Biomechanical study of different fixation constructs for anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse acetabular fractures: a finite element analysis

Abstract Background To compare the biomechanical properties and stability, using a finite element model, of four fixation constructs used for the treatment of anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse (ACPHT) acetabular fractures under two physiological loading conditions (standing and sitting)....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaifang Chen, Guixiong Huang, Yizhou Wan, Sheng Yao, Yanlin Su, Lianxin Li, Xiaodong Guo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-04-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03715-7
_version_ 1797845905523605504
author Kaifang Chen
Guixiong Huang
Yizhou Wan
Sheng Yao
Yanlin Su
Lianxin Li
Xiaodong Guo
author_facet Kaifang Chen
Guixiong Huang
Yizhou Wan
Sheng Yao
Yanlin Su
Lianxin Li
Xiaodong Guo
author_sort Kaifang Chen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background To compare the biomechanical properties and stability, using a finite element model, of four fixation constructs used for the treatment of anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse (ACPHT) acetabular fractures under two physiological loading conditions (standing and sitting). Methods A finite element model simulating ACPHT acetabular fractures was created for four different scenarios: a suprapectineal plate combined with posterior column and infra-acetabular screws (SP-PS-IS); an infrapectineal plate combined with posterior column and infra-acetabular screws (IP-PS-IS); a special infrapectineal quadrilateral surface buttress plate (IQP); and a suprapectineal plate combined with a posterior column plate (SP-PP). Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis was performed on these models with a load of 700 N in standing and sitting positions. Biomechanical stress distributions and fracture displacements were analysed and compared between these fixation techniques. Results In models simulating the standing position, high displacements and stress distributions were observed at the infra-acetabulum regions. The degree of these fracture displacements was low in the IQP (0.078 mm), as compared to either the IP-PS-IS (0.079 mm) or the SP & PP (0.413 mm) fixation constructs. However, the IP-PS-IS fixation construct had the highest effective stiffness. In models simulating the sitting position, high fracture displacements and stress distributions were observed at the regions of the anterior and posterior columns. The degree of these fracture displacements was low in the SP-PS-IS (0.101 mm), as compared to the IP-PS-IS (0.109 mm) and the SP-PP (0.196 mm) fixation constructs. Conclusion In both standing and sitting positions, the stability and stiffness index were comparable between the IQP, SP-PS-IS, and IP-PS-IS. These 3 fixation constructs had smaller fracture displacements than the SP-PP construct. The stress concentrations at the regions of quadrilateral surface and infra-acetabulum suggest that the buttressing fixation of quadrilateral plate was required for ACPHT fractures.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:46:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d30355b505e44817876782790e68fb7a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-799X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:46:30Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj.art-d30355b505e44817876782790e68fb7a2023-04-16T11:20:09ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2023-04-0118111110.1186/s13018-023-03715-7Biomechanical study of different fixation constructs for anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse acetabular fractures: a finite element analysisKaifang Chen0Guixiong Huang1Yizhou Wan2Sheng Yao3Yanlin Su4Lianxin Li5Xiaodong Guo6Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong UniversityDepartment of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyAbstract Background To compare the biomechanical properties and stability, using a finite element model, of four fixation constructs used for the treatment of anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse (ACPHT) acetabular fractures under two physiological loading conditions (standing and sitting). Methods A finite element model simulating ACPHT acetabular fractures was created for four different scenarios: a suprapectineal plate combined with posterior column and infra-acetabular screws (SP-PS-IS); an infrapectineal plate combined with posterior column and infra-acetabular screws (IP-PS-IS); a special infrapectineal quadrilateral surface buttress plate (IQP); and a suprapectineal plate combined with a posterior column plate (SP-PP). Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis was performed on these models with a load of 700 N in standing and sitting positions. Biomechanical stress distributions and fracture displacements were analysed and compared between these fixation techniques. Results In models simulating the standing position, high displacements and stress distributions were observed at the infra-acetabulum regions. The degree of these fracture displacements was low in the IQP (0.078 mm), as compared to either the IP-PS-IS (0.079 mm) or the SP & PP (0.413 mm) fixation constructs. However, the IP-PS-IS fixation construct had the highest effective stiffness. In models simulating the sitting position, high fracture displacements and stress distributions were observed at the regions of the anterior and posterior columns. The degree of these fracture displacements was low in the SP-PS-IS (0.101 mm), as compared to the IP-PS-IS (0.109 mm) and the SP-PP (0.196 mm) fixation constructs. Conclusion In both standing and sitting positions, the stability and stiffness index were comparable between the IQP, SP-PS-IS, and IP-PS-IS. These 3 fixation constructs had smaller fracture displacements than the SP-PP construct. The stress concentrations at the regions of quadrilateral surface and infra-acetabulum suggest that the buttressing fixation of quadrilateral plate was required for ACPHT fractures.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03715-7Acetabular fracturesFinite elementBiomechanicsQuadrilateral surfaceInfrapectineal plate
spellingShingle Kaifang Chen
Guixiong Huang
Yizhou Wan
Sheng Yao
Yanlin Su
Lianxin Li
Xiaodong Guo
Biomechanical study of different fixation constructs for anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse acetabular fractures: a finite element analysis
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Acetabular fractures
Finite element
Biomechanics
Quadrilateral surface
Infrapectineal plate
title Biomechanical study of different fixation constructs for anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse acetabular fractures: a finite element analysis
title_full Biomechanical study of different fixation constructs for anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse acetabular fractures: a finite element analysis
title_fullStr Biomechanical study of different fixation constructs for anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse acetabular fractures: a finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical study of different fixation constructs for anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse acetabular fractures: a finite element analysis
title_short Biomechanical study of different fixation constructs for anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse acetabular fractures: a finite element analysis
title_sort biomechanical study of different fixation constructs for anterior column and posterior hemi transverse acetabular fractures a finite element analysis
topic Acetabular fractures
Finite element
Biomechanics
Quadrilateral surface
Infrapectineal plate
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03715-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kaifangchen biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfixationconstructsforanteriorcolumnandposteriorhemitransverseacetabularfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT guixionghuang biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfixationconstructsforanteriorcolumnandposteriorhemitransverseacetabularfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT yizhouwan biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfixationconstructsforanteriorcolumnandposteriorhemitransverseacetabularfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT shengyao biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfixationconstructsforanteriorcolumnandposteriorhemitransverseacetabularfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT yanlinsu biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfixationconstructsforanteriorcolumnandposteriorhemitransverseacetabularfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT lianxinli biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfixationconstructsforanteriorcolumnandposteriorhemitransverseacetabularfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT xiaodongguo biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfixationconstructsforanteriorcolumnandposteriorhemitransverseacetabularfracturesafiniteelementanalysis