The impact of surgical guide design and bone quality on heat generation during pilot implant site preparation: an in vitro study

Abstract Background Surgical guides restrict the flow of cooling agent to osteotomy site, which will lead to a temperature rise that provokes tissue injury. Few studies compared differences in the temperature changes between non-limiting ‘conventional’ and limiting ‘guided’ surgical guides during im...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eman Abuhajar, Nesreen A. Salim, Malik Sallam, Fadi Jarab, Julian D. Satterthwaite
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-05-01
Series:BMC Oral Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02961-9
_version_ 1827947942361694208
author Eman Abuhajar
Nesreen A. Salim
Malik Sallam
Fadi Jarab
Julian D. Satterthwaite
author_facet Eman Abuhajar
Nesreen A. Salim
Malik Sallam
Fadi Jarab
Julian D. Satterthwaite
author_sort Eman Abuhajar
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Surgical guides restrict the flow of cooling agent to osteotomy site, which will lead to a temperature rise that provokes tissue injury. Few studies compared differences in the temperature changes between non-limiting ‘conventional’ and limiting ‘guided’ surgical guides during implant site preparation. The objective of this study was to investigate the difference in temperature changes during bone drilling for implant placement using non-limiting and limiting surgical guides at cortical and cancellous bone levels. Methods Forty-four bovine rib samples were used for implant bed preparation in this study with a minimum thickness of 11 mm was chosen for the ribs. The bone was stored in a freezer at 10 °C until it was used. On the day of the study, the bone was defrosted and soaked in water at 21 °C for three hours before embarking on drilling to make sure each sample was at the same temperature when tested. Forty-four bone specimens were prepared and randomly allocated to receive either a limiting or a non-limiting surgical guides (22 for each group). The osteotomy site was prepared by one operator following the manufacturer’s instructions, using limiting and non-limiting surgical guides. Temperature changes were recorded during implant bed preparation using thermocouples that fit into 7 mm-horizontal channels at two different depths (Coronally) and (Apically) at 1 mm distance from the osteotomy site. The data were tested for homogeneity of variances using Levene’s test, then data were analyzed using an Independent sample t-test and the significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05. Results The mean temperature rise for all samples was 0.55 °C. The mean temperature rises for the limiting and non-limiting surgical guides were 0.80 °C and 0.33 °C respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in temperature rise between the limiting and non-limiting surgical guides (P = 0.008). In relation to position of temperature recording (coronal vs. apical), there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). No significant difference was noted between the two groups at cancellous bone level (P = 0.68), but the difference was significant at cortical bone level (P = 0.036). Conclusion Limiting surgical guides showed higher readings than non-limiting. However, for both techniques, temperature rise was not significant clinically and within a safe range.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T12:46:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d3b65f9411c64e86ae54f7f4a445504e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6831
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T12:46:40Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Oral Health
spelling doaj.art-d3b65f9411c64e86ae54f7f4a445504e2023-05-14T11:29:54ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312023-05-012311910.1186/s12903-023-02961-9The impact of surgical guide design and bone quality on heat generation during pilot implant site preparation: an in vitro studyEman Abuhajar0Nesreen A. Salim1Malik Sallam2Fadi Jarab3Julian D. Satterthwaite4Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Honorary position at Tripoli University, University of TripoliProsthodontic department, School of Dentistry, consultant in fixed and removable prosthodontics, The University of Jordan, Jordan University HospitalDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of JordanDepartment of Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Science and TechnologyRestorative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, University of ManchesterAbstract Background Surgical guides restrict the flow of cooling agent to osteotomy site, which will lead to a temperature rise that provokes tissue injury. Few studies compared differences in the temperature changes between non-limiting ‘conventional’ and limiting ‘guided’ surgical guides during implant site preparation. The objective of this study was to investigate the difference in temperature changes during bone drilling for implant placement using non-limiting and limiting surgical guides at cortical and cancellous bone levels. Methods Forty-four bovine rib samples were used for implant bed preparation in this study with a minimum thickness of 11 mm was chosen for the ribs. The bone was stored in a freezer at 10 °C until it was used. On the day of the study, the bone was defrosted and soaked in water at 21 °C for three hours before embarking on drilling to make sure each sample was at the same temperature when tested. Forty-four bone specimens were prepared and randomly allocated to receive either a limiting or a non-limiting surgical guides (22 for each group). The osteotomy site was prepared by one operator following the manufacturer’s instructions, using limiting and non-limiting surgical guides. Temperature changes were recorded during implant bed preparation using thermocouples that fit into 7 mm-horizontal channels at two different depths (Coronally) and (Apically) at 1 mm distance from the osteotomy site. The data were tested for homogeneity of variances using Levene’s test, then data were analyzed using an Independent sample t-test and the significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05. Results The mean temperature rise for all samples was 0.55 °C. The mean temperature rises for the limiting and non-limiting surgical guides were 0.80 °C and 0.33 °C respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in temperature rise between the limiting and non-limiting surgical guides (P = 0.008). In relation to position of temperature recording (coronal vs. apical), there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). No significant difference was noted between the two groups at cancellous bone level (P = 0.68), but the difference was significant at cortical bone level (P = 0.036). Conclusion Limiting surgical guides showed higher readings than non-limiting. However, for both techniques, temperature rise was not significant clinically and within a safe range.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02961-9Dental implantsOsteotomyNon-limiting templateGuided templateSurgical guidesTemperature elevation
spellingShingle Eman Abuhajar
Nesreen A. Salim
Malik Sallam
Fadi Jarab
Julian D. Satterthwaite
The impact of surgical guide design and bone quality on heat generation during pilot implant site preparation: an in vitro study
BMC Oral Health
Dental implants
Osteotomy
Non-limiting template
Guided template
Surgical guides
Temperature elevation
title The impact of surgical guide design and bone quality on heat generation during pilot implant site preparation: an in vitro study
title_full The impact of surgical guide design and bone quality on heat generation during pilot implant site preparation: an in vitro study
title_fullStr The impact of surgical guide design and bone quality on heat generation during pilot implant site preparation: an in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed The impact of surgical guide design and bone quality on heat generation during pilot implant site preparation: an in vitro study
title_short The impact of surgical guide design and bone quality on heat generation during pilot implant site preparation: an in vitro study
title_sort impact of surgical guide design and bone quality on heat generation during pilot implant site preparation an in vitro study
topic Dental implants
Osteotomy
Non-limiting template
Guided template
Surgical guides
Temperature elevation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02961-9
work_keys_str_mv AT emanabuhajar theimpactofsurgicalguidedesignandbonequalityonheatgenerationduringpilotimplantsitepreparationaninvitrostudy
AT nesreenasalim theimpactofsurgicalguidedesignandbonequalityonheatgenerationduringpilotimplantsitepreparationaninvitrostudy
AT maliksallam theimpactofsurgicalguidedesignandbonequalityonheatgenerationduringpilotimplantsitepreparationaninvitrostudy
AT fadijarab theimpactofsurgicalguidedesignandbonequalityonheatgenerationduringpilotimplantsitepreparationaninvitrostudy
AT juliandsatterthwaite theimpactofsurgicalguidedesignandbonequalityonheatgenerationduringpilotimplantsitepreparationaninvitrostudy
AT emanabuhajar impactofsurgicalguidedesignandbonequalityonheatgenerationduringpilotimplantsitepreparationaninvitrostudy
AT nesreenasalim impactofsurgicalguidedesignandbonequalityonheatgenerationduringpilotimplantsitepreparationaninvitrostudy
AT maliksallam impactofsurgicalguidedesignandbonequalityonheatgenerationduringpilotimplantsitepreparationaninvitrostudy
AT fadijarab impactofsurgicalguidedesignandbonequalityonheatgenerationduringpilotimplantsitepreparationaninvitrostudy
AT juliandsatterthwaite impactofsurgicalguidedesignandbonequalityonheatgenerationduringpilotimplantsitepreparationaninvitrostudy