Embedded Implicatures? Remarks on the debate between globalist and localist theories

Geurts & Pouscoulous (2009) present experimental evidence that embedded implicatures are not systematically available and conclude that localist theories of implicatures cannot be maintained. I argue that this conclusion can be strengthened by showing that their findings cannot be reconciled wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michela Ippolito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Linguistic Society of America 2010-03-01
Series:Semantics and Pragmatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://semprag.org/article/view/665
_version_ 1819040709524586496
author Michela Ippolito
author_facet Michela Ippolito
author_sort Michela Ippolito
collection DOAJ
description Geurts & Pouscoulous (2009) present experimental evidence that embedded implicatures are not systematically available and conclude that localist theories of implicatures cannot be maintained. I argue that this conclusion can be strengthened by showing that their findings cannot be reconciled with a localist theory even when the latter is supplemented with a formal way to predict when an embedded implicature will be preferred, as suggested in Chierchia, Fox & Spector (2008). doi:10.3765/sp.3.5 <a href="http://semantics-online.org/sp-bib/ippolito10.bib">BibTeX info</a>
first_indexed 2024-12-21T09:13:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d3af2d3497a94a7991754e644bca5c70
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1937-8912
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T09:13:25Z
publishDate 2010-03-01
publisher Linguistic Society of America
record_format Article
series Semantics and Pragmatics
spelling doaj.art-d3af2d3497a94a7991754e644bca5c702022-12-21T19:09:12ZengLinguistic Society of AmericaSemantics and Pragmatics1937-89122010-03-013011510.3765/sp.3.5503Embedded Implicatures? Remarks on the debate between globalist and localist theoriesMichela Ippolito0University of TorontoGeurts & Pouscoulous (2009) present experimental evidence that embedded implicatures are not systematically available and conclude that localist theories of implicatures cannot be maintained. I argue that this conclusion can be strengthened by showing that their findings cannot be reconciled with a localist theory even when the latter is supplemented with a formal way to predict when an embedded implicature will be preferred, as suggested in Chierchia, Fox & Spector (2008). doi:10.3765/sp.3.5 <a href="http://semantics-online.org/sp-bib/ippolito10.bib">BibTeX info</a>http://semprag.org/article/view/665implicature
spellingShingle Michela Ippolito
Embedded Implicatures? Remarks on the debate between globalist and localist theories
Semantics and Pragmatics
implicature
title Embedded Implicatures? Remarks on the debate between globalist and localist theories
title_full Embedded Implicatures? Remarks on the debate between globalist and localist theories
title_fullStr Embedded Implicatures? Remarks on the debate between globalist and localist theories
title_full_unstemmed Embedded Implicatures? Remarks on the debate between globalist and localist theories
title_short Embedded Implicatures? Remarks on the debate between globalist and localist theories
title_sort embedded implicatures remarks on the debate between globalist and localist theories
topic implicature
url http://semprag.org/article/view/665
work_keys_str_mv AT michelaippolito embeddedimplicaturesremarksonthedebatebetweenglobalistandlocalisttheories