Research blogging: indexing and registering the change in science 2.0.

Increasing public interest in science information in a digital and 2.0 science era promotes a dramatically, rapid and deep change in science itself. The emergence and expansion of new technologies and internet-based tools is leading to new means to improve scientific methodology and communication, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sibele Fausto, Fabio A Machado, Luiz Fernando J Bento, Atila Iamarino, Tatiana R Nahas, David S Munger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3520957?pdf=render
_version_ 1819038967172956160
author Sibele Fausto
Fabio A Machado
Luiz Fernando J Bento
Atila Iamarino
Tatiana R Nahas
David S Munger
author_facet Sibele Fausto
Fabio A Machado
Luiz Fernando J Bento
Atila Iamarino
Tatiana R Nahas
David S Munger
author_sort Sibele Fausto
collection DOAJ
description Increasing public interest in science information in a digital and 2.0 science era promotes a dramatically, rapid and deep change in science itself. The emergence and expansion of new technologies and internet-based tools is leading to new means to improve scientific methodology and communication, assessment, promotion and certification. It allows methods of acquisition, manipulation and storage, generating vast quantities of data that can further facilitate the research process. It also improves access to scientific results through information sharing and discussion. Content previously restricted only to specialists is now available to a wider audience. This context requires new management systems to make scientific knowledge more accessible and useable, including new measures to evaluate the reach of scientific information. The new science and research quality measures are strongly related to the new online technologies and services based in social media. Tools such as blogs, social bookmarks and online reference managers, Twitter and others offer alternative, transparent and more comprehensive information about the active interest, usage and reach of scientific publications. Another of these new filters is the Research Blogging platform, which was created in 2007 and now has over 1,230 active blogs, with over 26,960 entries posted about peer-reviewed research on subjects ranging from Anthropology to Zoology. This study takes a closer look at RB, in order to get insights into its contribution to the rapidly changing landscape of scientific communication.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T08:45:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d37b3be5424b4e97a315020beac9fc01
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T08:45:43Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-d37b3be5424b4e97a315020beac9fc012022-12-21T19:09:50ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-01712e5010910.1371/journal.pone.0050109Research blogging: indexing and registering the change in science 2.0.Sibele FaustoFabio A MachadoLuiz Fernando J BentoAtila IamarinoTatiana R NahasDavid S MungerIncreasing public interest in science information in a digital and 2.0 science era promotes a dramatically, rapid and deep change in science itself. The emergence and expansion of new technologies and internet-based tools is leading to new means to improve scientific methodology and communication, assessment, promotion and certification. It allows methods of acquisition, manipulation and storage, generating vast quantities of data that can further facilitate the research process. It also improves access to scientific results through information sharing and discussion. Content previously restricted only to specialists is now available to a wider audience. This context requires new management systems to make scientific knowledge more accessible and useable, including new measures to evaluate the reach of scientific information. The new science and research quality measures are strongly related to the new online technologies and services based in social media. Tools such as blogs, social bookmarks and online reference managers, Twitter and others offer alternative, transparent and more comprehensive information about the active interest, usage and reach of scientific publications. Another of these new filters is the Research Blogging platform, which was created in 2007 and now has over 1,230 active blogs, with over 26,960 entries posted about peer-reviewed research on subjects ranging from Anthropology to Zoology. This study takes a closer look at RB, in order to get insights into its contribution to the rapidly changing landscape of scientific communication.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3520957?pdf=render
spellingShingle Sibele Fausto
Fabio A Machado
Luiz Fernando J Bento
Atila Iamarino
Tatiana R Nahas
David S Munger
Research blogging: indexing and registering the change in science 2.0.
PLoS ONE
title Research blogging: indexing and registering the change in science 2.0.
title_full Research blogging: indexing and registering the change in science 2.0.
title_fullStr Research blogging: indexing and registering the change in science 2.0.
title_full_unstemmed Research blogging: indexing and registering the change in science 2.0.
title_short Research blogging: indexing and registering the change in science 2.0.
title_sort research blogging indexing and registering the change in science 2 0
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3520957?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT sibelefausto researchbloggingindexingandregisteringthechangeinscience20
AT fabioamachado researchbloggingindexingandregisteringthechangeinscience20
AT luizfernandojbento researchbloggingindexingandregisteringthechangeinscience20
AT atilaiamarino researchbloggingindexingandregisteringthechangeinscience20
AT tatianarnahas researchbloggingindexingandregisteringthechangeinscience20
AT davidsmunger researchbloggingindexingandregisteringthechangeinscience20