The Battle between the Correct and Mirror Writings of a Digit in Children’s Recognition Memory

Recent research into character reversals in writings produced by occidental children has shown that they mainly reverse the left-oriented digits (1, 2, 3, 7, and 9) and therefore appear to apply a right-orienting rule. But do they produce similar reversal errors when asked to recognize the digits? I...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jean-Paul Fischer, Christophe Luxembourger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/10/7/183
_version_ 1797562216446164992
author Jean-Paul Fischer
Christophe Luxembourger
author_facet Jean-Paul Fischer
Christophe Luxembourger
author_sort Jean-Paul Fischer
collection DOAJ
description Recent research into character reversals in writings produced by occidental children has shown that they mainly reverse the left-oriented digits (1, 2, 3, 7, and 9) and therefore appear to apply a right-orienting rule. But do they produce similar reversal errors when asked to recognize the digits? In an experiment, based on eye-tracking observations of 50 children (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 5.4 years), children had to point towards a target digit in a 2 × 2 matrix also containing three distractor digits, one of which was the mirror-reversed writing of the correctly written target digit. This recognition task led to a true “battle” in children’s memory between the two writings of the target digit. This battle is shown in the graphical abstract that represents a heat map from a sub-sample of children (on the left side) and the fixation points map from an individual child (on the right side). Rather than following the predicted right-orienting rule, the children’s responses appeared to be biased towards digits in the right-hand column of the 2 × 2 matrices (when the reversed target digit was not in the same column as the correctly written target digit). As a whole, these findings support the hypotheses that many 4- to 6-year-old’s representations of the digit writings are unoriented in their memory and that these children may adopt different solutions to overcome this lack of orientation depending on whether they write or read.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T18:25:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d3cd69960e674e02b6e8093033019e6f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7102
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T18:25:06Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Education Sciences
spelling doaj.art-d3cd69960e674e02b6e8093033019e6f2023-11-20T07:04:15ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022020-07-0110718310.3390/educsci10070183The Battle between the Correct and Mirror Writings of a Digit in Children’s Recognition MemoryJean-Paul Fischer0Christophe Luxembourger1Laboratory 2LPN, University Lorraine, 54021 Nancy, FranceDepartment of Psychology, Laboratory 2LPN, University Lorraine, 54021 Nancy, FranceRecent research into character reversals in writings produced by occidental children has shown that they mainly reverse the left-oriented digits (1, 2, 3, 7, and 9) and therefore appear to apply a right-orienting rule. But do they produce similar reversal errors when asked to recognize the digits? In an experiment, based on eye-tracking observations of 50 children (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 5.4 years), children had to point towards a target digit in a 2 × 2 matrix also containing three distractor digits, one of which was the mirror-reversed writing of the correctly written target digit. This recognition task led to a true “battle” in children’s memory between the two writings of the target digit. This battle is shown in the graphical abstract that represents a heat map from a sub-sample of children (on the left side) and the fixation points map from an individual child (on the right side). Rather than following the predicted right-orienting rule, the children’s responses appeared to be biased towards digits in the right-hand column of the 2 × 2 matrices (when the reversed target digit was not in the same column as the correctly written target digit). As a whole, these findings support the hypotheses that many 4- to 6-year-old’s representations of the digit writings are unoriented in their memory and that these children may adopt different solutions to overcome this lack of orientation depending on whether they write or read.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/10/7/183mirror generalizationrecognition memorymirror writingdigit reversaleye-tracking
spellingShingle Jean-Paul Fischer
Christophe Luxembourger
The Battle between the Correct and Mirror Writings of a Digit in Children’s Recognition Memory
Education Sciences
mirror generalization
recognition memory
mirror writing
digit reversal
eye-tracking
title The Battle between the Correct and Mirror Writings of a Digit in Children’s Recognition Memory
title_full The Battle between the Correct and Mirror Writings of a Digit in Children’s Recognition Memory
title_fullStr The Battle between the Correct and Mirror Writings of a Digit in Children’s Recognition Memory
title_full_unstemmed The Battle between the Correct and Mirror Writings of a Digit in Children’s Recognition Memory
title_short The Battle between the Correct and Mirror Writings of a Digit in Children’s Recognition Memory
title_sort battle between the correct and mirror writings of a digit in children s recognition memory
topic mirror generalization
recognition memory
mirror writing
digit reversal
eye-tracking
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/10/7/183
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanpaulfischer thebattlebetweenthecorrectandmirrorwritingsofadigitinchildrensrecognitionmemory
AT christopheluxembourger thebattlebetweenthecorrectandmirrorwritingsofadigitinchildrensrecognitionmemory
AT jeanpaulfischer battlebetweenthecorrectandmirrorwritingsofadigitinchildrensrecognitionmemory
AT christopheluxembourger battlebetweenthecorrectandmirrorwritingsofadigitinchildrensrecognitionmemory