2.2. Il nulla nulleggia ancora
Carnap (1932) famously attacked Heidegger for having constructed an insane metaphysics based on a misconception of both the logical form and the semantics of ordinary language. In what follows, it will be argued that, once one appropriately reads Heidegger’s famous dictum “the nothing nothings” in a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2012-04-01
|
| Series: | Rivista di Estetica |
| Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/1701 |
| _version_ | 1830407231529549824 |
|---|---|
| author | Alberto Voltolini |
| author_facet | Alberto Voltolini |
| author_sort | Alberto Voltolini |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Carnap (1932) famously attacked Heidegger for having constructed an insane metaphysics based on a misconception of both the logical form and the semantics of ordinary language. In what follows, it will be argued that, once one appropriately reads Heidegger’s famous dictum “the nothing nothings” in a Russellian fashion, there is nothing either logically or semantically wrong with it. The real controversy as to how that sentence has to be evaluated – not as to its meaning but as to its truth – lies at the metaphysico-ontological level. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-20T18:26:15Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d37e41817a0d4f8ea17efc1097bead3a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0035-6212 2421-5864 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-20T18:26:15Z |
| publishDate | 2012-04-01 |
| publisher | Rosenberg & Sellier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Rivista di Estetica |
| spelling | doaj.art-d37e41817a0d4f8ea17efc1097bead3a2022-12-21T19:30:09ZengRosenberg & SellierRivista di Estetica0035-62122421-58642012-04-01499911310.4000/estetica.17012.2. Il nulla nulleggia ancoraAlberto VoltoliniCarnap (1932) famously attacked Heidegger for having constructed an insane metaphysics based on a misconception of both the logical form and the semantics of ordinary language. In what follows, it will be argued that, once one appropriately reads Heidegger’s famous dictum “the nothing nothings” in a Russellian fashion, there is nothing either logically or semantically wrong with it. The real controversy as to how that sentence has to be evaluated – not as to its meaning but as to its truth – lies at the metaphysico-ontological level.http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/1701 |
| spellingShingle | Alberto Voltolini 2.2. Il nulla nulleggia ancora Rivista di Estetica |
| title | 2.2. Il nulla nulleggia ancora |
| title_full | 2.2. Il nulla nulleggia ancora |
| title_fullStr | 2.2. Il nulla nulleggia ancora |
| title_full_unstemmed | 2.2. Il nulla nulleggia ancora |
| title_short | 2.2. Il nulla nulleggia ancora |
| title_sort | 2 2 il nulla nulleggia ancora |
| url | http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/1701 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT albertovoltolini 22ilnullanulleggiaancora |