Public reason and perfectionism: Comments on Quong’s liberalism without perfection
Liberalism Without Perfection elaborates a generally Rawlsian conception of public justification in order to defend antiperfectionist liberalism. This critical response raises questions about the link between the two parts of the project. On the hand, it is possible to reject that demand th...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Filozofija i Društvo |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2014/0353-57381401012L.pdf |
_version_ | 1818889660687974400 |
---|---|
author | Lister Andrew |
author_facet | Lister Andrew |
author_sort | Lister Andrew |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Liberalism Without Perfection elaborates a generally Rawlsian conception of
public justification in order to defend antiperfectionist liberalism. This
critical response raises questions about the link between the two parts of
the project. On the hand, it is possible to reject that demand that reasons
for political decisions pass a qualified acceptability requirement even if
one is strictly opposed to paternalism. On the other hand, the commitment to
public justifiability does not rule out all perfectionism, if there are some
claims about the good that are not reasonably rejectable. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-19T17:12:33Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d38ae414554a4a048f5bae8be35b06ae |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0353-5738 |
language | deu |
last_indexed | 2024-12-19T17:12:33Z |
publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
publisher | Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade |
record_format | Article |
series | Filozofija i Društvo |
spelling | doaj.art-d38ae414554a4a048f5bae8be35b06ae2022-12-21T20:12:58ZdeuInstitute for Philosophy and Social Theory, BelgradeFilozofija i Društvo0353-57382014-01-01251123410.2298/FID1401012L0353-57381401012LPublic reason and perfectionism: Comments on Quong’s liberalism without perfectionLister Andrew0Queens University, Department of Political Studies, Belfast, UKLiberalism Without Perfection elaborates a generally Rawlsian conception of public justification in order to defend antiperfectionist liberalism. This critical response raises questions about the link between the two parts of the project. On the hand, it is possible to reject that demand that reasons for political decisions pass a qualified acceptability requirement even if one is strictly opposed to paternalism. On the other hand, the commitment to public justifiability does not rule out all perfectionism, if there are some claims about the good that are not reasonably rejectable.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2014/0353-57381401012L.pdfliberalismpolitical liberalismpublic reasonpublic justificationneutralityperfectionism |
spellingShingle | Lister Andrew Public reason and perfectionism: Comments on Quong’s liberalism without perfection Filozofija i Društvo liberalism political liberalism public reason public justification neutrality perfectionism |
title | Public reason and perfectionism: Comments on Quong’s liberalism without perfection |
title_full | Public reason and perfectionism: Comments on Quong’s liberalism without perfection |
title_fullStr | Public reason and perfectionism: Comments on Quong’s liberalism without perfection |
title_full_unstemmed | Public reason and perfectionism: Comments on Quong’s liberalism without perfection |
title_short | Public reason and perfectionism: Comments on Quong’s liberalism without perfection |
title_sort | public reason and perfectionism comments on quong s liberalism without perfection |
topic | liberalism political liberalism public reason public justification neutrality perfectionism |
url | http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2014/0353-57381401012L.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT listerandrew publicreasonandperfectionismcommentsonquongsliberalismwithoutperfection |