Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Decision Making under Ambiguity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
In the last decade, decision-making has been proposed to have a central role in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) aetiology, since patients show pathological doubt and an apparent inability to make decisions. Here, we aimed to comprehensively review decision making under ambiguity, as measured by...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Brain Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/2/143 |
_version_ | 1797408401667391488 |
---|---|
author | Veronica Nisticò Andrea De Angelis Roberto Erro Benedetta Demartini Lucia Ricciardi |
author_facet | Veronica Nisticò Andrea De Angelis Roberto Erro Benedetta Demartini Lucia Ricciardi |
author_sort | Veronica Nisticò |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In the last decade, decision-making has been proposed to have a central role in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) aetiology, since patients show pathological doubt and an apparent inability to make decisions. Here, we aimed to comprehensively review decision making under ambiguity, as measured by the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), in OCD, using a meta-analytic approach. According to PRISMA Guidelines, we selected 26 studies for a systematic review and, amongst them, 16 studies were included in a meta-analysis, comprising a total of 846 OCD patients and 763 healthy controls (HC). Our results show that OCD patients perform significantly lower than HC at the IGT, pointing towards the direction of a decision making impairment. In particular, this deficit seems to emerge mainly in the last three blocks of the IGT. IGT scores in OCD patients under the age of 18 were still significantly lower than in HC. Finally, no difference emerged between medicated and unmedicated patients, since they both scored significantly lower at the IGT compared to HC. In conclusion, our results are in line with the hypothesis according to which decision making impairment might represent a potential endophenotype lying between the clinical manifestation of OCD and its neurobiological aetiology. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T03:58:54Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d360713903fd459aba6cfe4f8c031388 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2076-3425 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T03:58:54Z |
publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Brain Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-d360713903fd459aba6cfe4f8c0313882023-12-03T14:17:23ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252021-01-0111214310.3390/brainsci11020143Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Decision Making under Ambiguity: A Systematic Review with Meta-AnalysisVeronica Nisticò0Andrea De Angelis1Roberto Erro2Benedetta Demartini3Lucia Ricciardi4Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20142 Milano, ItalyNeurosciences Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London SW17 0RE, UKDipartimento di Medicina, Chirurgia e Odontoiatria “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, Università di Salerno, 84018 Baronissi, Salerno, ItalyDipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20142 Milano, ItalyNeurosciences Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London SW17 0RE, UKIn the last decade, decision-making has been proposed to have a central role in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) aetiology, since patients show pathological doubt and an apparent inability to make decisions. Here, we aimed to comprehensively review decision making under ambiguity, as measured by the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), in OCD, using a meta-analytic approach. According to PRISMA Guidelines, we selected 26 studies for a systematic review and, amongst them, 16 studies were included in a meta-analysis, comprising a total of 846 OCD patients and 763 healthy controls (HC). Our results show that OCD patients perform significantly lower than HC at the IGT, pointing towards the direction of a decision making impairment. In particular, this deficit seems to emerge mainly in the last three blocks of the IGT. IGT scores in OCD patients under the age of 18 were still significantly lower than in HC. Finally, no difference emerged between medicated and unmedicated patients, since they both scored significantly lower at the IGT compared to HC. In conclusion, our results are in line with the hypothesis according to which decision making impairment might represent a potential endophenotype lying between the clinical manifestation of OCD and its neurobiological aetiology.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/2/143obsessive-compulsive disorderdecision makingIowa Gambling Taskambiguityriskmeta-analysis |
spellingShingle | Veronica Nisticò Andrea De Angelis Roberto Erro Benedetta Demartini Lucia Ricciardi Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Decision Making under Ambiguity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis Brain Sciences obsessive-compulsive disorder decision making Iowa Gambling Task ambiguity risk meta-analysis |
title | Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Decision Making under Ambiguity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Decision Making under Ambiguity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Decision Making under Ambiguity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Decision Making under Ambiguity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Decision Making under Ambiguity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | obsessive compulsive disorder and decision making under ambiguity a systematic review with meta analysis |
topic | obsessive-compulsive disorder decision making Iowa Gambling Task ambiguity risk meta-analysis |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/2/143 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT veronicanistico obsessivecompulsivedisorderanddecisionmakingunderambiguityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT andreadeangelis obsessivecompulsivedisorderanddecisionmakingunderambiguityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT robertoerro obsessivecompulsivedisorderanddecisionmakingunderambiguityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT benedettademartini obsessivecompulsivedisorderanddecisionmakingunderambiguityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT luciaricciardi obsessivecompulsivedisorderanddecisionmakingunderambiguityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis |