Cardiac dose in the treatment of synchronous bilateral breast cancer patients between three different radiotherapy techniques (VMAT, IMRT, and 3D CRT)
Abstract Purpose Synchronous bilateral irradiation of both mammary glands and chest wall is a challenging task due to technical difficulties and limited evidence supporting an optimal technique to improve treatment outcomes. We studied and compared the dosimetry data of three radiotherapy techniques...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer
2023-03-01
|
Series: | Discover Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-023-00636-z |
_version_ | 1797864386846523392 |
---|---|
author | Nidal Salim Alexey Popodko Kristina Tumanova Alexandr Stolbovoy Irina Lagkueva Vadim Ragimov |
author_facet | Nidal Salim Alexey Popodko Kristina Tumanova Alexandr Stolbovoy Irina Lagkueva Vadim Ragimov |
author_sort | Nidal Salim |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Purpose Synchronous bilateral irradiation of both mammary glands and chest wall is a challenging task due to technical difficulties and limited evidence supporting an optimal technique to improve treatment outcomes. We studied and compared the dosimetry data of three radiotherapy techniques to select the most optimal one. Methods We compared three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment (3D CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) during irradiation of synchronous bilateral breast cancer in nine patients followed by examination of dose distribution to the cardiac conduction system (SA node, AV node and Bundle of His), myocardium, lungs, left anterior descending artery (LADA) and right coronary artery (RCA) . Results VMAT is the most sparing technique for SBBC treatment. Even though doses to the SA node, AV node and Bundle of His were higher with VMAT (Dmean were 3.75 ± 0.62, 2.58 ± 0.83 and 3.03 ± 1.18 Gy respectively) compared with 3D CRT (Dmean were 2.61 ± 0.66, 1.52 ± 0.38 and 1.88 ± 0.70 Gy respectively), this difference is statistically insignificant. Doses to the right and left lung (average Dmean = 12.65 ± 3.20 Gy, V20Gy = 24.12 ± 6.25%), myocardium (Dmean = 5.33 ± 1.51 Gy, V10Gy = 9.80 ± 3.83%, V20Gy = 7.19 ± 3.15%, V25Gy = 6.20 ± 2.93%), and LADA (Dmean = 10.04 ± 4.92 Gy, V20Gy = 18.17 ± 13.24% and V25Gy = 15.41 ± 12.19%) were highest with 3D CRT. The highest Dmean in the cardiac conduction system (5.30 ± 2.23, 3.15 ± 1.61 and 3.89 ± 1.85 Gy respectively) was observed with IMRT, and a similar effect was noted in RCA (Dmean = 7.48 ± 2.11 Gy). Conclusion VMAT is the optimal and satisfactory radiation therapy technique for sparing organs at risk (OARs). With VMAT, a lower Dmean value was noted in the myocardium, LADA, and lungs. The use of 3D CRT significantly increases the dose of radiation reaching the lungs, myocardium, and LADA, which can subsequently cause cardiovascular and lung complications, but not in the cardiac conduction system. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-09T22:50:52Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d33f72d1a5e24de18f0ff4d50144d522 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2730-6011 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-09T22:50:52Z |
publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
publisher | Springer |
record_format | Article |
series | Discover Oncology |
spelling | doaj.art-d33f72d1a5e24de18f0ff4d50144d5222023-03-22T11:39:31ZengSpringerDiscover Oncology2730-60112023-03-0114111110.1007/s12672-023-00636-zCardiac dose in the treatment of synchronous bilateral breast cancer patients between three different radiotherapy techniques (VMAT, IMRT, and 3D CRT)Nidal Salim0Alexey Popodko1Kristina Tumanova2Alexandr Stolbovoy3Irina Lagkueva4Vadim Ragimov5Department of Radiation Oncology, European Medical CenterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, European Medical CenterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, European Medical CenterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, European Medical CenterRussian X-Radiology Research CenterRussian X-Radiology Research CenterAbstract Purpose Synchronous bilateral irradiation of both mammary glands and chest wall is a challenging task due to technical difficulties and limited evidence supporting an optimal technique to improve treatment outcomes. We studied and compared the dosimetry data of three radiotherapy techniques to select the most optimal one. Methods We compared three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment (3D CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) during irradiation of synchronous bilateral breast cancer in nine patients followed by examination of dose distribution to the cardiac conduction system (SA node, AV node and Bundle of His), myocardium, lungs, left anterior descending artery (LADA) and right coronary artery (RCA) . Results VMAT is the most sparing technique for SBBC treatment. Even though doses to the SA node, AV node and Bundle of His were higher with VMAT (Dmean were 3.75 ± 0.62, 2.58 ± 0.83 and 3.03 ± 1.18 Gy respectively) compared with 3D CRT (Dmean were 2.61 ± 0.66, 1.52 ± 0.38 and 1.88 ± 0.70 Gy respectively), this difference is statistically insignificant. Doses to the right and left lung (average Dmean = 12.65 ± 3.20 Gy, V20Gy = 24.12 ± 6.25%), myocardium (Dmean = 5.33 ± 1.51 Gy, V10Gy = 9.80 ± 3.83%, V20Gy = 7.19 ± 3.15%, V25Gy = 6.20 ± 2.93%), and LADA (Dmean = 10.04 ± 4.92 Gy, V20Gy = 18.17 ± 13.24% and V25Gy = 15.41 ± 12.19%) were highest with 3D CRT. The highest Dmean in the cardiac conduction system (5.30 ± 2.23, 3.15 ± 1.61 and 3.89 ± 1.85 Gy respectively) was observed with IMRT, and a similar effect was noted in RCA (Dmean = 7.48 ± 2.11 Gy). Conclusion VMAT is the optimal and satisfactory radiation therapy technique for sparing organs at risk (OARs). With VMAT, a lower Dmean value was noted in the myocardium, LADA, and lungs. The use of 3D CRT significantly increases the dose of radiation reaching the lungs, myocardium, and LADA, which can subsequently cause cardiovascular and lung complications, but not in the cardiac conduction system.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-023-00636-zSynchronous bilateral breast cancerRadiation therapy3D CRTIMRTVMATCardiac conduction system |
spellingShingle | Nidal Salim Alexey Popodko Kristina Tumanova Alexandr Stolbovoy Irina Lagkueva Vadim Ragimov Cardiac dose in the treatment of synchronous bilateral breast cancer patients between three different radiotherapy techniques (VMAT, IMRT, and 3D CRT) Discover Oncology Synchronous bilateral breast cancer Radiation therapy 3D CRT IMRT VMAT Cardiac conduction system |
title | Cardiac dose in the treatment of synchronous bilateral breast cancer patients between three different radiotherapy techniques (VMAT, IMRT, and 3D CRT) |
title_full | Cardiac dose in the treatment of synchronous bilateral breast cancer patients between three different radiotherapy techniques (VMAT, IMRT, and 3D CRT) |
title_fullStr | Cardiac dose in the treatment of synchronous bilateral breast cancer patients between three different radiotherapy techniques (VMAT, IMRT, and 3D CRT) |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiac dose in the treatment of synchronous bilateral breast cancer patients between three different radiotherapy techniques (VMAT, IMRT, and 3D CRT) |
title_short | Cardiac dose in the treatment of synchronous bilateral breast cancer patients between three different radiotherapy techniques (VMAT, IMRT, and 3D CRT) |
title_sort | cardiac dose in the treatment of synchronous bilateral breast cancer patients between three different radiotherapy techniques vmat imrt and 3d crt |
topic | Synchronous bilateral breast cancer Radiation therapy 3D CRT IMRT VMAT Cardiac conduction system |
url | https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-023-00636-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nidalsalim cardiacdoseinthetreatmentofsynchronousbilateralbreastcancerpatientsbetweenthreedifferentradiotherapytechniquesvmatimrtand3dcrt AT alexeypopodko cardiacdoseinthetreatmentofsynchronousbilateralbreastcancerpatientsbetweenthreedifferentradiotherapytechniquesvmatimrtand3dcrt AT kristinatumanova cardiacdoseinthetreatmentofsynchronousbilateralbreastcancerpatientsbetweenthreedifferentradiotherapytechniquesvmatimrtand3dcrt AT alexandrstolbovoy cardiacdoseinthetreatmentofsynchronousbilateralbreastcancerpatientsbetweenthreedifferentradiotherapytechniquesvmatimrtand3dcrt AT irinalagkueva cardiacdoseinthetreatmentofsynchronousbilateralbreastcancerpatientsbetweenthreedifferentradiotherapytechniquesvmatimrtand3dcrt AT vadimragimov cardiacdoseinthetreatmentofsynchronousbilateralbreastcancerpatientsbetweenthreedifferentradiotherapytechniquesvmatimrtand3dcrt |