Research blogging: indexing and registering the change in science 2.0.
Increasing public interest in science information in a digital and 2.0 science era promotes a dramatically, rapid and deep change in science itself. The emergence and expansion of new technologies and internet-based tools is leading to new means to improve scientific methodology and communication, a...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3520957?pdf=render |
_version_ | 1819038967172956160 |
---|---|
author | Sibele Fausto Fabio A Machado Luiz Fernando J Bento Atila Iamarino Tatiana R Nahas David S Munger |
author_facet | Sibele Fausto Fabio A Machado Luiz Fernando J Bento Atila Iamarino Tatiana R Nahas David S Munger |
author_sort | Sibele Fausto |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Increasing public interest in science information in a digital and 2.0 science era promotes a dramatically, rapid and deep change in science itself. The emergence and expansion of new technologies and internet-based tools is leading to new means to improve scientific methodology and communication, assessment, promotion and certification. It allows methods of acquisition, manipulation and storage, generating vast quantities of data that can further facilitate the research process. It also improves access to scientific results through information sharing and discussion. Content previously restricted only to specialists is now available to a wider audience. This context requires new management systems to make scientific knowledge more accessible and useable, including new measures to evaluate the reach of scientific information. The new science and research quality measures are strongly related to the new online technologies and services based in social media. Tools such as blogs, social bookmarks and online reference managers, Twitter and others offer alternative, transparent and more comprehensive information about the active interest, usage and reach of scientific publications. Another of these new filters is the Research Blogging platform, which was created in 2007 and now has over 1,230 active blogs, with over 26,960 entries posted about peer-reviewed research on subjects ranging from Anthropology to Zoology. This study takes a closer look at RB, in order to get insights into its contribution to the rapidly changing landscape of scientific communication. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T08:45:43Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d37b3be5424b4e97a315020beac9fc01 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T08:45:43Z |
publishDate | 2012-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj.art-d37b3be5424b4e97a315020beac9fc012022-12-21T19:09:50ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-01712e5010910.1371/journal.pone.0050109Research blogging: indexing and registering the change in science 2.0.Sibele FaustoFabio A MachadoLuiz Fernando J BentoAtila IamarinoTatiana R NahasDavid S MungerIncreasing public interest in science information in a digital and 2.0 science era promotes a dramatically, rapid and deep change in science itself. The emergence and expansion of new technologies and internet-based tools is leading to new means to improve scientific methodology and communication, assessment, promotion and certification. It allows methods of acquisition, manipulation and storage, generating vast quantities of data that can further facilitate the research process. It also improves access to scientific results through information sharing and discussion. Content previously restricted only to specialists is now available to a wider audience. This context requires new management systems to make scientific knowledge more accessible and useable, including new measures to evaluate the reach of scientific information. The new science and research quality measures are strongly related to the new online technologies and services based in social media. Tools such as blogs, social bookmarks and online reference managers, Twitter and others offer alternative, transparent and more comprehensive information about the active interest, usage and reach of scientific publications. Another of these new filters is the Research Blogging platform, which was created in 2007 and now has over 1,230 active blogs, with over 26,960 entries posted about peer-reviewed research on subjects ranging from Anthropology to Zoology. This study takes a closer look at RB, in order to get insights into its contribution to the rapidly changing landscape of scientific communication.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3520957?pdf=render |
spellingShingle | Sibele Fausto Fabio A Machado Luiz Fernando J Bento Atila Iamarino Tatiana R Nahas David S Munger Research blogging: indexing and registering the change in science 2.0. PLoS ONE |
title | Research blogging: indexing and registering the change in science 2.0. |
title_full | Research blogging: indexing and registering the change in science 2.0. |
title_fullStr | Research blogging: indexing and registering the change in science 2.0. |
title_full_unstemmed | Research blogging: indexing and registering the change in science 2.0. |
title_short | Research blogging: indexing and registering the change in science 2.0. |
title_sort | research blogging indexing and registering the change in science 2 0 |
url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3520957?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sibelefausto researchbloggingindexingandregisteringthechangeinscience20 AT fabioamachado researchbloggingindexingandregisteringthechangeinscience20 AT luizfernandojbento researchbloggingindexingandregisteringthechangeinscience20 AT atilaiamarino researchbloggingindexingandregisteringthechangeinscience20 AT tatianarnahas researchbloggingindexingandregisteringthechangeinscience20 AT davidsmunger researchbloggingindexingandregisteringthechangeinscience20 |