Beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated SUVmax in FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective study from a single center

BackgroundControversy surrounds the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in the treatment of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomograp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miao Huang, Bing Liu, Xiang Li, Nan Li, Xin Yang, Yaqi Wang, Shanyuan Zhang, Fangliang Lu, Shaolei Li, Shi Yan, Nan Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200/full
Description
Summary:BackgroundControversy surrounds the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in the treatment of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) on the efficacy of ACT in patients diagnosed with stage I LUAD.MethodsWe scrutinized the medical records of 928 consecutive patients who underwent complete surgical resection for pathological stage I LUAD at our institution. The ideal cut-off value for primary tumor SUVmax in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined using the X-tile software. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used for survival analysis.ResultsBased on the SUVmax algorithm, the ideal cutoff values were determined to be 4.9 for DFS and 5.0 for OS. We selected 5.0 as the threshold because OS is the more widely accepted predictive endpoint. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, SUVmax ≥ 5.0, problematic IB stage, and sublobectomy were identified as independent risk factors for poor DFS and OS. It is noteworthy that patients who were administered ACT had significantly longer DFS and OS than what was observed in the subgroup of patients with pathological stage IB LUAD and SUVmax ≥ 5.0 (p < 0.035 and p ≤ 0.046, respectively). However, there was no observed survival advantage for patients in stages IA or IB who had an SUVmax < 5.0.ConclusionThe preoperative SUVmax of tumors served as an indicator of the impact of ACT in the context of completely resected pathological stage I LUAD. Notably, patients within the Stage IB category exhibiting elevated SUVmax levels emerged as a subgroup experiencing substantial benefits from postoperative ACT.
ISSN:2234-943X