Complications after Nonoperative Management of Hamate Fractures

Background:. Hamate fractures are an infrequent injury and are often missed or have a delayed diagnosis with potential for significant patient morbidity. There is a relative paucity in the literature involving large population studies of hamate fractures and subsequent complications. Gaining a bette...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Canhnghi N. Ta, BS, Zachary Finley, MD, Gleb A. Medvedev, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2022-05-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004352
_version_ 1818553532784050176
author Canhnghi N. Ta, BS
Zachary Finley, MD
Gleb A. Medvedev, MD
author_facet Canhnghi N. Ta, BS
Zachary Finley, MD
Gleb A. Medvedev, MD
author_sort Canhnghi N. Ta, BS
collection DOAJ
description Background:. Hamate fractures are an infrequent injury and are often missed or have a delayed diagnosis with potential for significant patient morbidity. There is a relative paucity in the literature involving large population studies of hamate fractures and subsequent complications. Gaining a better understanding of complications associated with nonoperative management will help guide the decision for operative intervention. Methods:. The PearlDiver patient records database was used to query for patients who sustained a hamate fracture using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Postinjury complications within 1 year of diagnosis were assessed using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for diagnoses of complications. Results:. A total of 1120 patients who sustained a hamate hook or body fracture met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the study. Patients who were managed nonoperatively showed a nonunion rate of 2%, ulnar neuropathy rate of 1.7%, and tendon rupture rate of 0.2%. In a subanalysis using only ICD-10 codes to distinguish between hook and body fractures, hook fractures demonstrated a nonunion rate of 2.2%, ulnar neuropathy rate of 2.7%, and tendon rupture rate of 0%, while body fractures had a nonunion rate of 1.2%, ulnar neuropathy rate of 1%, and tendon rupture rate of 0%. Conclusion:. The current study shows very low rates of nonunion, ulnar neuropathy and tendon rupture after nonoperative management of hamate fractures.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T09:27:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d38b48f02ffb472981fd4708971a7619
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2169-7574
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T09:27:01Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
spelling doaj.art-d38b48f02ffb472981fd4708971a76192022-12-22T00:29:00ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742022-05-01105e435210.1097/GOX.0000000000004352202205000-00055Complications after Nonoperative Management of Hamate FracturesCanhnghi N. Ta, BS0Zachary Finley, MD1Gleb A. Medvedev, MD2* From the Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, La.† Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, La.‡ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, La.Background:. Hamate fractures are an infrequent injury and are often missed or have a delayed diagnosis with potential for significant patient morbidity. There is a relative paucity in the literature involving large population studies of hamate fractures and subsequent complications. Gaining a better understanding of complications associated with nonoperative management will help guide the decision for operative intervention. Methods:. The PearlDiver patient records database was used to query for patients who sustained a hamate fracture using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Postinjury complications within 1 year of diagnosis were assessed using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for diagnoses of complications. Results:. A total of 1120 patients who sustained a hamate hook or body fracture met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the study. Patients who were managed nonoperatively showed a nonunion rate of 2%, ulnar neuropathy rate of 1.7%, and tendon rupture rate of 0.2%. In a subanalysis using only ICD-10 codes to distinguish between hook and body fractures, hook fractures demonstrated a nonunion rate of 2.2%, ulnar neuropathy rate of 2.7%, and tendon rupture rate of 0%, while body fractures had a nonunion rate of 1.2%, ulnar neuropathy rate of 1%, and tendon rupture rate of 0%. Conclusion:. The current study shows very low rates of nonunion, ulnar neuropathy and tendon rupture after nonoperative management of hamate fractures.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004352
spellingShingle Canhnghi N. Ta, BS
Zachary Finley, MD
Gleb A. Medvedev, MD
Complications after Nonoperative Management of Hamate Fractures
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
title Complications after Nonoperative Management of Hamate Fractures
title_full Complications after Nonoperative Management of Hamate Fractures
title_fullStr Complications after Nonoperative Management of Hamate Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Complications after Nonoperative Management of Hamate Fractures
title_short Complications after Nonoperative Management of Hamate Fractures
title_sort complications after nonoperative management of hamate fractures
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004352
work_keys_str_mv AT canhnghintabs complicationsafternonoperativemanagementofhamatefractures
AT zacharyfinleymd complicationsafternonoperativemanagementofhamatefractures
AT glebamedvedevmd complicationsafternonoperativemanagementofhamatefractures