Benchmarking Hamiltonian Noise in the D-Wave Quantum Annealer

Various sources of noise limit the performance of quantum computers by altering qubit states in an uncontrolled manner throughout computations and reducing their coherence time. In quantum annealers, this noise introduces additional fluctuations to the parameters defining the original problem Hamilt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tristan Zaborniak, Rogerio de Sousa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2021-01-01
Series:IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9319535/
Description
Summary:Various sources of noise limit the performance of quantum computers by altering qubit states in an uncontrolled manner throughout computations and reducing their coherence time. In quantum annealers, this noise introduces additional fluctuations to the parameters defining the original problem Hamiltonian, such that they find the ground states of problems perturbed from those originally programmed. Here, we describe a method to benchmark the amount of noise affecting the programmed Hamiltonian of a quantum annealer. We show that a sequence of degenerate runs with the coefficients of the programmed Hamiltonian set to zero leads to an estimate of the noise spectral density affecting Hamiltonian parameters <italic>&#x201C;in situ&#x201D;</italic> during the quantum annealing protocol. The method is demonstrated in D-Wave&#x0027;s lower noise 2000 qubit device (<monospace>DW_2000Q_6</monospace>) and in its recently released 5000 qubit device (<monospace>Advantage_system1.1</monospace>). Our benchmarking of <monospace>DW_2000Q_6</monospace> shows Hamiltonian noise dominated by the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$1/f^{0.7}$</tex-math></inline-formula> frequency dependence characteristic of flux noise <italic>intrinsic to the materials</italic> forming flux qubits. In contrast, <monospace>Advantage_system1.1</monospace> is found to be affected by additional noise sources for low annealing times, with underlying intrinsic flux noise amplitudes <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2\!-\!3$</tex-math></inline-formula> times higher than in <monospace>DW_2000Q_6</monospace> for all annealing times.
ISSN:2689-1808