Patient preferences in genetic newborn screening for rare diseases: study protocol

Introduction Rare diseases (RDs) collectively impact over 30 million people in Europe. Most individual conditions have a low prevalence which has resulted in a lack of research and expertise in this field, especially regarding genetic newborn screening (gNBS). There is increasing recognition of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonio Novelli, Alessandra Ferlini, Ferdinand Knieling, Brett Hauber, Jorien Veldwijk, Mats Hansson, Janbernd Kirschner, Åsa Grauman, Sylvia MARTIN, Emanuele Angolini, Jennifer Audi, Dr. Enrico Bertini, Lucia Pia Bruno, Joshua Coulter, Fernanda Fortunato, Vera Frankova, Nicolas Garnier, Edith Gross, Gergana Kyosovksa, Silvia Ottombrino, Roman Raming, Stefaan Sansen, Christina Saier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2024-04-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/4/e081835.full
_version_ 1827260059791392768
author Antonio Novelli
Alessandra Ferlini
Ferdinand Knieling
Brett Hauber
Jorien Veldwijk
Mats Hansson
Janbernd Kirschner
Åsa Grauman
Sylvia MARTIN
Emanuele Angolini
Jennifer Audi
Dr. Enrico Bertini
Lucia Pia Bruno
Joshua Coulter
Fernanda Fortunato
Vera Frankova
Nicolas Garnier
Edith Gross
Gergana Kyosovksa
Silvia Ottombrino
Roman Raming
Stefaan Sansen
Christina Saier
author_facet Antonio Novelli
Alessandra Ferlini
Ferdinand Knieling
Brett Hauber
Jorien Veldwijk
Mats Hansson
Janbernd Kirschner
Åsa Grauman
Sylvia MARTIN
Emanuele Angolini
Jennifer Audi
Dr. Enrico Bertini
Lucia Pia Bruno
Joshua Coulter
Fernanda Fortunato
Vera Frankova
Nicolas Garnier
Edith Gross
Gergana Kyosovksa
Silvia Ottombrino
Roman Raming
Stefaan Sansen
Christina Saier
author_sort Antonio Novelli
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Rare diseases (RDs) collectively impact over 30 million people in Europe. Most individual conditions have a low prevalence which has resulted in a lack of research and expertise in this field, especially regarding genetic newborn screening (gNBS). There is increasing recognition of the importance of incorporating patients’ needs and general public perspectives into the shared decision-making process regarding gNBS. This study is part of the Innovative Medicine Initiative project Screen4Care which aims at shortening the diagnostic journey for RDs by accelerating diagnosis for patients living with RDs through gNBS and the use of digital technologies, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning. Our objective will be to assess expecting parent’s perspectives, attitudes and preferences regarding gNBS for RDs in Italy and Germany.Methods and analysis A mixed method approach will assess perspectives, attitudes and preferences of (1) expecting parents seeking genetic consultation and (2) ‘healthy’ expecting parents from the general population in two countries (Germany and Italy). Focus groups and interviews using the nominal group technique and ranking exercises will be performed (qualitative phase). The results will inform the treatment of attributes to be assessed via a survey and a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The total recruitment sample will be 2084 participants (approximatively 1000 participants in each country for the online survey). A combination of thematic qualitative and logit-based quantitative approaches will be used to analyse the results of the study.Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by the Erlangen University Ethics Committee (22–246_1-B), the Freiburg University Ethics Committee (23–1005 S1-AV) and clinical centres in Italy (University of FerraraCE: 357/2023/Oss/AOUFe and Hospedale Bambino Gesu: No.2997 of 2 November 2023, Prot. No. _902) and approved for data storage and handling at the Uppsala University (2022-05806-01). The dissemination of the results will be ensured via scientific journal publication (open access).
first_indexed 2024-04-24T07:34:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d2f7ca79e557453aa7cd102867751306
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2044-6055
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-22T02:36:28Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj.art-d2f7ca79e557453aa7cd1028677513062024-05-03T18:10:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552024-04-0114410.1136/bmjopen-2023-081835Patient preferences in genetic newborn screening for rare diseases: study protocolAntonio Novelli0Alessandra Ferlini1Ferdinand Knieling2Brett Hauber3Jorien Veldwijk4Mats Hansson5Janbernd Kirschner6Åsa Grauman7Sylvia MARTIN8Emanuele Angolini9Jennifer Audi10Dr. Enrico Bertini11Lucia Pia Bruno12Joshua Coulter13Fernanda Fortunato14Vera Frankova15Nicolas Garnier16Edith Gross17Gergana Kyosovksa18Silvia Ottombrino19Roman Raming20Stefaan Sansen21Christina Saier222 Research Unit of Neuromuscular and Neurodegenerative Disease, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy7 Medical Genetics Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy11 Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany6 Pfizer Inc, New York, New York, USAErasmus Universiteit Rotterdam Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands1 Center for Research and Bioethics, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden10 Department of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany1 Center for Research and Bioethics, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden1 Center for Research and Bioethics, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden2 Research Unit of Neuromuscular and Neurodegenerative Disease, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy3 Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Opfikon, Zürich, Switzerland2 Research Unit of Neuromuscular and Neurodegenerative Disease, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy4 Medical Genetics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy6 Pfizer Inc, New York, New York, USA7 Medical Genetics Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy8 Institute for Medical Humanities, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic6 Pfizer Inc, New York, New York, USA9 EURORDIS, Paris, Ile-de-France, France12 Bulgarian Association for Personalised Medicine, Sofia, Bulgaria2 Research Unit of Neuromuscular and Neurodegenerative Disease, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy11 Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany13 Sanofi-Aventis SA, Diegem, Belgium14 Department of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, GermanyIntroduction Rare diseases (RDs) collectively impact over 30 million people in Europe. Most individual conditions have a low prevalence which has resulted in a lack of research and expertise in this field, especially regarding genetic newborn screening (gNBS). There is increasing recognition of the importance of incorporating patients’ needs and general public perspectives into the shared decision-making process regarding gNBS. This study is part of the Innovative Medicine Initiative project Screen4Care which aims at shortening the diagnostic journey for RDs by accelerating diagnosis for patients living with RDs through gNBS and the use of digital technologies, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning. Our objective will be to assess expecting parent’s perspectives, attitudes and preferences regarding gNBS for RDs in Italy and Germany.Methods and analysis A mixed method approach will assess perspectives, attitudes and preferences of (1) expecting parents seeking genetic consultation and (2) ‘healthy’ expecting parents from the general population in two countries (Germany and Italy). Focus groups and interviews using the nominal group technique and ranking exercises will be performed (qualitative phase). The results will inform the treatment of attributes to be assessed via a survey and a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The total recruitment sample will be 2084 participants (approximatively 1000 participants in each country for the online survey). A combination of thematic qualitative and logit-based quantitative approaches will be used to analyse the results of the study.Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by the Erlangen University Ethics Committee (22–246_1-B), the Freiburg University Ethics Committee (23–1005 S1-AV) and clinical centres in Italy (University of FerraraCE: 357/2023/Oss/AOUFe and Hospedale Bambino Gesu: No.2997 of 2 November 2023, Prot. No. _902) and approved for data storage and handling at the Uppsala University (2022-05806-01). The dissemination of the results will be ensured via scientific journal publication (open access).https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/4/e081835.full
spellingShingle Antonio Novelli
Alessandra Ferlini
Ferdinand Knieling
Brett Hauber
Jorien Veldwijk
Mats Hansson
Janbernd Kirschner
Åsa Grauman
Sylvia MARTIN
Emanuele Angolini
Jennifer Audi
Dr. Enrico Bertini
Lucia Pia Bruno
Joshua Coulter
Fernanda Fortunato
Vera Frankova
Nicolas Garnier
Edith Gross
Gergana Kyosovksa
Silvia Ottombrino
Roman Raming
Stefaan Sansen
Christina Saier
Patient preferences in genetic newborn screening for rare diseases: study protocol
BMJ Open
title Patient preferences in genetic newborn screening for rare diseases: study protocol
title_full Patient preferences in genetic newborn screening for rare diseases: study protocol
title_fullStr Patient preferences in genetic newborn screening for rare diseases: study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Patient preferences in genetic newborn screening for rare diseases: study protocol
title_short Patient preferences in genetic newborn screening for rare diseases: study protocol
title_sort patient preferences in genetic newborn screening for rare diseases study protocol
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/4/e081835.full
work_keys_str_mv AT antonionovelli patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT alessandraferlini patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT ferdinandknieling patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT bretthauber patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT jorienveldwijk patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT matshansson patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT janberndkirschner patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT asagrauman patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT sylviamartin patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT emanueleangolini patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT jenniferaudi patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT drenricobertini patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT luciapiabruno patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT joshuacoulter patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT fernandafortunato patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT verafrankova patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT nicolasgarnier patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT edithgross patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT gerganakyosovksa patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT silviaottombrino patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT romanraming patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT stefaansansen patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol
AT christinasaier patientpreferencesingeneticnewbornscreeningforrarediseasesstudyprotocol