Additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations.
The 3D orientation of clasts within a deposit are known to be informative on processes that formed that deposit. In archaeological sites, a portion of the clasts in the deposit are introduced by non-geological processes, and these are typically systematically recorded in archaeological excavations w...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5749765?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1819274585241026560 |
|---|---|
| author | Shannon P McPherron |
| author_facet | Shannon P McPherron |
| author_sort | Shannon P McPherron |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The 3D orientation of clasts within a deposit are known to be informative on processes that formed that deposit. In archaeological sites, a portion of the clasts in the deposit are introduced by non-geological processes, and these are typically systematically recorded in archaeological excavations with total stations. By recording a second point on elongated clasts it is possible to quickly and precisely capture their orientation. The statistical and graphical techniques for analyzing these data are well published, and there is a growing set of actualistic and archaeological comparative data to help with the interpretation of the documented patterns. This paper advances this area of research in presenting methods to address some shortcomings in current methodologies. First, a method for calculating confidence intervals on orientation statistics is presented to help address the question of how many objects are needed to assess the formation of a deposit based on orientations. Second, a method for assessing the probability that two assemblages have different orientations is presented based on permutations testing. This method differs from existing ones in that it considers three-dimensional orientations rather than working separately with the two-dimensional bearing and plunge components. Third, a method is presented to examine spatial variability in orientations based on a moving windows approach. The raw data plus the R code to build this document and to implement these methods plus those already described by McPherron are included to help further their use in assessing archaeological site formation processes. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-23T23:10:46Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d3937369075c4ec3801d577c9113f857 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-23T23:10:46Z |
| publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-d3937369075c4ec3801d577c9113f8572022-12-21T17:26:41ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01131e019019510.1371/journal.pone.0190195Additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations.Shannon P McPherronThe 3D orientation of clasts within a deposit are known to be informative on processes that formed that deposit. In archaeological sites, a portion of the clasts in the deposit are introduced by non-geological processes, and these are typically systematically recorded in archaeological excavations with total stations. By recording a second point on elongated clasts it is possible to quickly and precisely capture their orientation. The statistical and graphical techniques for analyzing these data are well published, and there is a growing set of actualistic and archaeological comparative data to help with the interpretation of the documented patterns. This paper advances this area of research in presenting methods to address some shortcomings in current methodologies. First, a method for calculating confidence intervals on orientation statistics is presented to help address the question of how many objects are needed to assess the formation of a deposit based on orientations. Second, a method for assessing the probability that two assemblages have different orientations is presented based on permutations testing. This method differs from existing ones in that it considers three-dimensional orientations rather than working separately with the two-dimensional bearing and plunge components. Third, a method is presented to examine spatial variability in orientations based on a moving windows approach. The raw data plus the R code to build this document and to implement these methods plus those already described by McPherron are included to help further their use in assessing archaeological site formation processes.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5749765?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Shannon P McPherron Additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations. PLoS ONE |
| title | Additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations. |
| title_full | Additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations. |
| title_fullStr | Additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations. |
| title_short | Additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations. |
| title_sort | additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5749765?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT shannonpmcpherron additionalstatisticalandgraphicalmethodsforanalyzingsiteformationprocessesusingartifactorientations |