Evaluation of Sofi Tissue Differences between Different Skeletal Anomalies in Sagittal Direction

The aim of this study is to evaluate the cephalometric soft tissue differences of early adults in sagittal direction. Our study consists of 63 patients' lateral cephalograms who referred to University of Dicle Faculty of Dentistry for orthodontic treatment (Class I: 23, Class II: 19, Class III...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seher Gündüz-Arslan, Kamile Keskin, Atılım Akkurt, Jalen Devecioğlu-Kama
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2008-04-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Subjects:
Online Access: http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/evaluation-of-sofi-tissue-differences-between-diff/53780
_version_ 1797767359531843584
author Seher Gündüz-Arslan
Kamile Keskin
Atılım Akkurt
Jalen Devecioğlu-Kama
author_facet Seher Gündüz-Arslan
Kamile Keskin
Atılım Akkurt
Jalen Devecioğlu-Kama
author_sort Seher Gündüz-Arslan
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study is to evaluate the cephalometric soft tissue differences of early adults in sagittal direction. Our study consists of 63 patients' lateral cephalograms who referred to University of Dicle Faculty of Dentistry for orthodontic treatment (Class I: 23, Class II: 19, Class III: 21). The main age was 19.28 years. 24 angular and linear measurements were performed in cephalometric radiographs of patients. According to Mann Whitney U test only the PMA angle showed statistically significant differences in comparison of Class I and II patients. In comparison of adult Class I and III patients; Class III patients were showed greater values in; A-UpSulcus, Uplip-E Line, MLA and PMA parameters. In comparison of adult Class II and III patients with normal vertical pattern, PTV-Nasaltip and PTV-UpSulcus parameters were greater for Class II patients. Regardless of abnormality in skeletal tissue of underlying soft tissue it still has a great tendency to return to normal. We observed that compensatory mechanism works remarkably especially for soft tissues of Class II anomaly groups.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T20:37:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d3dfa67fb2314c01a49c22be5fc3c7c3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2528-9659
2148-9505
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T20:37:35Z
publishDate 2008-04-01
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
record_format Article
series Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
spelling doaj.art-d3dfa67fb2314c01a49c22be5fc3c7c32023-08-01T12:12:14ZengGalenos YayineviTurkish Journal of Orthodontics2528-96592148-95052008-04-01211334410.13076/1300-3550-21-1-3313049054Evaluation of Sofi Tissue Differences between Different Skeletal Anomalies in Sagittal DirectionSeher Gündüz-Arslan0Kamile Keskin1Atılım Akkurt2Jalen Devecioğlu-Kama3 Dicle Univ. Faculty of Dentistry, Dept. of Orthodontics, Diyarbakır, Turkey Dicle Univ. Faculty of Dentistry, Dept. of Orthodontics, Diyarbakır, Turkey Dicle Univ. Faculty of Dentistry, Dept. of Orthodontics, Diyarbakır, Turkey Dicle Univ. Faculty of Dentistry, Dept. of Orthodontics, Diyarbakır, Turkey The aim of this study is to evaluate the cephalometric soft tissue differences of early adults in sagittal direction. Our study consists of 63 patients' lateral cephalograms who referred to University of Dicle Faculty of Dentistry for orthodontic treatment (Class I: 23, Class II: 19, Class III: 21). The main age was 19.28 years. 24 angular and linear measurements were performed in cephalometric radiographs of patients. According to Mann Whitney U test only the PMA angle showed statistically significant differences in comparison of Class I and II patients. In comparison of adult Class I and III patients; Class III patients were showed greater values in; A-UpSulcus, Uplip-E Line, MLA and PMA parameters. In comparison of adult Class II and III patients with normal vertical pattern, PTV-Nasaltip and PTV-UpSulcus parameters were greater for Class II patients. Regardless of abnormality in skeletal tissue of underlying soft tissue it still has a great tendency to return to normal. We observed that compensatory mechanism works remarkably especially for soft tissues of Class II anomaly groups. http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/evaluation-of-sofi-tissue-differences-between-diff/53780 soft tissuecompensationclass iclass iiclass iii
spellingShingle Seher Gündüz-Arslan
Kamile Keskin
Atılım Akkurt
Jalen Devecioğlu-Kama
Evaluation of Sofi Tissue Differences between Different Skeletal Anomalies in Sagittal Direction
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
soft tissue
compensation
class i
class ii
class iii
title Evaluation of Sofi Tissue Differences between Different Skeletal Anomalies in Sagittal Direction
title_full Evaluation of Sofi Tissue Differences between Different Skeletal Anomalies in Sagittal Direction
title_fullStr Evaluation of Sofi Tissue Differences between Different Skeletal Anomalies in Sagittal Direction
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Sofi Tissue Differences between Different Skeletal Anomalies in Sagittal Direction
title_short Evaluation of Sofi Tissue Differences between Different Skeletal Anomalies in Sagittal Direction
title_sort evaluation of sofi tissue differences between different skeletal anomalies in sagittal direction
topic soft tissue
compensation
class i
class ii
class iii
url http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/evaluation-of-sofi-tissue-differences-between-diff/53780
work_keys_str_mv AT sehergunduzarslan evaluationofsofitissuedifferencesbetweendifferentskeletalanomaliesinsagittaldirection
AT kamilekeskin evaluationofsofitissuedifferencesbetweendifferentskeletalanomaliesinsagittaldirection
AT atılımakkurt evaluationofsofitissuedifferencesbetweendifferentskeletalanomaliesinsagittaldirection
AT jalendevecioglukama evaluationofsofitissuedifferencesbetweendifferentskeletalanomaliesinsagittaldirection