Utility of the detection of <it>Plasmodium </it>parasites for the diagnosis of malaria in endemic areas

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In populations where the prevalence of infection with <it>Plasmodium </it>parasites is high, blood tests that identify <it>Plasmodium </it>parasites in patients with fever may lead to false positive diagnosis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Szeless Thomas, Perneger Thomas V, Rougemont André
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-05-01
Series:BMC Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/6/81
_version_ 1818272217506512896
author Szeless Thomas
Perneger Thomas V
Rougemont André
author_facet Szeless Thomas
Perneger Thomas V
Rougemont André
author_sort Szeless Thomas
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In populations where the prevalence of infection with <it>Plasmodium </it>parasites is high, blood tests that identify <it>Plasmodium </it>parasites in patients with fever may lead to false positive diagnosis of malaria-disease. We characterised the diminishing value of the parasite detection test as a function of the prevalence of infection.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We computed the ability of the parasite detection test to identify malaria at various levels of prevalence (0% to 90%), assuming plausible estimates of sensitivity (95% and 85%) and specificity (99% and 95%) for the detection of parasites. In each situation, we computed likelihood ratios of malaria (or absence of malaria) for positive and negative parasite detection tests. Likelihood ratios were classified as clinically useful (≥ 10), intermediate (5–10), or unhelpful (<5).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Likelihood ratios of positive tests were strongly related to the prevalence of infection in the general population: a positive test was unhelpful when the prevalence was 20% or more, and useful only when prevalence was 5% or less. The sensitivity and specificity of the test had little influence on these results. Likelihood ratios of negative tests were clinically useful when prevalence was 70% or less, but only for high levels of sensitivity (95%). If sensitivity was low (85%), the negative test was at best of intermediate utility, and was unhelpful if the prevalence of asymptomatic infection exceeded 30%.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Identification of <it>Plasmodium </it>parasites supports a diagnosis of malaria only in areas where the prevalence of <it>Plasmodium </it>infection is low. Wherever this prevalence exceeds about 20%, a positive test is clinically unhelpful.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-12T21:38:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d37b6e7621fa4f1f890f7f59020e6edb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2334
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T21:38:34Z
publishDate 2006-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj.art-d37b6e7621fa4f1f890f7f59020e6edb2022-12-22T00:11:08ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342006-05-01618110.1186/1471-2334-6-81Utility of the detection of <it>Plasmodium </it>parasites for the diagnosis of malaria in endemic areasSzeless ThomasPerneger Thomas VRougemont André<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In populations where the prevalence of infection with <it>Plasmodium </it>parasites is high, blood tests that identify <it>Plasmodium </it>parasites in patients with fever may lead to false positive diagnosis of malaria-disease. We characterised the diminishing value of the parasite detection test as a function of the prevalence of infection.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We computed the ability of the parasite detection test to identify malaria at various levels of prevalence (0% to 90%), assuming plausible estimates of sensitivity (95% and 85%) and specificity (99% and 95%) for the detection of parasites. In each situation, we computed likelihood ratios of malaria (or absence of malaria) for positive and negative parasite detection tests. Likelihood ratios were classified as clinically useful (≥ 10), intermediate (5–10), or unhelpful (<5).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Likelihood ratios of positive tests were strongly related to the prevalence of infection in the general population: a positive test was unhelpful when the prevalence was 20% or more, and useful only when prevalence was 5% or less. The sensitivity and specificity of the test had little influence on these results. Likelihood ratios of negative tests were clinically useful when prevalence was 70% or less, but only for high levels of sensitivity (95%). If sensitivity was low (85%), the negative test was at best of intermediate utility, and was unhelpful if the prevalence of asymptomatic infection exceeded 30%.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Identification of <it>Plasmodium </it>parasites supports a diagnosis of malaria only in areas where the prevalence of <it>Plasmodium </it>infection is low. Wherever this prevalence exceeds about 20%, a positive test is clinically unhelpful.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/6/81
spellingShingle Szeless Thomas
Perneger Thomas V
Rougemont André
Utility of the detection of <it>Plasmodium </it>parasites for the diagnosis of malaria in endemic areas
BMC Infectious Diseases
title Utility of the detection of <it>Plasmodium </it>parasites for the diagnosis of malaria in endemic areas
title_full Utility of the detection of <it>Plasmodium </it>parasites for the diagnosis of malaria in endemic areas
title_fullStr Utility of the detection of <it>Plasmodium </it>parasites for the diagnosis of malaria in endemic areas
title_full_unstemmed Utility of the detection of <it>Plasmodium </it>parasites for the diagnosis of malaria in endemic areas
title_short Utility of the detection of <it>Plasmodium </it>parasites for the diagnosis of malaria in endemic areas
title_sort utility of the detection of it plasmodium it parasites for the diagnosis of malaria in endemic areas
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/6/81
work_keys_str_mv AT szelessthomas utilityofthedetectionofitplasmodiumitparasitesforthediagnosisofmalariainendemicareas
AT pernegerthomasv utilityofthedetectionofitplasmodiumitparasitesforthediagnosisofmalariainendemicareas
AT rougemontandre utilityofthedetectionofitplasmodiumitparasitesforthediagnosisofmalariainendemicareas