The regulatory effects of biotic and abiotic factors on soil respiration under different land-use types

Assessing the impacts of land use on soil respiration (Rs) and its temperature sensitivity (Q10) is of vital significance for understanding regional carbon cycles. In this study, the regulation of Rs and Q10 by soil biotic and abiotic factors under different land-use types, i.e., cropland, apple orc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H.B. Xiao, Z.H. Shi, Z.W. Li, J. Chen, B. Huang, Z.J. Yue, Y.M. Zhan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-08-01
Series:Ecological Indicators
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21004520
_version_ 1818742259790643200
author H.B. Xiao
Z.H. Shi
Z.W. Li
J. Chen
B. Huang
Z.J. Yue
Y.M. Zhan
author_facet H.B. Xiao
Z.H. Shi
Z.W. Li
J. Chen
B. Huang
Z.J. Yue
Y.M. Zhan
author_sort H.B. Xiao
collection DOAJ
description Assessing the impacts of land use on soil respiration (Rs) and its temperature sensitivity (Q10) is of vital significance for understanding regional carbon cycles. In this study, the regulation of Rs and Q10 by soil biotic and abiotic factors under different land-use types, i.e., cropland, apple orchard, abandoned land, Coronilla varia grassland, and Robinia pseudoacacia woodland, were examined in the Luoyugou watershed on the Chinese Loess Plateau. We monitored Rs, soil temperature, and moisture in situ from July to December 2018 and evaluated soil microbial abundance, root biomass, carbon and nitrogen nutrient levels. The results showed that soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, available nitrogen, dissolved organic carbon, and microbial biomass carbon decreased by the following order: grassland > woodland > abandoned land > cropland > orchard. The high amounts of plant residues and the low levels of human disturbance in grassland and woodland contributed to higher soil carbon and nitrogen nutrient levels in these land-use types than in cropland and orchard. Rs decreased from July to December, with soil temperature and moisture being the key explanatory factors. The mean Rs in grassland (3.68 μmol m−2 s−1) and woodland (3.81 μmol m−2 s−1) was significantly higher than that in cropland, orchard, and abandoned land. Q10 ranged from 1.77 to 5.87 across all land-use types, and orchard, abandoned land, grassland, and woodland had Q10 values 1.91, 1.37, 1.47, and 3.32 times higher, respectively, than the Q10 of cropland. The variable importance in the projection (VIP) values from the partial least squares regression model showed that soil temperature (VIP = 1.41), pH (VIP = 1.22), microbial biomass nitrogen (VIP = 1.13), microbial biomass carbon (VIP = 1.12), bacterial abundance (VIP = 1.12), available nitrogen (VIP = 1.01), and soil moisture (VIP = 1.01) were the most important predictors of Rs. Our study suggests that soil temperature and labile organic matter exert stronger impacts on Rs than do microbial abundance and root biomass. Our results contribute to a better understanding of ecosystem carbon cycles.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T02:09:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d3c45d867ca942f6b9d505cdcccc6896
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1470-160X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T02:09:41Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Ecological Indicators
spelling doaj.art-d3c45d867ca942f6b9d505cdcccc68962022-12-21T21:24:31ZengElsevierEcological Indicators1470-160X2021-08-01127107787The regulatory effects of biotic and abiotic factors on soil respiration under different land-use typesH.B. Xiao0Z.H. Shi1Z.W. Li2J. Chen3B. Huang4Z.J. Yue5Y.M. Zhan6College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, PR ChinaCollege of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, PR China; CAS Center for Excellence in Quaternary Science and Global Change, Xi'an 710061, China; Corresponding authors.College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410082, PR China; Corresponding authors.State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation CAS and MWR, Yangling 712100, PR ChinaGuangdong Key Laboratory of Integrated Agro-environmental Pollution Control and Management, Guangdong Institute of Eco-environmental Science & Technology, Guangzhou 510650, PR ChinaGuangdong Key Laboratory of Integrated Agro-environmental Pollution Control and Management, Guangdong Institute of Eco-environmental Science & Technology, Guangzhou 510650, PR ChinaCollege of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, PR ChinaAssessing the impacts of land use on soil respiration (Rs) and its temperature sensitivity (Q10) is of vital significance for understanding regional carbon cycles. In this study, the regulation of Rs and Q10 by soil biotic and abiotic factors under different land-use types, i.e., cropland, apple orchard, abandoned land, Coronilla varia grassland, and Robinia pseudoacacia woodland, were examined in the Luoyugou watershed on the Chinese Loess Plateau. We monitored Rs, soil temperature, and moisture in situ from July to December 2018 and evaluated soil microbial abundance, root biomass, carbon and nitrogen nutrient levels. The results showed that soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, available nitrogen, dissolved organic carbon, and microbial biomass carbon decreased by the following order: grassland > woodland > abandoned land > cropland > orchard. The high amounts of plant residues and the low levels of human disturbance in grassland and woodland contributed to higher soil carbon and nitrogen nutrient levels in these land-use types than in cropland and orchard. Rs decreased from July to December, with soil temperature and moisture being the key explanatory factors. The mean Rs in grassland (3.68 μmol m−2 s−1) and woodland (3.81 μmol m−2 s−1) was significantly higher than that in cropland, orchard, and abandoned land. Q10 ranged from 1.77 to 5.87 across all land-use types, and orchard, abandoned land, grassland, and woodland had Q10 values 1.91, 1.37, 1.47, and 3.32 times higher, respectively, than the Q10 of cropland. The variable importance in the projection (VIP) values from the partial least squares regression model showed that soil temperature (VIP = 1.41), pH (VIP = 1.22), microbial biomass nitrogen (VIP = 1.13), microbial biomass carbon (VIP = 1.12), bacterial abundance (VIP = 1.12), available nitrogen (VIP = 1.01), and soil moisture (VIP = 1.01) were the most important predictors of Rs. Our study suggests that soil temperature and labile organic matter exert stronger impacts on Rs than do microbial abundance and root biomass. Our results contribute to a better understanding of ecosystem carbon cycles.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21004520Land useSoil respirationTemperature sensitivitySoil organic carbonMicrobial abundance
spellingShingle H.B. Xiao
Z.H. Shi
Z.W. Li
J. Chen
B. Huang
Z.J. Yue
Y.M. Zhan
The regulatory effects of biotic and abiotic factors on soil respiration under different land-use types
Ecological Indicators
Land use
Soil respiration
Temperature sensitivity
Soil organic carbon
Microbial abundance
title The regulatory effects of biotic and abiotic factors on soil respiration under different land-use types
title_full The regulatory effects of biotic and abiotic factors on soil respiration under different land-use types
title_fullStr The regulatory effects of biotic and abiotic factors on soil respiration under different land-use types
title_full_unstemmed The regulatory effects of biotic and abiotic factors on soil respiration under different land-use types
title_short The regulatory effects of biotic and abiotic factors on soil respiration under different land-use types
title_sort regulatory effects of biotic and abiotic factors on soil respiration under different land use types
topic Land use
Soil respiration
Temperature sensitivity
Soil organic carbon
Microbial abundance
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21004520
work_keys_str_mv AT hbxiao theregulatoryeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsonsoilrespirationunderdifferentlandusetypes
AT zhshi theregulatoryeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsonsoilrespirationunderdifferentlandusetypes
AT zwli theregulatoryeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsonsoilrespirationunderdifferentlandusetypes
AT jchen theregulatoryeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsonsoilrespirationunderdifferentlandusetypes
AT bhuang theregulatoryeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsonsoilrespirationunderdifferentlandusetypes
AT zjyue theregulatoryeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsonsoilrespirationunderdifferentlandusetypes
AT ymzhan theregulatoryeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsonsoilrespirationunderdifferentlandusetypes
AT hbxiao regulatoryeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsonsoilrespirationunderdifferentlandusetypes
AT zhshi regulatoryeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsonsoilrespirationunderdifferentlandusetypes
AT zwli regulatoryeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsonsoilrespirationunderdifferentlandusetypes
AT jchen regulatoryeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsonsoilrespirationunderdifferentlandusetypes
AT bhuang regulatoryeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsonsoilrespirationunderdifferentlandusetypes
AT zjyue regulatoryeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsonsoilrespirationunderdifferentlandusetypes
AT ymzhan regulatoryeffectsofbioticandabioticfactorsonsoilrespirationunderdifferentlandusetypes