Insights into PCDD/Fs and PAHs in Biomass Boilers Envisaging Risks of Ash Use as Fertilizers

Since ashes are a possible source of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) contamination, their application in soils must be subject to more study and control. In this scope, feed residual forest biomasses and biomass ashes, collected along one year in four biomass power stations, were characterized...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helena Lopes, Susana Proença
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/14/4951
_version_ 1797562055195099136
author Helena Lopes
Susana Proença
author_facet Helena Lopes
Susana Proença
author_sort Helena Lopes
collection DOAJ
description Since ashes are a possible source of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) contamination, their application in soils must be subject to more study and control. In this scope, feed residual forest biomasses and biomass ashes, collected along one year in four biomass power stations, were characterized mainly for their polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) contents. The biomasses present concerning levels of Cl (0.04–0.28%) that may lead to PCDD/Fs formation. The biomasses also contain OCDD (29–260 ng/kg) and 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD (35 ng/kg) that may contribute to increased Toxic Equivalents (TEQs) of ashes, possibly involving dechlorination and ash enrichment mechanisms. While the WHO<sub>2005</sub>-TEQs in bottom ashes (14–20 ng TEQ/kg) reaches the proposed limit (20 ng TEQ/kg) for ash use as fertilizers, in fly ashes (35–1139 ng TEQ/kg) the limit is exceeded. PAHs are below 0.02 mg/kg in bottom ashes and 1.5–2.5 mg/kg in fly ashes, complying with the proposed limit of 6 mg/kg. As bottom and fly ash streams may contain different ash flows, a clear definition of ash mixes is required. Correlations between unburned carbon (C), PAHs and PCDD/Fs were not found, which highlights the need for compulsory PCDD/Fs analysis in ashes, independently of their origin, burnout degree or levels of other contaminants. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of handling non-detected values, which showed more impact for TEQs values close to the proposed regulatory limit of PCDD/Fs. These findings highlight the need to define reporting protocols of analytical results for risk assessments and conformity evaluation.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T18:24:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d37b9f3c084b4be1ab16baaa125258ec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T18:24:07Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-d37b9f3c084b4be1ab16baaa125258ec2023-11-20T07:12:32ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172020-07-011014495110.3390/app10144951Insights into PCDD/Fs and PAHs in Biomass Boilers Envisaging Risks of Ash Use as FertilizersHelena Lopes0Susana Proença1National Laboratory of Energy and Geology, Estrada Paço Lumiar, 22, Ed. G, 1649-038 Lisbon, PortugalInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, 3512 Utrecht, The NetherlandsSince ashes are a possible source of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) contamination, their application in soils must be subject to more study and control. In this scope, feed residual forest biomasses and biomass ashes, collected along one year in four biomass power stations, were characterized mainly for their polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) contents. The biomasses present concerning levels of Cl (0.04–0.28%) that may lead to PCDD/Fs formation. The biomasses also contain OCDD (29–260 ng/kg) and 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD (35 ng/kg) that may contribute to increased Toxic Equivalents (TEQs) of ashes, possibly involving dechlorination and ash enrichment mechanisms. While the WHO<sub>2005</sub>-TEQs in bottom ashes (14–20 ng TEQ/kg) reaches the proposed limit (20 ng TEQ/kg) for ash use as fertilizers, in fly ashes (35–1139 ng TEQ/kg) the limit is exceeded. PAHs are below 0.02 mg/kg in bottom ashes and 1.5–2.5 mg/kg in fly ashes, complying with the proposed limit of 6 mg/kg. As bottom and fly ash streams may contain different ash flows, a clear definition of ash mixes is required. Correlations between unburned carbon (C), PAHs and PCDD/Fs were not found, which highlights the need for compulsory PCDD/Fs analysis in ashes, independently of their origin, burnout degree or levels of other contaminants. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of handling non-detected values, which showed more impact for TEQs values close to the proposed regulatory limit of PCDD/Fs. These findings highlight the need to define reporting protocols of analytical results for risk assessments and conformity evaluation.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/14/4951residual forest biomasscombustionashfertilizersPCDD/FsPAHs
spellingShingle Helena Lopes
Susana Proença
Insights into PCDD/Fs and PAHs in Biomass Boilers Envisaging Risks of Ash Use as Fertilizers
Applied Sciences
residual forest biomass
combustion
ash
fertilizers
PCDD/Fs
PAHs
title Insights into PCDD/Fs and PAHs in Biomass Boilers Envisaging Risks of Ash Use as Fertilizers
title_full Insights into PCDD/Fs and PAHs in Biomass Boilers Envisaging Risks of Ash Use as Fertilizers
title_fullStr Insights into PCDD/Fs and PAHs in Biomass Boilers Envisaging Risks of Ash Use as Fertilizers
title_full_unstemmed Insights into PCDD/Fs and PAHs in Biomass Boilers Envisaging Risks of Ash Use as Fertilizers
title_short Insights into PCDD/Fs and PAHs in Biomass Boilers Envisaging Risks of Ash Use as Fertilizers
title_sort insights into pcdd fs and pahs in biomass boilers envisaging risks of ash use as fertilizers
topic residual forest biomass
combustion
ash
fertilizers
PCDD/Fs
PAHs
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/14/4951
work_keys_str_mv AT helenalopes insightsintopcddfsandpahsinbiomassboilersenvisagingrisksofashuseasfertilizers
AT susanaproenca insightsintopcddfsandpahsinbiomassboilersenvisagingrisksofashuseasfertilizers