Validation of GRACE and GRACE-FO Mascon Data for the Study of Polar Motion Excitation

In this study, we calculate the hydrological plus cryospheric excitation of polar motion (hydrological plus cryospheric angular momentum, HAM/CAM) using mascon solutions based on observations from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO) missions. We compare...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Justyna Śliwińska, Małgorzata Wińska, Jolanta Nastula
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/6/1152
_version_ 1827697444245209088
author Justyna Śliwińska
Małgorzata Wińska
Jolanta Nastula
author_facet Justyna Śliwińska
Małgorzata Wińska
Jolanta Nastula
author_sort Justyna Śliwińska
collection DOAJ
description In this study, we calculate the hydrological plus cryospheric excitation of polar motion (hydrological plus cryospheric angular momentum, HAM/CAM) using mascon solutions based on observations from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO) missions. We compare and evaluate HAM/CAM computed from GRACE and GRACE-FO mascon data provided by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), the Center for Space Research (CSR), and the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). A comparison with HAM obtained from the Land Surface Discharge Model is also provided. An analysis of HAM/CAM and HAM is performed for overall variability, trends, and seasonal and non-seasonal variations. The HAM/CAM and HAM estimates are validated using the geodetic residual time series (GAO), which is an estimation of the hydrological plus cryospheric signal in geodetically observed polar motion excitation. In general, all mascon datasets are found to be equally suitable for the determination of overall, seasonal, and non-seasonal HAM/CAM oscillations, but some differences in trends remain. The use of an ellipsoidal correction, implemented in the newest solution from CSR, does not noticeably affect the consistency between HAM/CAM and GAO. Analysis of the data from the first two years of the GRACE-FO mission indicates that the current accuracy of HAM/CAM from GRACE-FO mascon data meets expectations, and the root mean square deviation of HAM/CAM components are between 5 and 6 milliarcseconds. The findings from this study can be helpful in assessing the role of satellite gravimetry in polar motion studies and may contribute towards future improvements to GRACE-FO data processing.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T13:09:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d33c2b53ad554e09bff332486a6f0a62
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T13:09:03Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-d33c2b53ad554e09bff332486a6f0a622023-11-21T10:56:17ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922021-03-01136115210.3390/rs13061152Validation of GRACE and GRACE-FO Mascon Data for the Study of Polar Motion ExcitationJustyna Śliwińska0Małgorzata Wińska1Jolanta Nastula2Space Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, 00-716 Warsaw, PolandFaculty of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-637 Warsaw, PolandSpace Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, 00-716 Warsaw, PolandIn this study, we calculate the hydrological plus cryospheric excitation of polar motion (hydrological plus cryospheric angular momentum, HAM/CAM) using mascon solutions based on observations from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO) missions. We compare and evaluate HAM/CAM computed from GRACE and GRACE-FO mascon data provided by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), the Center for Space Research (CSR), and the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). A comparison with HAM obtained from the Land Surface Discharge Model is also provided. An analysis of HAM/CAM and HAM is performed for overall variability, trends, and seasonal and non-seasonal variations. The HAM/CAM and HAM estimates are validated using the geodetic residual time series (GAO), which is an estimation of the hydrological plus cryospheric signal in geodetically observed polar motion excitation. In general, all mascon datasets are found to be equally suitable for the determination of overall, seasonal, and non-seasonal HAM/CAM oscillations, but some differences in trends remain. The use of an ellipsoidal correction, implemented in the newest solution from CSR, does not noticeably affect the consistency between HAM/CAM and GAO. Analysis of the data from the first two years of the GRACE-FO mission indicates that the current accuracy of HAM/CAM from GRACE-FO mascon data meets expectations, and the root mean square deviation of HAM/CAM components are between 5 and 6 milliarcseconds. The findings from this study can be helpful in assessing the role of satellite gravimetry in polar motion studies and may contribute towards future improvements to GRACE-FO data processing.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/6/1152GRACEGRACE Follow-OnmasconEarth rotationpolar motion excitationhydrosphere
spellingShingle Justyna Śliwińska
Małgorzata Wińska
Jolanta Nastula
Validation of GRACE and GRACE-FO Mascon Data for the Study of Polar Motion Excitation
Remote Sensing
GRACE
GRACE Follow-On
mascon
Earth rotation
polar motion excitation
hydrosphere
title Validation of GRACE and GRACE-FO Mascon Data for the Study of Polar Motion Excitation
title_full Validation of GRACE and GRACE-FO Mascon Data for the Study of Polar Motion Excitation
title_fullStr Validation of GRACE and GRACE-FO Mascon Data for the Study of Polar Motion Excitation
title_full_unstemmed Validation of GRACE and GRACE-FO Mascon Data for the Study of Polar Motion Excitation
title_short Validation of GRACE and GRACE-FO Mascon Data for the Study of Polar Motion Excitation
title_sort validation of grace and grace fo mascon data for the study of polar motion excitation
topic GRACE
GRACE Follow-On
mascon
Earth rotation
polar motion excitation
hydrosphere
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/6/1152
work_keys_str_mv AT justynasliwinska validationofgraceandgracefomascondataforthestudyofpolarmotionexcitation
AT małgorzatawinska validationofgraceandgracefomascondataforthestudyofpolarmotionexcitation
AT jolantanastula validationofgraceandgracefomascondataforthestudyofpolarmotionexcitation