Comparison of Fossil Fuel and Geothermal Energy Sources Used for Greenhouse Heating
The most extensive and effective environmentally controlled production takes place in greenhouses. New innovations and developments for greenhouse production go hand in hand with efforts for sustainability. The greenhouses must be heated to ensure high yields and high quality. However, high heating...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
2016-10-01
|
Series: | Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/863 |
_version_ | 1797923566016004096 |
---|---|
author | Abdullah Nafi Baytorun Derya Önder Özkan Gügercin |
author_facet | Abdullah Nafi Baytorun Derya Önder Özkan Gügercin |
author_sort | Abdullah Nafi Baytorun |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The most extensive and effective environmentally controlled production takes place in greenhouses. New innovations and developments for greenhouse production go hand in hand with efforts for sustainability. The greenhouses must be heated to ensure high yields and high quality. However, high heating cost (20%-60%) adversely influences production. Costs Sustainability of greenhouse production can only be maintained with increase of energy efficiency. Use of renewable energy sources in place of fossil fuels is only means to increase energy efficiency. In this work, fossil fuels and geothermal energy used for heating of greenhouses are compared based on production cost and CO2 emissions to atmosphere. The results showed that greenhouse production in Aydın with geothermal energy price of 0.06 ₺/kWh will be very advantageous compared to greenhouse tomato production in Kütahya, which can only compete with that in Antalya. Carbon dioxide emission in plastic greenhouses with double layer PE plastic heat insulation in Kütahya was 199.4 kg/m2 when imported coal was used for heating. The emissions in similar type plastic greenhouses, again heated with coal, in Aydın and Antalya were 74.4 kg/m2 and 55.5 kg/m2, respectively. Greenhouses in geothermal energy rich areas will be very advantageous, based on cost of production and CO2 emission, compared to that in Antalya region if they are heated with geothermal energy. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T14:48:25Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d3286d64291c43129fd2f962a86c69ed |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2148-127X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T14:48:25Z |
publishDate | 2016-10-01 |
publisher | Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP) |
record_format | Article |
series | Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology |
spelling | doaj.art-d3286d64291c43129fd2f962a86c69ed2023-02-15T16:07:45ZengTurkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology2148-127X2016-10-0141083283910.24925/turjaf.v4i10.832-839.863388Comparison of Fossil Fuel and Geothermal Energy Sources Used for Greenhouse HeatingAbdullah Nafi Baytorun0Derya Önder1Özkan Gügercin2Çukurova Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Bölümü, 01250 AdanaÇukurova Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Bölümü, 01250 AdanaÇukurova Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Bölümü, 01250 AdanaThe most extensive and effective environmentally controlled production takes place in greenhouses. New innovations and developments for greenhouse production go hand in hand with efforts for sustainability. The greenhouses must be heated to ensure high yields and high quality. However, high heating cost (20%-60%) adversely influences production. Costs Sustainability of greenhouse production can only be maintained with increase of energy efficiency. Use of renewable energy sources in place of fossil fuels is only means to increase energy efficiency. In this work, fossil fuels and geothermal energy used for heating of greenhouses are compared based on production cost and CO2 emissions to atmosphere. The results showed that greenhouse production in Aydın with geothermal energy price of 0.06 ₺/kWh will be very advantageous compared to greenhouse tomato production in Kütahya, which can only compete with that in Antalya. Carbon dioxide emission in plastic greenhouses with double layer PE plastic heat insulation in Kütahya was 199.4 kg/m2 when imported coal was used for heating. The emissions in similar type plastic greenhouses, again heated with coal, in Aydın and Antalya were 74.4 kg/m2 and 55.5 kg/m2, respectively. Greenhouses in geothermal energy rich areas will be very advantageous, based on cost of production and CO2 emission, compared to that in Antalya region if they are heated with geothermal energy.http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/863Sera ısıtmasıJeotermal enerjiFosil enerjiCO2 emisyonuIsı gereksinimi |
spellingShingle | Abdullah Nafi Baytorun Derya Önder Özkan Gügercin Comparison of Fossil Fuel and Geothermal Energy Sources Used for Greenhouse Heating Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology Sera ısıtması Jeotermal enerji Fosil enerji CO2 emisyonu Isı gereksinimi |
title | Comparison of Fossil Fuel and Geothermal Energy Sources Used for Greenhouse Heating |
title_full | Comparison of Fossil Fuel and Geothermal Energy Sources Used for Greenhouse Heating |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Fossil Fuel and Geothermal Energy Sources Used for Greenhouse Heating |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Fossil Fuel and Geothermal Energy Sources Used for Greenhouse Heating |
title_short | Comparison of Fossil Fuel and Geothermal Energy Sources Used for Greenhouse Heating |
title_sort | comparison of fossil fuel and geothermal energy sources used for greenhouse heating |
topic | Sera ısıtması Jeotermal enerji Fosil enerji CO2 emisyonu Isı gereksinimi |
url | http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/863 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdullahnafibaytorun comparisonoffossilfuelandgeothermalenergysourcesusedforgreenhouseheating AT deryaonder comparisonoffossilfuelandgeothermalenergysourcesusedforgreenhouseheating AT ozkangugercin comparisonoffossilfuelandgeothermalenergysourcesusedforgreenhouseheating |