Does the use of biological traits predict a smooth landscape of ecosystem functioning?

Abstract The biodiversity crisis has increased interest in understanding the role of biodiversity for ecosystem functioning. Functional traits are often used to infer ecosystem functions to increase our understanding of these relationships over larger spatial scales. The links between specific trait...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johanna Gammal, Judi Hewitt, Joanna Norkko, Alf Norkko, Simon Thrush
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-10-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6696
_version_ 1818725797872009216
author Johanna Gammal
Judi Hewitt
Joanna Norkko
Alf Norkko
Simon Thrush
author_facet Johanna Gammal
Judi Hewitt
Joanna Norkko
Alf Norkko
Simon Thrush
author_sort Johanna Gammal
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The biodiversity crisis has increased interest in understanding the role of biodiversity for ecosystem functioning. Functional traits are often used to infer ecosystem functions to increase our understanding of these relationships over larger spatial scales. The links between specific traits and ecosystem functioning are, however, not always well established. We investigated how the choice of analyzing either individual species, selected modalities, or trait combinations affected the spatial patterns observed on a sandflat and how this was related to the natural variability in ecosystem functioning. A large dataset of 400 benthic macrofauna samples was used to explore distribution patterns. We hypothesized that (1) if multiple species (redundancy) represent a trait combination or a modality their spatial patterns would be smoothed out, and (2) the lost spatial variability within a trait combination or modality, due to the smoothing effect, would potentially affect their utility for predicting ecosystem functioning (tested on a dataset of 24 samples). We predicted that species would show heterogeneous small spatial patterns, while modalities and trait combinations would show larger and more homogeneous patterns because they would represent a collection of many distributions. If modalities and trait combinations are better predictors of ecosystem functioning than species, then the smoother spatial patterns of modalities and trait combinations would result in a more homogeneous landscape of ecosystem function and the number of species exhibiting specific traits would provide functional redundancy. Our results showed some smoothing of spatial patterns progressing from species through modalities to trait combinations, but generally spatial patterns reflected a few dominant key species. Moreover, some individual modalities and species explained more or equal proportions of the variance in the ecosystem functioning than the combined traits. The findings thus suggest that only some spatial variability is lost when species are combined into modalities and trait combinations and that a homogeneous landscape of ecosystem function is not likely.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T21:48:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d3072355bfdf488fa36bb8c1f4239193
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7758
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T21:48:01Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-d3072355bfdf488fa36bb8c1f42391932022-12-21T21:31:24ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582020-10-011019103951040710.1002/ece3.6696Does the use of biological traits predict a smooth landscape of ecosystem functioning?Johanna Gammal0Judi Hewitt1Joanna Norkko2Alf Norkko3Simon Thrush4Tvärminne Zoological Station University of Helsinki Hangö FinlandNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Hamilton New ZealandTvärminne Zoological Station University of Helsinki Hangö FinlandTvärminne Zoological Station University of Helsinki Hangö FinlandInstitute of Marine Science University of Auckland Auckland New ZealandAbstract The biodiversity crisis has increased interest in understanding the role of biodiversity for ecosystem functioning. Functional traits are often used to infer ecosystem functions to increase our understanding of these relationships over larger spatial scales. The links between specific traits and ecosystem functioning are, however, not always well established. We investigated how the choice of analyzing either individual species, selected modalities, or trait combinations affected the spatial patterns observed on a sandflat and how this was related to the natural variability in ecosystem functioning. A large dataset of 400 benthic macrofauna samples was used to explore distribution patterns. We hypothesized that (1) if multiple species (redundancy) represent a trait combination or a modality their spatial patterns would be smoothed out, and (2) the lost spatial variability within a trait combination or modality, due to the smoothing effect, would potentially affect their utility for predicting ecosystem functioning (tested on a dataset of 24 samples). We predicted that species would show heterogeneous small spatial patterns, while modalities and trait combinations would show larger and more homogeneous patterns because they would represent a collection of many distributions. If modalities and trait combinations are better predictors of ecosystem functioning than species, then the smoother spatial patterns of modalities and trait combinations would result in a more homogeneous landscape of ecosystem function and the number of species exhibiting specific traits would provide functional redundancy. Our results showed some smoothing of spatial patterns progressing from species through modalities to trait combinations, but generally spatial patterns reflected a few dominant key species. Moreover, some individual modalities and species explained more or equal proportions of the variance in the ecosystem functioning than the combined traits. The findings thus suggest that only some spatial variability is lost when species are combined into modalities and trait combinations and that a homogeneous landscape of ecosystem function is not likely.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6696benthic macrofaunabiodiversity–ecosystem functioningfunctional traitskey speciesredundancyspatial patterns
spellingShingle Johanna Gammal
Judi Hewitt
Joanna Norkko
Alf Norkko
Simon Thrush
Does the use of biological traits predict a smooth landscape of ecosystem functioning?
Ecology and Evolution
benthic macrofauna
biodiversity–ecosystem functioning
functional traits
key species
redundancy
spatial patterns
title Does the use of biological traits predict a smooth landscape of ecosystem functioning?
title_full Does the use of biological traits predict a smooth landscape of ecosystem functioning?
title_fullStr Does the use of biological traits predict a smooth landscape of ecosystem functioning?
title_full_unstemmed Does the use of biological traits predict a smooth landscape of ecosystem functioning?
title_short Does the use of biological traits predict a smooth landscape of ecosystem functioning?
title_sort does the use of biological traits predict a smooth landscape of ecosystem functioning
topic benthic macrofauna
biodiversity–ecosystem functioning
functional traits
key species
redundancy
spatial patterns
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6696
work_keys_str_mv AT johannagammal doestheuseofbiologicaltraitspredictasmoothlandscapeofecosystemfunctioning
AT judihewitt doestheuseofbiologicaltraitspredictasmoothlandscapeofecosystemfunctioning
AT joannanorkko doestheuseofbiologicaltraitspredictasmoothlandscapeofecosystemfunctioning
AT alfnorkko doestheuseofbiologicaltraitspredictasmoothlandscapeofecosystemfunctioning
AT simonthrush doestheuseofbiologicaltraitspredictasmoothlandscapeofecosystemfunctioning