CD163 versus CD68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphoma

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) is a B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder with a relatively good prognosis. A small but significant percentage of patients, however, will respond poorly to therapy. A recent gene expression profiling study has identified a macropha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harris Jonathan A, Jain Salvia, Ren Qinghu, Zarineh Alirezah, Liu Cynthia, Ibrahim Sherif
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-01-01
Series:Diagnostic Pathology
Online Access:http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/7/1/12
_version_ 1818395086960984064
author Harris Jonathan A
Jain Salvia
Ren Qinghu
Zarineh Alirezah
Liu Cynthia
Ibrahim Sherif
author_facet Harris Jonathan A
Jain Salvia
Ren Qinghu
Zarineh Alirezah
Liu Cynthia
Ibrahim Sherif
author_sort Harris Jonathan A
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) is a B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder with a relatively good prognosis. A small but significant percentage of patients, however, will respond poorly to therapy. A recent gene expression profiling study has identified a macrophage signature which has been correlated with primary treatment failure, and immunohistochemical tissue microarray for CD68 was shown to reflect the gene signature as a potentially clinically useful marker to predict adverse prognosis.</p> <p>We examined 44 cases of CHL, mostly nodular sclerosis subtype, in which the immunohistochemical stains for the histiocytic markers CD68 and CD163 were performed. The staining intensity was graded for each stain (< 5, 5-25, and > 25 percent of cells positive in the Hodgkin cell (HC) rich nodules) and background staining characteristics were recorded.</p> <p>CD163 staining was lower than CD68 in HC rich nodules, with lower background staining (p 0.03). There was no significant difference between either CD68 or CD163 and disease recurrence in a subset (N = 41) of cases.</p> <p>In conclusion, we demonstrate that CD163 staining is lower than CD68, with less non-specific staining of background inflammatory cells and Hodgkin cells, therefore is a better marker for tumor associated macrophages. However, we did not identify a correlation between staining for CD68 or CD163 and recurrence of disease.</p> <p>Virtual slides</p> <p>The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here:</p> <p><url>http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1460518258831620</url></p>
first_indexed 2024-12-14T06:11:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d3251c72d8cb44edaea0244bfc659a9e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1746-1596
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T06:11:31Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Diagnostic Pathology
spelling doaj.art-d3251c72d8cb44edaea0244bfc659a9e2022-12-21T23:14:09ZengBMCDiagnostic Pathology1746-15962012-01-01711210.1186/1746-1596-7-12CD163 versus CD68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphomaHarris Jonathan AJain SalviaRen QinghuZarineh AlirezahLiu CynthiaIbrahim Sherif<p>Abstract</p> <p>Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) is a B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder with a relatively good prognosis. A small but significant percentage of patients, however, will respond poorly to therapy. A recent gene expression profiling study has identified a macrophage signature which has been correlated with primary treatment failure, and immunohistochemical tissue microarray for CD68 was shown to reflect the gene signature as a potentially clinically useful marker to predict adverse prognosis.</p> <p>We examined 44 cases of CHL, mostly nodular sclerosis subtype, in which the immunohistochemical stains for the histiocytic markers CD68 and CD163 were performed. The staining intensity was graded for each stain (< 5, 5-25, and > 25 percent of cells positive in the Hodgkin cell (HC) rich nodules) and background staining characteristics were recorded.</p> <p>CD163 staining was lower than CD68 in HC rich nodules, with lower background staining (p 0.03). There was no significant difference between either CD68 or CD163 and disease recurrence in a subset (N = 41) of cases.</p> <p>In conclusion, we demonstrate that CD163 staining is lower than CD68, with less non-specific staining of background inflammatory cells and Hodgkin cells, therefore is a better marker for tumor associated macrophages. However, we did not identify a correlation between staining for CD68 or CD163 and recurrence of disease.</p> <p>Virtual slides</p> <p>The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here:</p> <p><url>http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1460518258831620</url></p>http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/7/1/12
spellingShingle Harris Jonathan A
Jain Salvia
Ren Qinghu
Zarineh Alirezah
Liu Cynthia
Ibrahim Sherif
CD163 versus CD68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphoma
Diagnostic Pathology
title CD163 versus CD68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphoma
title_full CD163 versus CD68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphoma
title_fullStr CD163 versus CD68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed CD163 versus CD68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphoma
title_short CD163 versus CD68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphoma
title_sort cd163 versus cd68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphoma
url http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/7/1/12
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisjonathana cd163versuscd68intumorassociatedmacrophagesofclassicalhodgkinlymphoma
AT jainsalvia cd163versuscd68intumorassociatedmacrophagesofclassicalhodgkinlymphoma
AT renqinghu cd163versuscd68intumorassociatedmacrophagesofclassicalhodgkinlymphoma
AT zarinehalirezah cd163versuscd68intumorassociatedmacrophagesofclassicalhodgkinlymphoma
AT liucynthia cd163versuscd68intumorassociatedmacrophagesofclassicalhodgkinlymphoma
AT ibrahimsherif cd163versuscd68intumorassociatedmacrophagesofclassicalhodgkinlymphoma