Effects of irrigation scheduling approaches on soil moisture and vegetable production in the Northeastern U.S.A.

The Northeast United States is a temperate region that has historically experienced even rainfall distribution across the agricultural growing season. Due to climate change, seasonal precipitation and temperature dynamics are shifting, causing many farmers to rethink their approach to irrigation. So...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachel E. Schattman, Haley Jean, Joshua W. Faulkner, Rebecca Maden, Lisa McKeag, Katie Campbell Nelson, Vernon Grubinger, Stephanie Burnett, M. Susan Erich, Tsutomu Ohno
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-09-01
Series:Agricultural Water Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423002937
_version_ 1827868466128879616
author Rachel E. Schattman
Haley Jean
Joshua W. Faulkner
Rebecca Maden
Lisa McKeag
Katie Campbell Nelson
Vernon Grubinger
Stephanie Burnett
M. Susan Erich
Tsutomu Ohno
author_facet Rachel E. Schattman
Haley Jean
Joshua W. Faulkner
Rebecca Maden
Lisa McKeag
Katie Campbell Nelson
Vernon Grubinger
Stephanie Burnett
M. Susan Erich
Tsutomu Ohno
author_sort Rachel E. Schattman
collection DOAJ
description The Northeast United States is a temperate region that has historically experienced even rainfall distribution across the agricultural growing season. Due to climate change, seasonal precipitation and temperature dynamics are shifting, causing many farmers to rethink their approach to irrigation. Soil-water sensing technology, including tensiometers and granular matrix sensors, are often used by farmers to increase water use efficiency. However, adoption of these technologies is low in the Northeast. We conducted a field study to assess the potential of soil-water sensing hardware and software to improve crop outcomes in temperate agricultural regions such as the Northeast, and a survey to better understand farmer preferences for using soil moisture sensors and associated data. The survey involved two vegetable farmer industry associations, and focus groups at four agricultural conferences. We found a diversity of preferences among farmers when it comes to when and how they would like to access soil-water data. The cost of cloud-based data collection and storage is a barrier for some farmers, and they question the economic benefits of investing in these platforms. Additionally, we conducted field experiments in two locations across two growing seasons to investigate how using three irrigation strategies (feeling the soil, granular matrix sensors, and timers) affect soil-water conditions, leaching, and crop yield and quality. We found no significant effects of irrigation strategy on yield, though our results suggest other advantages in using soil moisture sensors. For example, the use of sensors increased the proportion of days during the growing season in which soil-water was in the optimal field capacity category. Therefore, using these sensors will reduce potential environmental risk associated with N contamination of groundwater.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:31:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d3ab45723b3846d68aa9c373d20c0fa7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1873-2283
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:31:53Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Agricultural Water Management
spelling doaj.art-d3ab45723b3846d68aa9c373d20c0fa72023-08-10T04:33:36ZengElsevierAgricultural Water Management1873-22832023-09-01287108428Effects of irrigation scheduling approaches on soil moisture and vegetable production in the Northeastern U.S.A.Rachel E. Schattman0Haley Jean1Joshua W. Faulkner2Rebecca Maden3Lisa McKeag4Katie Campbell Nelson5Vernon Grubinger6Stephanie Burnett7M. Susan Erich8Tsutomu Ohno9University of Maine School of Food and Agriculture, 5722 Deering Hall, Orono, ME 04469, USA; Corresponding author.University of Maine School of Food and Agriculture, 5722 Deering Hall, Orono, ME 04469, USAUniversity of Vermont Extension, 63 Carrigan Dr., Burlington, VT 05405, USAUniversity of Vermont Extension, 423 Pond Ln #300, Middlebury, VT 05753, USAUniversity of Massachusetts Extension, French Hall, 230 Stockbridge Rd., Amherst, MA 01003, USACornell Cooperative Extension, Columbia & Greene Counties, Agroforestry Resource Center, 6055 Route 23, Acra, NY 12405, USAUniversity of Vermont Extension, 130 Austine Dr #300, Brattleboro, VT 05301, USAUniversity of Maine School of Food and Agriculture, 5722 Deering Hall, Orono, ME 04469, USAUniversity of Maine School of Food and Agriculture, 5722 Deering Hall, Orono, ME 04469, USAUniversity of Maine School of Food and Agriculture, 5722 Deering Hall, Orono, ME 04469, USAThe Northeast United States is a temperate region that has historically experienced even rainfall distribution across the agricultural growing season. Due to climate change, seasonal precipitation and temperature dynamics are shifting, causing many farmers to rethink their approach to irrigation. Soil-water sensing technology, including tensiometers and granular matrix sensors, are often used by farmers to increase water use efficiency. However, adoption of these technologies is low in the Northeast. We conducted a field study to assess the potential of soil-water sensing hardware and software to improve crop outcomes in temperate agricultural regions such as the Northeast, and a survey to better understand farmer preferences for using soil moisture sensors and associated data. The survey involved two vegetable farmer industry associations, and focus groups at four agricultural conferences. We found a diversity of preferences among farmers when it comes to when and how they would like to access soil-water data. The cost of cloud-based data collection and storage is a barrier for some farmers, and they question the economic benefits of investing in these platforms. Additionally, we conducted field experiments in two locations across two growing seasons to investigate how using three irrigation strategies (feeling the soil, granular matrix sensors, and timers) affect soil-water conditions, leaching, and crop yield and quality. We found no significant effects of irrigation strategy on yield, though our results suggest other advantages in using soil moisture sensors. For example, the use of sensors increased the proportion of days during the growing season in which soil-water was in the optimal field capacity category. Therefore, using these sensors will reduce potential environmental risk associated with N contamination of groundwater.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423002937Climate changeDecision makingIrrigationNitrate leachingVegetable productionWater use efficiency
spellingShingle Rachel E. Schattman
Haley Jean
Joshua W. Faulkner
Rebecca Maden
Lisa McKeag
Katie Campbell Nelson
Vernon Grubinger
Stephanie Burnett
M. Susan Erich
Tsutomu Ohno
Effects of irrigation scheduling approaches on soil moisture and vegetable production in the Northeastern U.S.A.
Agricultural Water Management
Climate change
Decision making
Irrigation
Nitrate leaching
Vegetable production
Water use efficiency
title Effects of irrigation scheduling approaches on soil moisture and vegetable production in the Northeastern U.S.A.
title_full Effects of irrigation scheduling approaches on soil moisture and vegetable production in the Northeastern U.S.A.
title_fullStr Effects of irrigation scheduling approaches on soil moisture and vegetable production in the Northeastern U.S.A.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of irrigation scheduling approaches on soil moisture and vegetable production in the Northeastern U.S.A.
title_short Effects of irrigation scheduling approaches on soil moisture and vegetable production in the Northeastern U.S.A.
title_sort effects of irrigation scheduling approaches on soil moisture and vegetable production in the northeastern u s a
topic Climate change
Decision making
Irrigation
Nitrate leaching
Vegetable production
Water use efficiency
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423002937
work_keys_str_mv AT racheleschattman effectsofirrigationschedulingapproachesonsoilmoistureandvegetableproductioninthenortheasternusa
AT haleyjean effectsofirrigationschedulingapproachesonsoilmoistureandvegetableproductioninthenortheasternusa
AT joshuawfaulkner effectsofirrigationschedulingapproachesonsoilmoistureandvegetableproductioninthenortheasternusa
AT rebeccamaden effectsofirrigationschedulingapproachesonsoilmoistureandvegetableproductioninthenortheasternusa
AT lisamckeag effectsofirrigationschedulingapproachesonsoilmoistureandvegetableproductioninthenortheasternusa
AT katiecampbellnelson effectsofirrigationschedulingapproachesonsoilmoistureandvegetableproductioninthenortheasternusa
AT vernongrubinger effectsofirrigationschedulingapproachesonsoilmoistureandvegetableproductioninthenortheasternusa
AT stephanieburnett effectsofirrigationschedulingapproachesonsoilmoistureandvegetableproductioninthenortheasternusa
AT msusanerich effectsofirrigationschedulingapproachesonsoilmoistureandvegetableproductioninthenortheasternusa
AT tsutomuohno effectsofirrigationschedulingapproachesonsoilmoistureandvegetableproductioninthenortheasternusa