen anoveltrainingprogramlaparoscopicversusroboticassistedlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancercanbetrainedsimultaneously
AT chengzhang anoveltrainingprogramlaparoscopicversusroboticassistedlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancercanbetrainedsimultaneously
AT zhikaiwang anoveltrainingprogramlaparoscopicversusroboticassistedlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancercanbetrainedsimultaneously
AT jianchengzhang anoveltrainingprogramlaparoscopicversusroboticassistedlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancercanbetrainedsimultaneously
AT yanleiwang noveltrainingprogramlaparoscopicversusroboticassistedlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancercanbetrainedsimultaneously
AT dongpengwen noveltrainingprogramlaparoscopicversusroboticassistedlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancercanbetrainedsimultaneously
AT chengzhang noveltrainingprogramlaparoscopicversusroboticassistedlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancercanbetrainedsimultaneously
AT zhikaiwang noveltrainingprogramlaparoscopicversusroboticassistedlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancercanbetrainedsimultaneously
AT jianchengzhang noveltrainingprogramlaparoscopicversusroboticassistedlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancercanbetrainedsimultaneously