Perfusion index versus non-invasive hemodynamic parameters during insertion of i-gel, classic laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube
Background: Perfusion index (PI) is a non-invasive numerical value of peripheral perfusion obtained from a pulse oximeter. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of PI for detecting haemodynamic stress responses to insertion of i-gel, laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and endotracheal tube and compare,...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2013-01-01
|
Series: | Indian Journal of Anaesthesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2013;volume=57;issue=2;spage=156;epage=162;aulast=Atef |
_version_ | 1818962062775156736 |
---|---|
author | Hosam M Atef Salah Abd Fattah Mohammed Emad Abd Gaffer Ahamed Abd Al Rahman |
author_facet | Hosam M Atef Salah Abd Fattah Mohammed Emad Abd Gaffer Ahamed Abd Al Rahman |
author_sort | Hosam M Atef |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Perfusion index (PI) is a non-invasive numerical value of peripheral perfusion obtained from a pulse oximeter. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of PI for detecting haemodynamic stress responses to insertion of i-gel, laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and endotracheal tube and compare, its reliability with the conventional haemodynamic criteria in adults during general anaesthesia. Methods: Sixty patients scheduled for elective general surgery under general anaesthesia were randomised to three groups. (i-gel, LMA and ET groups ( n=20/group). Heart rate (HR) (positive if ≥10 bpm), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (positive if ≥15 mm Hg) and PI (positive if ≤10%) were monitored for 5 min after insertion. Main outcome measures: SBP, DBP, HR and PI were measured before induction of anaesthesia and before and after insertion of the airway device. Results: Insertion of airway devices produced significant increases in HR, SBP and DBP in LMA and ET groups. Moreover, PI was decreased significantly by 40%, 100% and 100% in the three groups. Using the PI criterion, the sensitivity was 100% (CI 82.4-100.0%). Regarding the SBP and DBP criterions, the sensitivity was 44.4% (CI 24.6-66.3%), 55.6% (CI 33.7-75.4%) respectively. Also, significant change in the mean PI over time (from pre-insertion value to the 1 st min, 3 rd min, until the 4 th min after insertion without regard the device type), ( P<0.001). Conclusion: PI is a reliable and easier alternative to conventional haemodynamic criteria for detection of stress response to insertion of i-gel, LMA and ET during propofol fentanyl isoflurane anaesthesia in adult patients. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T12:23:21Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d38704ffa5394963af99f8197e9b1770 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0019-5049 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T12:23:21Z |
publishDate | 2013-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Indian Journal of Anaesthesia |
spelling | doaj.art-d38704ffa5394963af99f8197e9b17702022-12-21T19:40:55ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Anaesthesia0019-50492013-01-0157215616210.4103/0019-5049.111843Perfusion index versus non-invasive hemodynamic parameters during insertion of i-gel, classic laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tubeHosam M AtefSalah Abd FattahMohammed Emad Abd GafferAhamed Abd Al RahmanBackground: Perfusion index (PI) is a non-invasive numerical value of peripheral perfusion obtained from a pulse oximeter. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of PI for detecting haemodynamic stress responses to insertion of i-gel, laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and endotracheal tube and compare, its reliability with the conventional haemodynamic criteria in adults during general anaesthesia. Methods: Sixty patients scheduled for elective general surgery under general anaesthesia were randomised to three groups. (i-gel, LMA and ET groups ( n=20/group). Heart rate (HR) (positive if ≥10 bpm), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (positive if ≥15 mm Hg) and PI (positive if ≤10%) were monitored for 5 min after insertion. Main outcome measures: SBP, DBP, HR and PI were measured before induction of anaesthesia and before and after insertion of the airway device. Results: Insertion of airway devices produced significant increases in HR, SBP and DBP in LMA and ET groups. Moreover, PI was decreased significantly by 40%, 100% and 100% in the three groups. Using the PI criterion, the sensitivity was 100% (CI 82.4-100.0%). Regarding the SBP and DBP criterions, the sensitivity was 44.4% (CI 24.6-66.3%), 55.6% (CI 33.7-75.4%) respectively. Also, significant change in the mean PI over time (from pre-insertion value to the 1 st min, 3 rd min, until the 4 th min after insertion without regard the device type), ( P<0.001). Conclusion: PI is a reliable and easier alternative to conventional haemodynamic criteria for detection of stress response to insertion of i-gel, LMA and ET during propofol fentanyl isoflurane anaesthesia in adult patients.http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2013;volume=57;issue=2;spage=156;epage=162;aulast=AtefAirway managementclassic laryngeal mask airwayendotracheal tubeequipment designi-gelintubationlaryngeal masksperfusion indexstress response |
spellingShingle | Hosam M Atef Salah Abd Fattah Mohammed Emad Abd Gaffer Ahamed Abd Al Rahman Perfusion index versus non-invasive hemodynamic parameters during insertion of i-gel, classic laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Airway management classic laryngeal mask airway endotracheal tube equipment design i-gel intubation laryngeal masks perfusion index stress response |
title | Perfusion index versus non-invasive hemodynamic parameters during insertion of i-gel, classic laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube |
title_full | Perfusion index versus non-invasive hemodynamic parameters during insertion of i-gel, classic laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube |
title_fullStr | Perfusion index versus non-invasive hemodynamic parameters during insertion of i-gel, classic laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube |
title_full_unstemmed | Perfusion index versus non-invasive hemodynamic parameters during insertion of i-gel, classic laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube |
title_short | Perfusion index versus non-invasive hemodynamic parameters during insertion of i-gel, classic laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube |
title_sort | perfusion index versus non invasive hemodynamic parameters during insertion of i gel classic laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube |
topic | Airway management classic laryngeal mask airway endotracheal tube equipment design i-gel intubation laryngeal masks perfusion index stress response |
url | http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2013;volume=57;issue=2;spage=156;epage=162;aulast=Atef |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hosammatef perfusionindexversusnoninvasivehemodynamicparametersduringinsertionofigelclassiclaryngealmaskairwayandendotrachealtube AT salahabdfattah perfusionindexversusnoninvasivehemodynamicparametersduringinsertionofigelclassiclaryngealmaskairwayandendotrachealtube AT mohammedemadabdgaffer perfusionindexversusnoninvasivehemodynamicparametersduringinsertionofigelclassiclaryngealmaskairwayandendotrachealtube AT ahamedabdalrahman perfusionindexversusnoninvasivehemodynamicparametersduringinsertionofigelclassiclaryngealmaskairwayandendotrachealtube |