Reliability‐based hull geometry optimisation of a point‐absorber wave energy converter with power take‐off structural reliability objectives

Abstract Recent studies have focused on optimising wave energy converter (WEC) designs, maximising their power performance and techno‐economic feasibility. Reliability has yet to be fully considered in these formulations, despite its impact on cost and performance. In this study, this gap is address...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Garcia‐Teruel, Caitlyn E. Clark
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-10-01
Series:IET Renewable Power Generation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.12249
_version_ 1798031633849253888
author Anna Garcia‐Teruel
Caitlyn E. Clark
author_facet Anna Garcia‐Teruel
Caitlyn E. Clark
author_sort Anna Garcia‐Teruel
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Recent studies have focused on optimising wave energy converter (WEC) designs, maximising their power performance and techno‐economic feasibility. Reliability has yet to be fully considered in these formulations, despite its impact on cost and performance. In this study, this gap is addressed by developing a reliability‐based design optimisation framework for WEC hull geometries to explore the trade‐off between power performance and power take‐off (PTO) system damage equivalent loading (DEL). Optimised hull geometries for two sites are considered (from the centre of the North Sea and off the west coast of Norway), and two directions of motions (heave and surge). Results indicate that site characteristics affect the potential power production and DEL for an optimal WEC design. These are also affected by the direction of motion for power extraction, which also significantly changes optimal hull shape characteristics. Optimal surging WEC designs have edges facing oncoming wave directions, while heaving WECs have pointed bottoms, both to streamline movement. Larger, more convex WECs result in greater power production and DEL, while smaller, more concave WECs result in lesser power production and DEL. These findings underline the importance of considering WEC hull geometry in early design processes to optimise cost, power production, and reliability.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T19:59:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d36f02c108004dc6b9552bfe6e972a0c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1752-1416
1752-1424
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T19:59:34Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series IET Renewable Power Generation
spelling doaj.art-d36f02c108004dc6b9552bfe6e972a0c2022-12-22T04:05:41ZengWileyIET Renewable Power Generation1752-14161752-14242021-10-0115143255326810.1049/rpg2.12249Reliability‐based hull geometry optimisation of a point‐absorber wave energy converter with power take‐off structural reliability objectivesAnna Garcia‐Teruel0Caitlyn E. Clark1Institute for Energy Systems School of Engineering The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UKNational Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden Colorado USAAbstract Recent studies have focused on optimising wave energy converter (WEC) designs, maximising their power performance and techno‐economic feasibility. Reliability has yet to be fully considered in these formulations, despite its impact on cost and performance. In this study, this gap is addressed by developing a reliability‐based design optimisation framework for WEC hull geometries to explore the trade‐off between power performance and power take‐off (PTO) system damage equivalent loading (DEL). Optimised hull geometries for two sites are considered (from the centre of the North Sea and off the west coast of Norway), and two directions of motions (heave and surge). Results indicate that site characteristics affect the potential power production and DEL for an optimal WEC design. These are also affected by the direction of motion for power extraction, which also significantly changes optimal hull shape characteristics. Optimal surging WEC designs have edges facing oncoming wave directions, while heaving WECs have pointed bottoms, both to streamline movement. Larger, more convex WECs result in greater power production and DEL, while smaller, more concave WECs result in lesser power production and DEL. These findings underline the importance of considering WEC hull geometry in early design processes to optimise cost, power production, and reliability.https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.12249Tidal and flow energyProject and design engineeringReliabilityOptimisation techniquesWave powerOptimisation
spellingShingle Anna Garcia‐Teruel
Caitlyn E. Clark
Reliability‐based hull geometry optimisation of a point‐absorber wave energy converter with power take‐off structural reliability objectives
IET Renewable Power Generation
Tidal and flow energy
Project and design engineering
Reliability
Optimisation techniques
Wave power
Optimisation
title Reliability‐based hull geometry optimisation of a point‐absorber wave energy converter with power take‐off structural reliability objectives
title_full Reliability‐based hull geometry optimisation of a point‐absorber wave energy converter with power take‐off structural reliability objectives
title_fullStr Reliability‐based hull geometry optimisation of a point‐absorber wave energy converter with power take‐off structural reliability objectives
title_full_unstemmed Reliability‐based hull geometry optimisation of a point‐absorber wave energy converter with power take‐off structural reliability objectives
title_short Reliability‐based hull geometry optimisation of a point‐absorber wave energy converter with power take‐off structural reliability objectives
title_sort reliability based hull geometry optimisation of a point absorber wave energy converter with power take off structural reliability objectives
topic Tidal and flow energy
Project and design engineering
Reliability
Optimisation techniques
Wave power
Optimisation
url https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.12249
work_keys_str_mv AT annagarciateruel reliabilitybasedhullgeometryoptimisationofapointabsorberwaveenergyconverterwithpowertakeoffstructuralreliabilityobjectives
AT caitlyneclark reliabilitybasedhullgeometryoptimisationofapointabsorberwaveenergyconverterwithpowertakeoffstructuralreliabilityobjectives