Comparison of Fossil Fuel and Geothermal Energy Sources Used for Greenhouse Heating

The most extensive and effective environmentally controlled production takes place in greenhouses. New innovations and developments for greenhouse production go hand in hand with efforts for sustainability. The greenhouses must be heated to ensure high yields and high quality. However, high heating...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdullah Nafi Baytorun, Derya Önder, Özkan Gügercin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP) 2016-10-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/863
_version_ 1797923566016004096
author Abdullah Nafi Baytorun
Derya Önder
Özkan Gügercin
author_facet Abdullah Nafi Baytorun
Derya Önder
Özkan Gügercin
author_sort Abdullah Nafi Baytorun
collection DOAJ
description The most extensive and effective environmentally controlled production takes place in greenhouses. New innovations and developments for greenhouse production go hand in hand with efforts for sustainability. The greenhouses must be heated to ensure high yields and high quality. However, high heating cost (20%-60%) adversely influences production. Costs Sustainability of greenhouse production can only be maintained with increase of energy efficiency. Use of renewable energy sources in place of fossil fuels is only means to increase energy efficiency. In this work, fossil fuels and geothermal energy used for heating of greenhouses are compared based on production cost and CO2 emissions to atmosphere. The results showed that greenhouse production in Aydın with geothermal energy price of 0.06 ₺/kWh will be very advantageous compared to greenhouse tomato production in Kütahya, which can only compete with that in Antalya. Carbon dioxide emission in plastic greenhouses with double layer PE plastic heat insulation in Kütahya was 199.4 kg/m2 when imported coal was used for heating. The emissions in similar type plastic greenhouses, again heated with coal, in Aydın and Antalya were 74.4 kg/m2 and 55.5 kg/m2, respectively. Greenhouses in geothermal energy rich areas will be very advantageous, based on cost of production and CO2 emission, compared to that in Antalya region if they are heated with geothermal energy.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T14:48:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d3286d64291c43129fd2f962a86c69ed
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2148-127X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T14:48:25Z
publishDate 2016-10-01
publisher Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
record_format Article
series Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology
spelling doaj.art-d3286d64291c43129fd2f962a86c69ed2023-02-15T16:07:45ZengTurkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology2148-127X2016-10-0141083283910.24925/turjaf.v4i10.832-839.863388Comparison of Fossil Fuel and Geothermal Energy Sources Used for Greenhouse HeatingAbdullah Nafi Baytorun0Derya Önder1Özkan Gügercin2Çukurova Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Bölümü, 01250 AdanaÇukurova Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Bölümü, 01250 AdanaÇukurova Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Bölümü, 01250 AdanaThe most extensive and effective environmentally controlled production takes place in greenhouses. New innovations and developments for greenhouse production go hand in hand with efforts for sustainability. The greenhouses must be heated to ensure high yields and high quality. However, high heating cost (20%-60%) adversely influences production. Costs Sustainability of greenhouse production can only be maintained with increase of energy efficiency. Use of renewable energy sources in place of fossil fuels is only means to increase energy efficiency. In this work, fossil fuels and geothermal energy used for heating of greenhouses are compared based on production cost and CO2 emissions to atmosphere. The results showed that greenhouse production in Aydın with geothermal energy price of 0.06 ₺/kWh will be very advantageous compared to greenhouse tomato production in Kütahya, which can only compete with that in Antalya. Carbon dioxide emission in plastic greenhouses with double layer PE plastic heat insulation in Kütahya was 199.4 kg/m2 when imported coal was used for heating. The emissions in similar type plastic greenhouses, again heated with coal, in Aydın and Antalya were 74.4 kg/m2 and 55.5 kg/m2, respectively. Greenhouses in geothermal energy rich areas will be very advantageous, based on cost of production and CO2 emission, compared to that in Antalya region if they are heated with geothermal energy.http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/863Sera ısıtmasıJeotermal enerjiFosil enerjiCO2 emisyonuIsı gereksinimi
spellingShingle Abdullah Nafi Baytorun
Derya Önder
Özkan Gügercin
Comparison of Fossil Fuel and Geothermal Energy Sources Used for Greenhouse Heating
Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology
Sera ısıtması
Jeotermal enerji
Fosil enerji
CO2 emisyonu
Isı gereksinimi
title Comparison of Fossil Fuel and Geothermal Energy Sources Used for Greenhouse Heating
title_full Comparison of Fossil Fuel and Geothermal Energy Sources Used for Greenhouse Heating
title_fullStr Comparison of Fossil Fuel and Geothermal Energy Sources Used for Greenhouse Heating
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Fossil Fuel and Geothermal Energy Sources Used for Greenhouse Heating
title_short Comparison of Fossil Fuel and Geothermal Energy Sources Used for Greenhouse Heating
title_sort comparison of fossil fuel and geothermal energy sources used for greenhouse heating
topic Sera ısıtması
Jeotermal enerji
Fosil enerji
CO2 emisyonu
Isı gereksinimi
url http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/863
work_keys_str_mv AT abdullahnafibaytorun comparisonoffossilfuelandgeothermalenergysourcesusedforgreenhouseheating
AT deryaonder comparisonoffossilfuelandgeothermalenergysourcesusedforgreenhouseheating
AT ozkangugercin comparisonoffossilfuelandgeothermalenergysourcesusedforgreenhouseheating