What should be done in patients diagnosed with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis? Case-control study

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to compare development of complications, malignancy and confusion rates in the preliminary diagnosis in patients with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis identified. METHODS: In this study, 2803 patients undergone cholecystectomy between January 2010 and December 201...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tolga Canbak, Aylin Acar, Hüseyin Kerem Tolan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KARE Publishing 2020-10-01
Series:İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=nci&un=NCI-35848
_version_ 1797906982417465344
author Tolga Canbak
Aylin Acar
Hüseyin Kerem Tolan
author_facet Tolga Canbak
Aylin Acar
Hüseyin Kerem Tolan
author_sort Tolga Canbak
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to compare development of complications, malignancy and confusion rates in the preliminary diagnosis in patients with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis identified. METHODS: In this study, 2803 patients undergone cholecystectomy between January 2010 and December 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis identified in the histopathological examination were classified as Group 1 and patients with cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, and malignancy detected were classified as Group 2. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis were classified as group 1 and 2758 patients as group 2. of group 1, 18 were male and group 2 consisted of 2758 patients with 707 (26%) being male (p=0.04). In the ultrasonographic examination, the wall thickness was increased in 40 patients in Group 1 and 662 patients in Group 2 (p<0.0001). The operation was converted to the open type in 24 patients in Group 1 and 61 patients in Group 2 (p<0.0001). Five patients in Group 1 and 32 patients in Group 2 developed complications in the postoperative period (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis should be considered for the differential diagnosis and the operation should be performed, especially by carefully exposing the anatomy in these patients.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T10:29:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d317f8fb2f714dda9c4adcf297feeca6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2148-4902
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T10:29:15Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher KARE Publishing
record_format Article
series İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri
spelling doaj.art-d317f8fb2f714dda9c4adcf297feeca62023-02-15T16:21:12ZengKARE Publishingİstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri2148-49022020-10-017546747010.14744/nci.2020.35848NCI-35848What should be done in patients diagnosed with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis? Case-control studyTolga Canbak0Aylin Acar1Hüseyin Kerem Tolan2Department of General Surgery, Health Sciences University, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TurkeyDepartment of General Surgery, Health Sciences University, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TurkeyDepartment of General Surgery, Health Sciences University, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TurkeyOBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to compare development of complications, malignancy and confusion rates in the preliminary diagnosis in patients with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis identified. METHODS: In this study, 2803 patients undergone cholecystectomy between January 2010 and December 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis identified in the histopathological examination were classified as Group 1 and patients with cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, and malignancy detected were classified as Group 2. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis were classified as group 1 and 2758 patients as group 2. of group 1, 18 were male and group 2 consisted of 2758 patients with 707 (26%) being male (p=0.04). In the ultrasonographic examination, the wall thickness was increased in 40 patients in Group 1 and 662 patients in Group 2 (p<0.0001). The operation was converted to the open type in 24 patients in Group 1 and 61 patients in Group 2 (p<0.0001). Five patients in Group 1 and 32 patients in Group 2 developed complications in the postoperative period (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis should be considered for the differential diagnosis and the operation should be performed, especially by carefully exposing the anatomy in these patients.https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=nci&un=NCI-35848cholecystitischolecystectomy; xanthogranulomatous.
spellingShingle Tolga Canbak
Aylin Acar
Hüseyin Kerem Tolan
What should be done in patients diagnosed with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis? Case-control study
İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri
cholecystitis
cholecystectomy; xanthogranulomatous.
title What should be done in patients diagnosed with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis? Case-control study
title_full What should be done in patients diagnosed with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis? Case-control study
title_fullStr What should be done in patients diagnosed with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis? Case-control study
title_full_unstemmed What should be done in patients diagnosed with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis? Case-control study
title_short What should be done in patients diagnosed with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis? Case-control study
title_sort what should be done in patients diagnosed with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis case control study
topic cholecystitis
cholecystectomy; xanthogranulomatous.
url https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=nci&un=NCI-35848
work_keys_str_mv AT tolgacanbak whatshouldbedoneinpatientsdiagnosedwithxanthogranulomatouscholecystitiscasecontrolstudy
AT aylinacar whatshouldbedoneinpatientsdiagnosedwithxanthogranulomatouscholecystitiscasecontrolstudy
AT huseyinkeremtolan whatshouldbedoneinpatientsdiagnosedwithxanthogranulomatouscholecystitiscasecontrolstudy